A‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍s stated in your textbook, part of the purpose of Writing About Writing “is to give you the language and the ideas to figure out what conceptions of writing you are experiencing and which ones might be most accurate, and what to do about that” (p. 4). In that spirit, this introductory unit invites you to think deeply and differently about what you have already learned and know about writing, what some of the key concepts of WRTG 111 are, and what new questions about writing and reading you may have.

We will be exploring two writing concepts that will remain central to the course: ? that writers learn by studying writing, and ? that writers benefit from reflecting on their writing. Entering the Conversation To help you enter conversations about writing and to develop as a writer for many years to come, this assignment asks you to define and analyze a writing concept that stands https://iacademicessay.com/ out from your exploratory reading and discussion. You are encouraged to concentrate on a writing concept you believe in, are inspired by, or that has played a role in your experience so far.

Or on the flip side, you may frame your exploration to focus on a writing concept you dislike, have been confused by, or that has been an obstacle to your writing. For example, you may choose to re-think a common assumption that good writers are born that way without trying, and that some people just aren’t good at writing and never will be. The form your writing takes will depend on the rhetorical situation. What that means is that your choices about form will depend on your sense of audience, the concept you choose to explore, the claims you wish to make, the insights you plan to share, and the context in which your audience will be reading it.

For example, if you were to take up the concept that writers will always have more to learn and planned to claim that good writing comes as the result of practice or frequent failed attempts rather than the result of natural talent, you may choose to share such a message with other writers who lack confidence or with writers who are over-confident. https://getacademicessay.com/ And you’d have to think about the best way to reach them. ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍

Purpose In sum, this assignment challenges writers to explain a writing concept, provide examples of the concept in action, define terms associated with the concept, address common misunderstandings related to the concept, and explain in some detail how your chosen writing concept might help writers as they face new or challenging situations. Note: Writing about Writing refers to “threshold concepts” as ideas that transform thinking and that help to integrate and bring together many other ideas. To be an expert in a field is to understand the threshold concepts of that field. (See Criteria for Success on next page.) CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS A successful concept analysis ? Focuses consistently on 1-2 writing concepts that have emerged from reading, discussion, and experience. ?

Examines and connects ideas that come from experience to ideas that come from reading and discussion. ? Makes thoughtful claims about a writing concept and supports them with meaningful examples. ? Projects a sense of audience and purpose. ? Exceptional assignments not only maintain a consistent and thoughtful focus on a concept but also connect their experience to reading and research. They make claims, provide reasons, and use examples that help readers share in the experience and gain knowledge.

They project a very clear sense of audience. ? Competent assignments focus on 1-2 concepts and offer some ideas from readings and some connection to experience, but the integration is not as thorough. They make claims, but reasons and/or examples are not as strong. They are less aware of audience. ? Satisfactory assignments focus on 1-2 concepts but tend to think about experience and ideas from reading separately. They report information without making strong claims, and examples and reasons for their thinking are minimal.

Readers find it harder to understand the significance of the concept and experience. ? Assignments that do not meet expectations have generally left out significant parts of the analysis, either by not focusing, not connecting to the ideas in the readings, or by not supplying examples to help readers relate ‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‍‌‍‍to the ideas.

 Instructions

Part A)

Imagine you are a junior researcher at a world-renowned, high-tech laboratory. The senior scientist asks that you critique and replicate an experiment within the software defined networking, mobile computing, or Internet of Things domain to demonstrate your research and technical prowess to the group. They have not specified which experiment to analyze; however, they stipulate that it must be found within a peer-reviewed publication within the last ten years and ask that you produce a short report presenting your critique and experience replicating the experiment.

First, locate a research study that contains a reproducible experiment taking the time and resource constraints of the course into consideration.

Second, analyze the original study and address the items described below:

• Describe the problem addressed. Why is it important? Is this an agreed-upon problem?
• Describe what was accomplished by the study. What was not achieved?
• Describe the methodology the study utilized. Was it appropriate? Justify.
• Describe the study results and the contribution it made to the body of knowledge, if any.
• Describe possible extensions to the research, if any. In what ways can the study be enhanced or modified to provide additional value? Discuss any limitations or assumptions held within the study and how they can be addressed.
• Present the study’s experiment that will be reproduced. Be sure to outline the setup and resources utilized.
• Describe how you will reproduce the experiment. How does your experiment differ from the original? In what ways were they the same? How do your results compare with the original results, and what conclusions can be drawn with the additional data provided by your experiment?
• Finally, reproduce the experiment and document the setup, procedure, and results. Create any tables, graphs, raw results, or aggregate reports that would allow for direct comparison with the original study.

Ensure that your critique is comprehensive and meets the quality expectations of doctoral-level work.

References: Included a minimum of five scholarly resources

Length: 5-7 pages, not include title and reference pages

Part B)

Very frequently, new research and ideas are presented in the form of posters. This serves as a way for the presenter to both convey their idea, but importantly receive feedback as well. Your next task for the week is to create a poster presenting your idea. Begin by reviewing this week’s resources on how to create a poster and be sure to follow the guidelines as discussed in these resources. You should then record a brief (2-5 minute) recording of you presenting your idea using your poster.

Submit your original study (in PDF format), your critique, experiment outputs, poster, and screencast, by clicking the Submit to Dropbox button.

For your Module 3 SLP assignment, continue to do research on the company that you wrote about for Modules 1 and 2. For this assignment, you will be estimating the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) for your chosen company. The final calculation will be fairly straightforward, as it involves just plugging in some numbers into an equation. However, the more challenging task will be finding the necessary numbers to plug into the formulas. You will need information such as the beta for your company, the bond-rating, and various information from its balance sheet. Links to some suggested Web pages for finding this kind of information is included in the instructions, but you might be able to find other sources of information. Go step by step and present your information for Steps 1-4 below in a Word document. Make sure to show all of your steps one by one and include the sources of your information:

1. Find out your chosen company’s credit rating. Rating agencies such as Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s assign ratings to companies. AAA is high, AA is lower, BBB is even lower, etc. The higher the rating, the lower the cost of debt capital. Explain what your company’s credit rating is and the reasons for the high or low rating based on your research. Also, use the Fidelity Fixed Income Web page to find out what the current return is for a 30-year bond for a corporation with the rating that your company has. This yield will be the approximate cost of debt capital for your company. We will call the cost of debt RD.
2. Now estimate the cost of equity for your company. First you will need the beta; you already found this for your Module 1 SLP. You will also need the three-month treasury bill yield, which we will use as our measure of the risk-free rate. This rate should be listed on the Fidelity Fixed Income Web page linked above. Finally, you will need the equity risk premium. You can find estimates of this on many Web pages including Fidelity Fixed Income or Gutenberg Research. It is usually around 5%. Once you have this information, you can estimate the cost of equity as the 30-year treasury bill yield rate plus beta multiplied by the equity premium:

   Cost of Equity = risk-free rate + Beta * (Equity Premium).

   Show your calculations. We will call the cost of equity RE.

3. Now find out how much of the firm’s capital is equity and how much is debt. For the total value, look at the balance sheet for your company as found on Google Finance or a similar Web page. The total value of your company will be “total liabilities and shareholder’s equity.” The proportion of debt will be total liabilities divided by total value, which we will call D/V. The proportion of equity will be shareholder’s equity divided by total value, or E/V. If you calculate them correctly, the proportions will add up to one.
4. Now we have all the information we need to get at least a rough ballpark estimate of WACC. Let’s assume a corporate tax rate of 35%. So the formula we will use is WACC = (E/V)* RE +(D/V)* RD *(1-.35)

   Calculate WACC and show your computations. As a “reality check” on your calculations, the WACC should likely be in the single digits and positive. Compare what you found to the average WACC in your company’s industry, which should be available on Web pages such as Cost of Capital by Sector (US). Note that 35% is the official corporate tax rate, but many corporations find tax breaks. If your WACC is too low, try computing it with a lower tax rate such as 25% or 10%.  

SLP Assignment Expectations

• Answer the assignment questions directly.
• Stay focused on the precise assignment questions. Do not go off on tangents or devote a lot of space to summarizing general background materials.
• For computational problems, make sure to show your work and explain your steps.

Please read attached materials file. It explains what is needed for this assignment

Assignment 2: RA 2—Health Communication Campaign

You will now apply what you have learned in this course by developing a plan for a health communications campaign. For this original plan, you will integrate work from previous assignments.

For this assignment, assume you are making a professional presentation to gain community support for your health communications campaign. Complete the following:

• Compile all your module assignments for reference.
• Design your health promotion campaign for your chosen public health issue.

Be sure to include the following as part of the campaign:

• A separate executive summary in MS Word format. Download and review the executive summary template that you will use for this assignment.
• A PowerPoint presentation that includes the following: 
  • A title page
  • At least one slide each for the following major sections: 
    • Preliminary analysis: Overall program goal
    • Outcome objectives: Behavioral, social, or organizational
    • Situation analysis and audience profile
    • Communication objectives
    • Communication strategies
    • Tactical plan: Messages, channels, materials, and activities
    • Evaluation plan
  • Notes for each slide section to provide detailed content and narrative
  • An attached list of examples and scholarly references

Write a 1–2-page executive summary in Word format. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A2.doc.

Develop a 10–15-slide presentation in PowerPoint format. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A2.ppt.

Week 4 Assignment Instructions

Tutor MUST have a good command of the English language

Please read all the instructions and requirements

Sources need to be less than five years old and journal/scholarly articles. 

No textbook or direct quotes 

All the Rubric requirements listed MUST be met.

***I have attached the  DPI Project Milestone: 10 Strategic Points for the Prospectus, Proposal, and Direct Practice Improvement Project Assignment with the instructor’s corrections/comments. This needs to be revised as well meeting the instructor’s expectations. 

Details:

Empirical research is the foundation of scholarly research and scholarly writing. An empirical article is defined as one that reports actual results of a research study. An empirical article includes a description of the study, an introduction, a research question, an explanation of the study’s methodology, a presentation of the results of the study, and a conclusion that discusses the results and suggests topics for further study.

As you search the library for scholarly research, you should limit your search to identify empirical articles. (You can use the “Empirical Research Checklist” from DNP-801 to assist in this determination.) After finding an empirical study, begin to assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the conclusion answers the proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

As you move forward in your doctoral journey, you will read research papers that will require you to assess the validity of the studies in question. To accomplish this, qualitative assessments about the research must be made by comparing, contrasting, and synthesizing what the research says.

In this assignment, you will continue to develop the skill of writing, by reviewing 15 research articles associated with your chosen topic and using the content to identify at least five major concepts and subthemes related to your topic.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of this assignment:

• Use      the “Empirical Research Checklist” to assist in the      determination of empirical articles.
• Use      the “Research Article Chart” to provide a summary review of each      component of your assignment.
• Doctoral      learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The      APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This      assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the      assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful      completion.
• You      are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the      directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Part 1: Selection of 15 Articles 

Select 15 empirical articles related to your PICOT question. Use the “Empirical Research Checklist” worksheet to ensure that each article you select meets all of the established criteria. At least one article must demonstrate a quantitative methodology.

Clinical/PICOT Question: 

In Patients > 65 years of age with central line catheters, how does staff training of key personnel and reinforcement of central line catheter hub hygiene after its insertion, along with the apt cleansing of the insertion site, reduce the incidence of CLABSIs (Central Line Associated Blood-stream Infections) at a level two trauma facility compared to standard care over a one-month period? 

P: Patients > 65 years of age with a central line

I: Staff training and reinforcement of central catheter, hub hygiene 

C: Compared to standard care 

O: Reduce the incidence of CLABSIs (Central Line Associated Blood-stream Infections)

T: A period of one-month

Part 2: Research Article Chart

Using the articles acquired in Part 1, provide a summary review of each component using the “Research Article Chart” template.

Part 3: Synthesis of Research Studies

Based upon your review of the 15 research articles, identify at least five major concepts that relate to your project topic, and three subthemes related to each concept.  

Using the information from the completed “Research Article Chart,” and the major concepts and subthemes you have identified, write a 2,000-3,000 word paper that synthesizes the content of the 15 research studies.

Summarize each major concept and focus on providing a detailed synthesis of the three identified subthemes that support that concept by addressing the following.

1. Introduction      of the identified subtheme
2. Summary      of the research questions posed by the studies
3. Summary      of the sample populations used
4. Summary      of the limitations of the studies
5. Summary      of the conclusion and recommendations for further research