After you gain familiarity with the Eclipse environment, you are  going to write a very simple Java program, and run it using Eclipse.  Following is the sample code.

Note that the name of the following Java program is HelloWorld.java.  The spelling of HelloWorld must be exactly the same as to the word next  to “public class.” Be careful about the upper and lowercase, in Java,  uppercase and lowercase does make a difference. And by tradition, the  first letter of the class should be in upper case.

public class HelloWorld

{

        public static void main(String[] args)

       {

                 System.out.println(“Hello World, this is my first Java class”);

        }

}

Case Assignment

Write a java program to display a greeting message and name it as  greetings.java. The message needs to include the following information:  your name, city you live in, your profession, and what you would like to  do in your spare time etc. Once you are done with debugging and running  the program, copy a screen shot of the output along with the java  program, paste it to a word document, and submit the word document to  dropbox.

Note: use sample program as reference to prepare for this programming assignment.

Assignment Expectations

• The program should use both System.out.print and System.out.println methods
• The program has no compiling errors.
• The program displays the greeting message required.

********PLEASE READ **********

******* Please submit (upload) your Case and SLP assignments in two files:
1.  A screenshot of the full Eclipse window, with the (numbered) source  code and the output clearly visible. The screenshot should be taken and  pasted into the Word (LibreOffice etc.) document and submitted as .DOCX  file.
 The output is typically displayed in the console below the source code or to the right of the source code.
Make sure all is included in your screenshot.  

2. You also have to upload your source code as a separate .TXT file  (written in Word, WordPad or similar, (but not in Notepad). Another  option is to include your source code as a plain text in the .DOCX  document referred to in (1).

3. You DO NOT need to submit .JAVA file.

You are required to place comments in your JAVA source code. 

  In regards to separation of duties (from your readings), answer the following questions:

• Why should duties be segregated?
• How can management determine if duties are properly segregated?
• What if management has inadequate staff to properly segregate all duties?
• Find and share an example (news article online) where separation of duties would have prevented an insider threat from exploiting a system.  Describe how you would have prevented this incident.

For this week, you need to respond to 2 of your peer’s initial responses.  Your replies need to be more than 1 or 2 sentences to obtain credit for posting.  Describe how you agree or disagree with their post.  Add to their post, but do not attack their position.  In your reply, support how your peer would have prevented the incident they presented, or another method for preventing the insider threat.  Be sure to describe your solution.  In total, you need to have more than 3 posts (your initial and 2 replies to receive full credit).————————————————————————————————1.  COLLAPSEWhy should duties be segregated?Separation of duties is a method to manage conflict of interest. This can be achieved by segregating the roles, responsibilities and privileges for specific security processes among multiple employees.How can management determine if duties are properly segregated?management should verify these points:Who maintains possession of the asset?Who authorizes transaction approvals?Who is responsible to record the transactions into ledger?What if management has inadequate staff to properly segregate all duties?If the management has inadequate staff, mitigating controls should be used to decrease risk because there are chances that smaller groups cannot obtain ideal system. five employees each performing one of the five different duties. Find and share an example where separation of duties would have prevented an insider threat from exploiting a system.  Describe how you would have prevented this incident.In December 2013 over 40 million credit cards were stolen from nearly 2000 Targetstores by accessing data on point of sale (POS) systems.  From what is known about theTarget breach, there were multiple factors that led to data loss. vendors were subject tophishing attacks, network segregation was lacking, point of sale systems were vulnerableto memory scraping malware and detection strategies employed by Target failed. Apossible solution for preventing and mitigating similar breaches using a defense in depthmodel will be presented using a multi-layered security strategy.A series of steps were taken by the adversaries to obtain access to the credit carddata and retrieve it from Target’s systems. A break down in detection further increaseddata loss. Sources suggest the breach transpired as follows:Reconnaissance by attackers may have included a Google search that would have supplied a great deal of information about how Target interacts with vendors. Results would have revealed a vendor portal and a list of HVAC and refrigeration companies. This reconnaissance would have also revealed a detailed case study on the Microsoft web site that describes how Target uses Microsoft virtualization software, centralized name resolution and Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM), to deploy security patches and system updatesFrom this pivot point the attackers could have further infiltrated the network. The specific details are not available but we can speculate that the criminals used the used the attack cycle described in Mandiant’s APT1 report to look find vulnerabilities in the vendor portal move laterally through the network via back doors, reconnaissance and other vulnerable systems. Common network tools were used to do reconnaissance once inside the networkWhile the attack was in progress, monitoring software (FireEye) alerted staff in Bangalore, India. They in turn notified Target staff in Minneapolis but no action was taken. ReconnaissanceNetwork Infiltration and CommunicationFailure to respond to FireEye alertsSeparation of duties could have prevented this threat.

• prevented insiders from having end-to-end system knowledge or access.
• prevents access across different network layers.
• Separation of duties would have different people monitoring systems than those who have access to make changes to configuration.

Suggestions:An alternate outcome for the Target scenario was presented with Critical Controls in place. Steps taken by the attackers could have been stopped at many different points during the attack. Segregating the POS systems, end-to-end encryption, inventory of systems and detailed logging would have kept thieves away from credit card data. Proper encryption would have prevented card data from being read in memory. Adequate, welltrained staff with time to appropriately analyze logs would have uncovered the malware and network traffic to mitigate losses had the breach still occurred
2.
Importance of separation of duties  As the business grows so does the increase in levels of hierarchy of the company .This shows that any task cannot be done by a single individual , if done so that consumes most of the time to complete an operation . So segregation of duties creates an ease in business processes to get the tasks done efficiently and effectively and expose the risks involved in any particular task that are being carried out in any organization by a single employee i.e., for example, if transaction , billing and closing for a particular task are done by single individual , there is a risk factor involved of that individual exploiting the system  and can become unnoticed by any other employee or employer of the company. So any duty should be done by at least more than a single individual so that , the errors can be caught and prevent internal fraud in the business. Duties can also be segregated to assure that the transactions are correct , reported with accuracy and are adhering to rules and regulations of the company.Management and its review to determine proper segregation of duties  Management can record the end results of both prior to separation of duties and post separation of duties  and perform a final assessment to determine if duties are properly segregated or not.Challenges of management having inadequate staff  Not all processes require highly qualified personnel . So, few duties may just be  mitigated by imbibing mitigation controls in the system.Duties which can give us a least risk can be reduced by introducing mitigation controls into the system.Real time scenario and views on it On May 2013 , Edward Snowden’s whistle blowing regarding NSA ( National Security Agency ) documents can be taken as an example that might have mitigated threat to NSA , if proper prior strategies like segregation of duties are put into its system . According to ABC news , “Snowden was earlier appointed as a contractor with NSA who managed to download and steal an estimated 1.7 million confidential files”. According to Reuters , International News Agency’s article,Russian President said that “Snowden leaking the secrets is wrong but he is not a traitor “.The leak created direct or indirect knowledge gain among the public regarding the NSA surveillance operations.President Obama then urged to segregate a panel consisting of 5 experts to deal with the issue.The panel prepared 300 page report for the President with 46 recommendations which were far reaching .  To conclude , I would recommend being proactive instead of being reactive to the issue by practising strong internal controls, applying transparency in organizational processes,segregation of duties for all the tasks that are being performed in its operations and implementing employee evaluation practice under scrutiny to avoid internal threats in the organization.Thank You 

For 1 and 2  and need   minimum  3 Sentence of reply . 

Assignment 2.1: Liberty Challenged in Nineteenth Century America Thesis and Outline
Due Week 7 and worth 50 points

America became a free independent nation. With the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1783, the former mother country, England, recognized that its children, the colonies, were now on their own. A constitutional republic was birthed, and thus the challenges began. Slavery, the “Peculiar Institution,” was a monumental issue facing the country. Would it die or would it survive and possibly take a nation divided with it? This sectionalism followed Americans up into the Civil War. Dissect this crisis by addressing parts I and II below.

For the next part of this assignment you will create an outline of the main points you want to address in this paper. This will serve as the basis for your Assignment 2.2 Final Draft. (Note: Please use the Purdue Owl website to assist you with this assignment; this website can be accessed at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/2/2/55/.)

Part 1:

1. Write a thesis statement that is one to two (1-2) sentences long in which you:
   1. State your thesis on the significance of this slavery issue, as exemplified in your research. Justify your response.

For the first part of this assignment you will create a thesis statement. A thesis statement is usually a single sentence somewhere in your first paragraph that presents your main idea to the reader. The body of the essay organizes the material you gather and present in support of your main idea. Keep in mind that a thesis is an interpretation of a question or subject, not the subject itself. (Note: Please consult the Purdue OWL website with tips on how to construct a proper thesis; the website can be found at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/545/01/.)

Part 2:
For the next part of this assignment you will create an outline of the main points you want to address in this paper. This will serve as the basis for your Assignment 2.2 Final Draft. (Note: Please use the Purdue Owl website to assist you with this assignment; this website can be accessed at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/engagement/2/2/55/.)

2. Write a one to two (1-2) page outline in which you:

1. Describe two (2) outcomes of the 3/5ths Compromise, Missouri Compromise of 1820, Compromise of 1850, Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the Dred Scott Decision. Note: Be sure to provide two (2) outcomes for each legislation.
2. Suggest three (3) reasons why slavery was and is incompatible with our political and economic system.
3. List three to five (3-5) driving forces that led to the Civil War.
4. Use at least three (3) academic references besides or in addition to the textbook. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.

 Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Recognize the main factors that led to America’s early development.
• Identify and discuss the different ways that the heritages of slavery, the Civil War, and Reconstruction have shaped America’s history.
• Summarize and discuss the ways that formal policies of government have influenced the direction of historical and social development in the United States.
• Examine how changes in social and economic conditions and technology can cause corresponding changes in the attitudes of the people and policies of the government.
• Specify ways that women and minorities have responded to challenges and made contributions to American culture.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in American History to 1865.
• Write clearly and concisely about American History to 1865 using proper writing mechanics.

Click here to view the grading rubric.

https://app.junctioneducation.com/#/5ac0d3346934b623e7f7970c

please let me know if link works or not

Most people have opposite intuitive reactions to the two versions of the Trolley Problem (turning to a side track and pushing the fat pedestrian to block the trolley). Should we think about both cases the same way? Why or why not?

philosophy

Description

Suggested paper topics

PHIL 112 ETHICS  – L. Shanner

DUE:  FRIDAY DECEMBER 11, 2020 (last day of semester)

USE YOUR TEXTBOOK as your primary resource, supplemented by lecture notes.  You are welcome to add additional directly relevant materials, but please focus on course work first.  Talk with me if you have any questions about sources and/or redirecting your topic.

Format: 

· Length:  700-1000 words (about 3-5 pages).

· Please no cover pages – I’m using my own printer and paper

· Be sure your name is on the first page or header!

· Double spaced, standard font and margins.

o  Single-space and indent lengthy quotes or bullet-point lists. 

· References can immediately follow the end of your essay (to save my paper and printing), or you may have a separate bibliography https://myhomeworkassister.com/blog/ page.

· Save as Word or PDF document

Turning it in:  Either upload to VIULearn > Assignments or email to me with a subject line indicating your paper is attached.  Do NOT send it by reply to an email I send the class – it gets lost in the inbox that way.  Do NOT send me to Google docs or other dropboxes.

Goals:  Focus on a specific, limited aspect of course material covered so far, and work with it until you can decide whether you agree with it (partly or strongly), or perhaps how it would apply to a certain type of case.   Why are some ideas or authors making more sense to you than others?  What good reasons can you offer for me (or others) to agree with your assessment? (It does not matter whether I actually do agree with you or not!  I’m looking for clarity in your reasoning).  You will not solve these difficult, venerable questions.  Making progress on understanding them and fitting pieces together is excellent work. 

Citations:  Any standard citation format is acceptable (APA, MLA, Chicago Manual, etc).  My personal preference is footnotes or endnotes rather than in-text parenthetical (like this) references for readability, but APA style is fine. https://trustedessayhelpers.com/essayquestions/

· Acceptable Bibliography format: 

o Daniel DeNicola Moral Philosophy:  A Contemporary Introduction (Peterborough ON: Broadview 2019) p. 87.

o Laura Shanner “Ethical Theories in Bioethics and Health Law” in M.J. Dykeman (ed) Canadian Health Law Practice Manual (Toronto: Butterworths 2000). Chapter 1, s. 1.11.

o Laura Shanner, lecture slides “Utilitarianism 1” October 5, 2020, #8.

· PAGE NUMBERS ARE ESSENTIAL.  Each citation for a quote or paraphrase should give the specific page number where the quote is found.  For parenthetical citations: “…but can they suffer?” (107).

· Be very clear about whether you are quoting an original author quoted in our text, or the editor of our textbook.  Credit the person who said it, then give the citation to the edited or 2nd-hand source.

· Page numbers refer to the textbook, not the original publication date of the original work. 

· Note that APA simplified a few things last fall:  No need for “Running Head:” headers.  First author’s name only, instead of a list of names, even in first parenthetical reference. 

Essay Topics:  Choose ONE of the following topics.  If you want to write on a topic other than one of these, you need to discuss it with me first.

1. Most people have opposite intuitive reactions to the two versions of the Trolley Problem (turning to a side track and pushing the fat pedestrian to block the trolley).  Should we think about both cases the same way? Why or why not?

2. A principle of non-interference (such as Star Trek’s “Prime Directive”) is a common feature of science fiction stories involving contact with alien cultures.   However, it is very hard to follow a principle of non-interference, especially when one (human or alien) group is clearly damaging the interests of others.  Do you think that a principle of non-interference should be absolute, without any exceptions? If not, what kinds of criteria or considerations should guide when to interfere?  How would you respond to a challenge that your criteria are merely your own cultural biases?

3. Imagine that you have discovered a Ring of Gyges, or Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak. Now apply either Existentialism or Virtue theory.  If nobody would know that you were the person who did something, what sorts of things would you likely choose to do? What do you think you SHOULD do? Why?

4. Consider the distinction between intrinsic and instrumental goods.  What (if anything) do you think is intrinsically valuable?  Explain why.

5. Existentialism declares that we have radical freedom; evolutionary theory claims that various behaviors are wired into our DNA, and other theories note how we are shaped by cultural norms.  Using what we have read and discussed so far – and NOT getting into the complicated metaphysics of free will and determinism (whew!) – how much freedom of choice do you think we humans actually have?  Put another way, which of the theoretical accounts of freedom/choosing that we have studied makes the most sense to you? Why?

6. Some ethical theories involve a vision of persons or selves as isolated, distinct and non-overlapping.  Other theories depict us as inherently interconnected, so that our “self” is partly formed by our relationships, community, environment, or other features in which we are embedded.  Which version of “self” makes more sense to you? Why?  What are the implications of this conclusion for you when you do ethics?

7. Hobbes and Locke give different accounts of the state of nature, which lead to different ethical conclusions.  Which author do you think offers the better account? Explain why.

8. Assess the list of rights granted in the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights (in our slide set).  Is this list reasonable and/or realistic? How does the distinction between positive and negative rights affect your assessment?  Is there anything you would add? Are there any identified rights that you think are not justified?

9. Do you think that (at least some) non-humans should be granted rights like those in the UN Declaration of Human Rights? If so, what kinds of rights might apply to what kinds of creatures?  If not, why not? Focus on ETHICAL rights claims, not legal rights.

10. Compare the notion of ethical detachment as described in Buddhism &/or Hinduism with Existentialism’s insistence on authenticity and actively embracing our freedom.  Do you think these ideas are completely incompatible, or are there some overlapping insights?