Module 13: External Growth Strategies and Implementation

 

Module 13: Discussion Forum

In this module, we explored the role of the corporate headquarters and its relationship with individual businesses, and how the corporate headquarters creates value by making mergers/acquisitions and alliances.

Select a Saudi Arabian company. Describe this company’s experiences with mergers/acquisitions and alliances?  

  1. Why did the Saudi Arabian company merge/acquire and/or make alliances with other companies? That is, what competencies and opportunities did the Saudi Arabian company seek from its association with the target company?
  2. Did the merger/acquisition and/or alliance create or destroy value? (Provide evidence to back the assessment of value creation/destruction.)
  3. What recommendations would you make to the Saudi Arabian company concerning this or future mergers/acquisitions and/or alliances?

Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines.

You are required to reply to at least two peer discussion question post answers to this weekly discussion question and/or your instructor’s response to your posting. These post replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to the content of the post and evaluate/analyze that post answer. Normal course dialogue doesn’t fulfill these two peer replies but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required.

ERM W 11 D

 

The readings this week expand on investigation and of digital forensic analysis and investigations. Organizations, especially those in the public, health and educational areas are bound by legal and statutory requirements to protect data and private information, therefore digital forensics analysis will be very beneficial when security breaches do occur. Using this weeks readings and your own research, discuss digital forensics and how it could be used in a risk management program.

Please make your initial post and two response posts substantive. A substantive post will do at least TWO of the following:

  • Ask an interesting, thoughtful question pertaining to the topic
  • Answer a question (in detail) posted by another student or the instructor
  • Provide extensive additional information on the topic
  • Explain, define, or analyze the topic in detail
  • Share an applicable personal experience
  • Provide an outside source (for example, an article from the UC Library) that applies to the topic, along with additional information about the topic or the source (please cite properly in APA 7)
  • Make an argument concerning the topic.

At least one scholarly source should be used in the initial discussion thread. Be sure to use information from your readings and other sources from the UC Library. Use proper citations and references in your post.

The Squire Hotel Group

 

Read the case found at the end of Chapter 10 in your textbook and  write a two- to three-page paper (excluding title and reference pages),  according to APA style guidelines, on the following items:

The case is as followed:

The Squire Hotel Group (SHG) runs a chain of 20 hotels, with between 40 and 120 bedrooms, in locations that include Oxford, Warwick and Southport. SHG sees itself in the three-star market, with hotels that have their own personality and style, providing high-quality food and service at an affordable price. The majority of mid-week guests are commercial clients. The normal mid-week occupancy rate is about 80 per cent. Weekend occupancy is about 30 per cent, comprising mainly weekend break packages. The company does not have any major expansion plans but is trying to strengthen its existing market position.Squire’s managing director, Justin Palmer, believes that it has a high degree of customer loyalty in the commercial sector. He explains:

  • The hotel managers are expected to integrate with their local community through Chambers of Commerce and Round Tables, primarily to gain visibility but also to demonstrate a local and caring attitude. The image they try to create is a good-quality, small and friendly hotel that local business can rely upon for their visitors. The hotel managers are expected to work hard to develop personal relationships with local firms and may also try to promote other hotels in the chain for any ‘away’ visits. We get most of our repeat bookings because of the reputation we have developed for the quality of our food and attentive and courteous service.

The Squire Hotel Oxford has 41 bedrooms and is situated close to Magdalen College. The entrance lobby is small but pleasantly decorated. The room is dominated by a grandfather clock and an elegant mahogany desk. ‘I do not like the traditional counter arrangement,’ explained Charles Harper, the hotel’s manager. ‘I like a simple, open and friendly situation with a clear desk to demonstrate our uncluttered and caring attitude. Even our computers are kept in a small room just off the lobby, out of sight. I want my guests to feel that they are important and not just one of the 70 that we are going to deal with that evening.’SHG’s hotel managers are totally responsible for their own operations. They set staff levels and wages within clear guidelines set by head office. Although pricing policy is determined centrally, there is scope for adjustment and they can negotiate with local firms or groups in consultation with head office. Charles Harper added: ‘Every year, each hotel manager agrees the financial targets for his own operation with head office, and if the manager does not reach his target without good reason, he may well find himself out of a job. I believe that it is my job to be constantly improving and developing this business. This is naturally reflected in the yearly profit expectations.’ The hotel managers report performance to the group monthly on four criteria: occupancy, profit, staff costs and food costs. The information provided allows senior managers to drill down to the costs of individual people and meals.Charles Harper explained:

  • My job is to try to get and maintain 100 per cent occupancy rates and keep costs within budget. During the tourist season Oxford has more tourists looking for beds than it has beds, so in the peak season, which is only two months long, we expect to achieve 100 per cent utilisation of rooms. Indeed, I am budgeted for it. This has been a bad year so far. The high value of the pound has kept many American tourists away and our occupancy has sometimes been as low as 90 per cent. In the off-season our occupancy drops to 60 per cent – this is still very good and is due to our excellent location. In the peak season we charge a premium on our rooms. This does not cause any problems, but our guests do expect a high standard of food and service.We get very few complaints. Usually these are about the food, things like the temperature of the vegetables, though recently we had a complaint from two elderly ladies about the jukebox in the bar. We don’t have any formal means of collecting information about quality. Head office may come and check the hotel once or twice a year. We always know when they are coming and try to look after them. We don’t use complaints or suggestion forms in the bedrooms because I think it tends to get people to complain or question the service. However, I do try to collect some information myself in order to get an indication from guests about how they feel about the quality or the price. I don’t document the results, but we know what is going on. Our aim is to prevent complaints by asking and acting during the service.
  • I have 40 staff, most of whom are full time. Ten work mainly on the liquor side, 20 on food and 10 on apartments. There is a restaurant manager and a bar manager. Staff turnover is 70 per cent, which compares very well with most hotels, where turnover can be as high as 300 per cent. In general, the staff are very good and seem to enjoy working here.

The restaurant at the Squire Hotel in Oxford has 20 tables with a total seating capacity of 100. The restaurant is well used at lunchtime by tourists and visitors to the local colleges and by local business people. However, there are several excellent and famous restaurants that tend to draw potential customers and even hotel guests away from the hotel restaurant in the evenings.The restaurant managers have considerable discretion in menu planning, purchasing and staffing, providing they keep to the budgets set by head office. These budgets specify, for example, the food and staff costs for an individual breakfast, lunch and dinner. Overall food costs and staff costs are reported weekly to the hotel manager. The style of restaurants in the hotels varies considerably from carvery to à la carte, with the decisions made on the basis of the type of hotel and the requirements of the local community. Elizabeth Dickens, the restaurant manager, explained:

  • My job is concerned with keeping to food and staff budgets and so most of my time is taken up with staffing, purchasing and menu planning. At lunchtime, for example, I provide four items, three traditional and one vegetarian, and these change weekly. We aim to serve a main course within 15 minutes of taking an order. I am constantly looking for new ideas for our menus and better ways of serving but I am constrained by continually tightening budgets from head office. I think we have now reached the point where we are starting to lose many of our established customers. We really do need to respond to the changing demands of our customers in terms of speed of service, particularly at lunchtimes, and changes in diet together with the desire for a greater and more interesting range of meals. I think head office is out of touch with reality.

Questions1Evaluate the performance measures in place at the Squire Hotel Group.

2What improvements would you suggest?

(Clark 381-383)

Clark, Robert Johnston and G. Service Operations Management, 3/e for Ashford University,  3rd Edition. Pearson Learning Solutions. VitalBook file.

The citation provided is a guideline. Please check each citation for accuracy before use.

  • Evaluate the performance measures in place at the Squire Hotel Group (SHG).
  • Provide suggestions for improving SHG’s existing market position.

Use at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook, to support your points.

DB2 – Chapter 1

 {250 words minimum}

 You are expected to use the textbook as your first source and to cite in-text where you used the the text information. A complete reference list is expected at the end of each discussion. You are expected to respond thoughtfully to at least one classmate (see the rubric and samples in the syllabus). Do not wait until the deadline to submit. You may get closed out and you will not have time to read what others have written and respond thoughtfully. Review the section under the Syllabus tab for sources you cannot use.   

In this chapter we explore some of the most important issues in psychology. We learn what we know about psychology from our research and it is critical that students of psychology understand the components of a research study as well as the ethical issues involved in conducting research.

 Review the chapter on research methods as well. 

Review the samples of informed consent documents.

For the discussion, tell us what you think are the three most critical issues for a researcher to consider. Also include what you see as particular problems in researching psychological disorders. As always, be sure you are referencing specifics from the text and other readings. You must identify only three.

Writing Notebook

 

Week 4 Writing Notebook

[WLOs: 3, 4] [CLOs: 2, 4, 5]

Each week you will have an opportunity to practice different aspects of the writing process in this writing notebook. It consists of a template you will fill out and submit in Canvas. In addition to introducing and practicing targeted components of the writing process, these notebooks are meant to help you to determine your own strengths and identify opportunities for growth.

This week, the writing notebook focuses on how to analyze context and situation for your writing to ensure that you choose the best rhetorical style for your purpose.

Before you begin this week’s writing notebook, please read the following Writing Center resources:

In the Week 4 Writing Notebook you will,

  • Analyze the context and situation for your writing to ensure that you choose the best rhetorical style for your purpose.
  • Follow the steps outlined below to complete this week’s writing notebook:
  • Download the Week 4 Writing Notebook Template below, which has been provided for you in both a Word document and a PDF file.
  • Week 4 Writing Notebook Template download(PDF)
  • Week 4 Writing Notebook Template download(Word)
  • Complete all steps of the Situation, Context, and Rhetorical Style Activity in the Week 4 Writing Notebook, including the reflection step.

INT 1010

 Instructions for Assignment 1Attached Files:

Create an Evaluation Matrix Chart in Excel that will let you compare the 3 careers/positions at technology companies side by side on each criterion. 

What should be in the matrix are:

  1. Three technology careers/positions (i.e. system analysis, software engineer, help desk technician) to evaluate.
  2. Five criteria (all students must use these criteria).  
    1. Salary
    2. Education/Certification
    3. Career Outlook (what percentage of jobs will be available in the future)
    4. Duties
    5. Work Schedule

Look up the criteria for each of your careers/professions on the Bureau of Labor and Statistics Occupational Outlook Handbook at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/ and O*Net  https://www.onetonline.org/.  You may use other sources of information. 

Create 2 Excel worksheets.   

  1. The first is your Excel matrix chart with formulas to calculate weighted scores using a mixed cell reference. This will enable you to see which career scored best with the raw scores and then which career scored best with the weighted scores.
  2. The second is a chart of your results from the matrix.  The chart may be the style of your choice. It must give good information about the data in your worksheet with your matrix. Name each worksheet in the workbook appropriately. Submit your file with both worksheets into the Blackboard assignment for this phase.

Divide 100 points among the criteria, with the highest number of points going to the criteria that is most important to you.

An example of the matrix is in this section as an attachment.  Watch videos in the video reference folder for guidance.  Additional Resources available under GCFLearnFree.org section.

Do not forget to record your sources/references.

Thinking About Experience and Goals

Discussion 1

WRTG 112 is a required course for all students, so that is probably one reason you are taking it. However, we all have individual backgrounds and goals that affect how we approach a learning experience. Read over the course syllabus, and then post your responses to the following questions in two paragraphs:

  1. What prior experiences do you have that inform how you approach this class? This could be, for example, writing experience that you think will either help or hurt you as you work on the academic writing assigned in class.
  2. What are some of your aspirations (educational, professional, or other goals) that you can work toward by taking Introduction to Writing, and how might this course help you on your path toward your goals? Which, if any, of the reasons for taking college courses discussed by Michelle Singletary in “Getting to the Real Point of College” apply to you?

Discussion 2

 

Personal Grammar Challenges

Each week in WRTG 112, we will have a brief lesson on a grammar or punctuation topic, and you will be encouraged to apply the lesson to your own writing. At the same time, you can be working toward your own goals for improved mastery of grammar and punctuation.

Initial post (by Friday):

Identify at least one area of grammar or punctuation in which you think you have room for improvement. How could you work towards the goal of improving in this area? Answer in one paragraph.

FIN-320 Principles of Finance – Case Study: Assessing a Company’s Future Financial Health

Overview

People should understand the impact of different types of risk on financial health, whether they’re dealing with personal or corporate finances. The risks involved with personal finance often only impact individuals and families—for example, when determining if you can afford to buy a house or deciding whether to invest in stocks. Financial risks for businesses often affect multiple people throughout the entire company, including individuals who do not work in the finance department. When businesses make finance-related decisions, it is essential that they know how their decisions will impact different aspects of their company.

Prompt

Read the Assessing a Company’s Future Financial Health case study, then write a response.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  • Systematic and Unsystematic Risk: Explain the differences between systematic and unsystematic risk.
  • Financial Risks: Describe the potential impacts of the following types of financial risk on the company featured in the case study:
    • Interest rate risk
    • Economic risk
    • Credit risk
    • Operational risk
  • Lower Growth Impact: Explain the impact a lower growth in sales could have on the dividend policy and retained earnings for the company featured in the case study.
  • Higher Growth Impact: Explain the impact a higher growth in sales could have on the dividend policy and retained earnings for the company featured in the case study.

Guidelines for Submission

Your submission should be a 2 to 3-page Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.

discussion about peer reviews

Please see the requirements in the picture and also respond to two of my classmates: 

1. Hi everyone!

It was interesting to read other students essays and compare it with my own. One of the essays I was given was amazing and I unfortunately could not give any feedback for improvements, could also be because english is not my first language and that essay was beyond my english knowledge. After reviewing all the essays i I realized that they had some trouble with the MLA style, I would strongly recommend to view the sample essay from week 3 to understand how to make the paper look like a MLA paper. Content sources was also a problem, it needs to be credible sources and I recommend to use scholarly articles which can be found through the library database easily. A clearly stated working thesis was missing in some of the essays I was handed for peer reviews. The strengths about all the essays was that it was interesting topics and I it was explained how and why that particular topic was chosen. What I would suggest for everyone to do while doing any type of school project, always look at the instructions carefully and follow the rubrics if it is available.

After reading the essays I will take inspiration from the one essay that I thought was amazing and try to improve mine. I will have to improve my structure, my choice of words and to improve my working thesis. I feel confident with my MLA style after comparing with the other essays. I am excited to see what feedback I will get in order to learn more and change my essay to improve it. When I first stated this class I was nervous about my english but I can see already now in only 4 weeks that I have learned a lot and becoming much better in my writing. This makes me more confident about my english and since it is not my first language I am happy whenever I feel that I get better.

2. The predominant weaknesses I caught while reading the four peer essays assigned to me were minor but prevalent MLA issues, organizational issues for the essay as a whole, and on the sentence level, typos and awkward or incorrect phrasing. Some people felt the need to use excessively formal language, but then reverted to less formal, making for inconsistent voice and style. I probably do the same on occasion–it’s difficult to let go of the notion that “big words” equal good writing. On the other hand, as far as strengths, each person seemed to be passionate about the topic they’d chosen and seemed committed to it. Most were not far off from a polished final draft. Noticing organizational issues in other people’s work has made me more adept at recognizing it in my own.

As for my own essay, I’m hoping to receive my peer reviews before I set to work on my final draft. So far I haven’t received any. I’ve always relied on feedback from editors or fellow writers to improve my writing, and while I don’t accept everything that’s thrown at me, quite often I apply more than half, especially if numerous people are telling me similar things.

A question of ethics: The Common Law Tradition

On July 5, 1884, Dudley, Stephens, and Brooks – “all able-bodied English seamen” – and a teenage English boy were cast adrift in a lifeboat following a storm at sea. They had no water with them in the boat, and all they had for sustenance were two one-pound tins of turnips. On July 24, Dudley proposed that one of the four in the lifeboat be sacrificed to save the others. Stephens agreed with Dudley, but Brooks refused to consent – and the boy was never asked for his opinion. On July 25, Dudley killed the boy, and the three men then fed on the boy’s body and blood. Four days later, a passing vessel rescued the men.

They were taken to England and tried for the murder of the boy. If the men had not fed on the boy’s body, they would probably have died of starvation within the four-day period. The boy, who was in a much weaker condition, would likely have died before the rest. [Regina v Dudley and Stephens 14 Q.D.B. (Queens Bench Division, England) 273 (1884)]

(a) The basic question in this case is whether the survivors should be subject to penalties under English criminal law, given the men’s unusual circumstances. Were the defendants’ actions necessary but unethical? Explain your reasoning. What ethical issues might be involved here?

(b) Should judges ever have the power to look beyond the written “letter of the law” in making their decisions? Why or why not?