The Lab Assignment

In this Lab Assignment, you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients, as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions. 

To Prepare

  • Review the Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study.
  • Based on the Episodic note case study:
    • Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study. Refer to Chapter 3 of the Sullivan resource to guide you as you complete your Lab Assignment.
    • Search the Walden library or the Internet for evidence-based resources to support your answers to the questions provided.
    • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.
    • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
    • Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

The Lab Assignment

Using evidence-based resources from your search, answer the following questions and support your answers using current evidence from the literature.

  • Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  • Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
  • Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
  • Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

GENITALIA ASSESSMENT

Subjective:

  • CC: “I have bumps on my bottom that I want to have checked out.”
  • HPI: AB, a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough. She states she is sexually active and has had more than one partner during the past year. Her initial sexual contact occurred at age 18. She reports no abnormal vaginal discharge. She is unsure how long the bumps have been there but noticed them about a week ago. Her last Pap smear exam was 3 years ago, and no dysplasia was found; the exam results were normal. She reports one sexually transmitted infection (chlamydia) about 2 years ago. She completed the treatment for chlamydia as prescribed.
  • PMH: Asthma
  • Medications: Symbicort 160/4.5mcg
  • Allergies: NKDA
  • FH: No hx of breast or cervical cancer, Father hx HTN, Mother hx HTN, GERD
  • Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys)

Objective:

  • VS: Temp 98.6; BP 120/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 169lbs
  • Heart: RRR, no murmurs
  • Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical
  • Genital: Normal female hair pattern distribution; no masses or swelling. Urethral meatus intact without erythema or discharge. Perineum intact. Vaginal mucosa pink and moist with rugae present, pos for firm, round, small, painless ulcer noted on external labia.
  • Abd: soft, normoactive bowel sounds, neg rebound, neg murphy’s, negMcBurney
  • Diagnostics: HSV specimen obtained

Assessment:

  • Chancre

READ IT IS ONLY 1 QUESTION TO ANSWER !!!

 

Understanding Tom Penders

It was Monday afternoon and Brenda Smith was very excited. She just got off the phone with Tom Penders, the administrator in charge of a large medical office in her territory. After an introductory letter and several follow-up phone calls, Tom Penders finally agreed to meet with Brenda next Friday to discuss the possibility of replacing his organization’s old copiers, as well as adding new copiers to keep pace with his organization’s rapid growth. The primary purpose of the meeting was for Tom to learn more about the National Copier Company and its products and for Brenda to learn more about Tom’s company and its specific needs.

When Brenda arrived about 10 minutes early for her meeting with Tom Penders at the medical offices on Friday, she was greeted by a receptionist who asked her to be seated. Ten minutes passed and Brenda was promptly shown to Tom’s office. Brenda couldn’t help but notice how organized Tom’s office was. It appeared to Brenda that Tom was a man of detail. First, Tom explained that the medical offices housed over 25 doctors specializing in a variety of fields. They occupied two floors and were planning to expand to the vacant third floor in the near future. Currently, they were organized into four divisions with an office professional assigned to approximately six doctors for each division. Each division ran its own “office” with a separate copier and administrative facilities. Tom also had an assistant and a copier. Upon concluding his overview, Tom provided Brenda with an opportunity to ask questions. After this, Tom systematically went down a list of questions he had about NCC, its products, and Brenda herself. Following this, Tom had his assistant take Brenda on a tour of the facility so she could overview their processes. Before leaving, Tom agreed to meet with Brenda in two weeks.

Based on her conversation with Tom, Brenda did not find Tom to be a particularly personable individual. In fact, she found him to be somewhat cool and aloof, both deliberate in his communication and actions. Yet, Tom was willing to learn how NCC could help his medical office. While Brenda preferred communicating with someone more personable and open, such as herself, she was determined to find a way to win Tom’s business.

The question to answer is:

 1. Based on your understanding of Tom’s communication style, outline a plan for selling to Tom Penders. 

Assignment week 8 Capstone

 

Assignment: Capstone Project Part IV: The Technicals: Measuring and Evaluating Performance

Most human and social services professionals come into their professions to make a difference. Doing so at the societal level is both a challenge and an opportunity. Being a successful social change agent, leader, and advocate requires both skill and commitment. To accomplish large-scale change to address societal issues as part of the technical aspects of a strategic plan, human and social services professionals need to address indicators of success and performance targets.

To prepare:

  • This Assignment is the second part of developing the technicals for your Capstone Project.
  • Think about how you might apply the theories and processes of change, leadership, and advocacy when implementing a strategic plan that addresses indicators of success and performance targets.
By Day 7

The Assignment (2–3 pages):

  • Describe leading indicators of success. To determine whether the agency, organization, or community will benefit from the strategic plan, you must identify those things which would serve as indicators of success. These indicators must be observable, measurable, and quantifiable in some way.
    • Identify four indicators that would signify success with regard to the strategic plan.
    • Discuss specifically how you would measure each indicator.
  • Identify performance targets. Performance targets represent the level at which you would like to observe performance on each indicator. They represent the desired level of performance. For each performance indicator that you have identified, specify the targeted level of performance.

Support your Application Assignment by citing all resources in APA style, including those in the Learning Resources.

I need help with an Integrated Business Management and Assessment paper

 

Your process improvement plan will be due in Module 8 of this course.  For this module’s activity, you will focus on developing the new process or revising the current process for your organization. Use your SWOT analysis alongside the management theory you choose in the Module 2 discussion to help you develop the new process or complete the revision and ensure that it focuses upon providing a better service for the customer. Consider the following:

  • How can you turn the current process’s weaknesses into strengths?
  • Is it possible to carry over the strengths of the old process to the new process?
  • Does the policy need to be revised or completely redesigned?  

Provide specific evidence that the new process will produce better results than the old process and a better service to the customer. This could be data related to the old process that points out its inefficiencies, or a discussion of how the new process addresses these inefficiencies.

You should show a direct correlation between the new or revised process and organizational goals. Will this process help us achieve our mission or vision? If not, how we can justify the implementation of the new process? You should also address whether there are any legal, ethical, or social issues that will arise due to the process being changed. You should ensure that the process improvement that you propose ultimately benefits the customer, either directly or indirectly: whether that is improving customer service, simplifying the delivery process, increasing employee satisfaction through improved motivation or career development, or developing a shared organizational vision. These are just a few examples.

This assignment should include the following:

  • A substantive 3 to 4 page process proposal.
  • Specific evidence that shows that the new process will be better than the old process in delivering a better service to the customer.
  • Proof that the new process is in line with the organization’s goals.
  • The management theories you will be using in order to ensure the new process is efficient.
  • A 1 to 2 page reflection on how marketing theories can help you improve your process proposal and how using those theories will help you sell the proposal to the board.

Week 5 Writing Notebook

 

Each week you have had an opportunity to practice different aspects of the writing process in a writing notebook. It consists of a template you will fill out and submit in Canvas. In addition to introducing and practicing targeted components of the writing process, these notebooks are meant to help you to determine your own strengths and identify opportunities for growth.

This week, the writing notebook focuses on how to build and maintain your ePortfolio so that it represents your growing skills and abilities.

In Week 1 of this course, it was recommended that you begin building your Folio profile. If you did not have a chance to take that step yet, refer back to the Building an ePortfolio page and follow the steps to create your Folio profile and view the resources provided.

In the Week 5 Writing Notebook you will

  • Identify the writing that you have done for this course that you wish to include in your ePortfolio introduction.
  • Develop a project description for your Future Opportunities Essay, which you will be uploading as a project to your Folio.
  • Determine the skills that you will tag your Future Opportunities Essay with.

Follow the steps outlined below to complete this week’s writing notebook:

  • Download the Week 5 Writing Notebook Template below, which has been provided for you in both a Word document and a PDF file.
  • Week 5 Writing Notebook Template download(PDF)
  • Week 5 Writing Notebook Template download(Word)
    • Please note that you can choose to print out the template and mark it up as long as you can scan it back into your computer for submission in Canvas by Day 7.
  • Complete all steps of the Week 5 Writing Notebook, including the reflection step.
  • Save the file to your computer (desktop or a folder).
  • Click on the “Submit Assignment” button to submit. When you have finished uploading your document, click on the subsequent “Submit Assignment” so your instructor may receive your document for grading.

Case Study Pacific Oil Company

 DUE 25 APRIL 2021 at 11:59 CST

Pacific Oil Company

Read the Pacific Oil Company case study. Prepare an analysis of the case study that addresses the following objectives:

1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Fontaine’s and Gaudin’s negotiating strategy in their deliberations with Reliant Chemical Company.

2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Hauptman’s and Zinnser’s negotiating strategy.

3. What action should Fontaine take at the end of the case? Why?

Conclusions must be well reasoned and supported with at least 5 citations from the course readings. The analysis should be a minimum of 750 words in APA format, excluding the title page and references. Be sure to follow the guidelines outlined in the grading rubric below.

Requirements:

· Prepare a quality, substantive paper that addresses the objectives of the assignment and the expectations set forth in the grading rubric.

· A minimum of 750 words.

· Use APA format – Refer to APA Style and the Online Writing Center resources in Academic Resources for guidance on paper and citation formatting.

o Conclusions must be well reasoned and supported with at least 5 citations from the course readings

o All external cited sources must have been published within the 5 years.

Ethical (Due 24 hours)

 

1) Minimum 7 full pages (Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum three paragraphs per part)

             Part 1: Minimum 1 page

             Part 2: minimum 1 page

             Part 3: Minimum 5 pages

Submit 1 document per part

2)¨******APA norms

          All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraphs

          Bulleted responses are not accepted

          Dont write in the first person 

          Dont copy and pase the questions.

          Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

Submit 1 document per part

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks) 

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 3 references per part not older than 5 years

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next

Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 

Example:

Part 1.doc 

Part 2.do

__________________________________________________________________________________

Part 1: Ethical

 

1. What would spirituality be according to your own worldview? 

2. How do you believe that your conception of spirituality would influence the way in which you care for patients?

Part 2: Ethical

 

 1. What aspects of the topic readings do you find the most interesting? ( how science and medicine are so closely related ) and why

2. What is your view of the analysis of disease and healing in the readings? Explain.

Part 3: Ethical

 

Write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

In one page:

1. Explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality 

2. ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.

In one page:

3. Explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.

In 3 pages:

Answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:

4. What is ultimate reality?

5. What is the nature of the universe?

6. What is a human being?

7. What is knowledge?

8. What is your basis of ethics?

9. What is the purpose of your existence?

Choose an area/ team in your current work environment

  

In order to be successful in this assessment you are required to complete the following steps: Choose an area/ team in your current work environment Spend 1 week observing the style and process of communication taking place Document your observations / field notes in Mahara Request a minimum of 5 colleagues to discuss and record their answers to the following questions: What is the reason you believe denial is so prevalent in the healthcare setting with respect to stress for physicians, nurses, and allied health personnel? When you think of the terms “burnout,” “compassion fatigue,” and “chronic secondary stress,” what do you think of in terms of your own life? What are the issues that make you most anxious? What are the ones you deal with the best? What elements that are currently in your self-care protocol have been most beneficial for you? What are the least? What do you struggle with most in your efforts to take care of yourself? What are the “bad habits” of the people you observe in your profession that you do not want to emulate? 5. Analyze you colleague answers to the questions and identify common ‘themes’ across the responses – watch the following video to learn a quick and easy method for thematic analysis https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=KUZ6iGvJlGI&feature=emb_title 6. Review your thematic analysis against the field notes that you took during your week of observation 7. Develop your argument for the level of resilience amongst HCP in the area you assessed Field Notes: – Things to pay attention to: – When & where key communications take place – Tone of voice used – Body language – Volume and quality of work – Interactions with supervisor – Unwillingness to change practice or behavior – Supervision outside the hierarchy

edu 599 week 8 journal

 This assignment consists of three parts:

  • Part 1: Professional Resources and Issues in Education.
  • Part 2: Action Plan for Continued Growth.
  • Part 3: Career Readiness Documents.

You must submit all three parts for the completion of this assignment.

Part 1: Professional Resources and Issues in Education

For Part 1, use the Internet or the Strayer University Library to research professional organizations, grant opportunities, and/or virtual learning communities pertinent to both the theme of your portfolio and your current or prospective work environment.

Write a 2–3 page paper in which you:

  • Examine relevant organizations and key issues in education that will be beneficial to you as you continue to work in your future career.
  • Select at least two of the professional organizations, grant opportunities, and/or virtual learning communities that you have researched, and analyze the manner in which you would utilize the organizations you selected to support your continued professional development.
  • Predict at least three issues that you believe will be of particular significance within the next decade, or choose three remaining questions that you ponder which relate to both the theme of your portfolio and your current or prospective work environment.
  • Select one of the issues or questions you identified in relation to your theme and work environment, and construct an annotated bibliography of at least five print and non-print resources to consult in the future. 
Part 2: Action Plan for Continued Growth

Write a 2–3 page paper in which you:

  • Examine your development during the program and develop an action plan for continued growth.
  • Specify the development of your information literacy and research skills throughout your coursework. Provide one to three papers, artifacts, or examples from previous coursework in order to demonstrate your changes and acquired knowledge within this area. Note: If you do not have papers, artifacts, or examples, attach the descriptions of your chosen previous assignments.
  • Develop a plan for continued information literacy development as part of your personal and professional growth plan. Your plan must include, at a minimum, the following:
    • 3–5 information literacy goals.
    • Potential means (e.g., organizations and resources that you may utilize) to achieve the information literacy goals.
    • Relevant strategies for applying the literacy skills in educational/work environment.
  • Specify the development of your writing skills throughout your coursework. Provide one to three papers, artifacts, or examples from previous coursework to demonstrate your changes and learning in this area. Identify plans for continued writing development as part of your personal and professional growth plan. Note: If you do not have papers, artifacts, or examples, attach the descriptions of your chosen previous assignments.
  • Create an action plan geared toward both building upon your personal and professional strengths (identified in Reflective Journal: Strengths-Based Reflection) and toward improving your weaknesses related to your portfolio theme. Your plan must include, at a minimum, the following:
    • 3–5 goals.
    • 3–5 key steps that you plan to take for further evaluation and continuous improvement.
    • Potential means (e.g., organizations and resources that you may utilize) to achieve these goals.
    • Relevant strategies for applying the plan in educational/work environment
Part 3: Career Readiness Documents

Submit the final versions of your career readiness documents that you have been working on during the course. Submit each of the following documents in the appendix of your final assignment submission:

  • A one-page cover letter that introduces yourself to employers and showcases your skills, qualifications and experience relevant to a position that you would like to apply for in the future.
  • A resume or CV that includes the following, at minimum:
    • Contact details.
    • Opening statement.
    • List of key skills.
    • Personal attributes/career overview.
    • Educational qualifications.
    • Employment history.
  •  A 1–2 page teaching philosophy that documents your beliefs about education.

PSYC 2301

This is the list of book from which you must choose. The textbook CANNOT be used as a book report. Your paper must be in either MLA or APA format, and 1500 words in length (not including headers and work cited) – double spaced.  Your paper must be submitted using the submission link for the book report.  It  must be in “word format”. NO GOOGLE docs. You may not use a previously  handed in paper from another time you took this class. That will result  in a zero for the paper.  

Please reference any work cited. The book report is to be 1500 words in length, double spaced, using MLA or APA format.  If you need help with your report, please contact the NLC writing center.  To submit your paper – please attach your paper in a “word” format.  Do not cut and paste.  Do not plagiarize!   That will be a zero.  Also, no papers previously submitted will be accepted. That will also result in a zero.

The book report needs to include a brief overview of the content of the book, plus your reflection on the material.  Also,why is this book important to the field of psychology?  Where does this book fit in the area of psychological study?