One Page

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/01/18/study_finds_large_numbers_of_college_students_don_t_learn_much   How do best practices and life collide? How can we engage students as learners and also understand their unique challenges and responsibilities in an increasingly diverse college community?   https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/11/opinion/how-we-are-ruining-america.html?action=click&contentCollection=Book%20Review&module=Trending&version=Full®ion=Marginalia&pgtype=article have you ever felt excluded from conversation because the turning phrases and vocabulary seemed to rule you out of that discourse? Is the topic about education and its various insider dialogues important to compassion, truth, community? Does higher education have ways that prevent people from access through unspoken but important boundaries that affect say the lower class kid from trying education?     here is two articales , this is for disscation bord write basd on your reading 

Cultural Competency

Using “Ten Quick Ways to Analyze Children’s Books for Racism and Sexism,” select a piece of children’s literature from the library or your own collection to evaluate for bias.  In 500-750 words, conduct a text analysis using the 10 guidelines mentioned in the article, defending your conclusion.  After you complete the analysis, in 100-150 words, describe where you think the text falls on the Cultural Competence Continuum and why. Submit both portions as one assignment. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. The rubic is attached   The link:  Ten Quick Ways to Analyze Childrens Books for Sexism And Racism Read “Ten Quick Ways to Analyze Childrens Books for Sexism And Racism ” by Derman-Sparks and the A.B.C. Task Force, located on the Teaching for Change website. http://www.teachingforchange.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/ec_tenquickways_english.pdf

Title: Politics Of Sociology & Planning A PlaygroundPaper Type EssayDeadline ( Remaining :: 0 Days, 4 Hrs, 10 Min )Paper Format APACourse Level College  Subject Area Sociology  # Pages 2   ( Or 550…

Title: Politics of Sociology & Planning a playground Paper type Essay Deadline ( Remaining :: 0 Days, 4 Hrs, 10 Min ) Paper format APA Course level College   Subject Area Sociology   # pages 2   ( or 550 words Minimum) Spacing Double Spacing Cost per page $ 9.00 # sources 1 Paper Details Watch “Planning a Playground.” http://media.pearsoncmg.com/pcp/pcp_82302_engleberg_uop_pp/ After watching this week’s videos, focus on the following questions in your collaborative group: What leadership theories and styles do you see in the videos? Were there any leadership strategies you identified? What would have been a helpful strategy in these videos? Discuss constructive and destructive conflict. How do they differ? What did you see with relation to these concepts in the videos? How would you increase cohesion for these teams?

Anna Martin

Anna Martin In chapter 4 of your textbook, you should have engaged in what we know about learning. One of the most powerful ways to demonstrate your knowledge of these concepts is to apply them in a real life setting. Please read the case study below and answer the questions in this forum. Part One Anna Martin is a young teacher, in her second year of teaching and first year in a second grade class. She has had great success working with students and she makes great connections with her students. On Monday, Anna found her district benchmark scores in her mailbox. These district benchmark tests are given three times a year, and they measure student growth on a series of standards based areas. The benchmark assessments include a math test, a special math problem solving assessment, a long reading exam, and a writing prompt. In her report she found a set of charts with all the students’ scores in columns across the page. The writing scores, however, weren’t on the chart because the teachers will be scoring those at the next staff meeting. The charts are an array of colors; with red scores indicating students who are below target, green for those who have made the district target, and blue for those students who are working above grade level. Unfortunately, this time there is much more red and it seems like the students didn’t make “district growth.” What is the value of this assessment and what purpose does it serve? Who is this feedback for? Part Two Anna decided to take the benchmark scores home and look for signs of hope. The district gave her an Excel file and her first step was to sort the students from highest score to lowest. “What will sorting do for me?” she asked. She already had the students organized in reading and math groups by their academic levels. But she remembered how huge the chart seemed. She feels a bit overwhelmed and wondered if there was better way to organize this list. Taking one academic area, how might Anna organize the data? What is the final result that this teacher might be trying to achieve? Part Three Anna decided to focus on one area, the reading test. First, she sorted the students by overall reading score. By doing so, she saw some persistent problems: Vocabulary and Word Analysis, or for another group of students, problems in Reading Comprehension, and for some students they showed problems in both areas. For the past two months, Anna has followed the district adopted text book and put students in small reading groups based on reading level. The groups had worked through the intervention materials. The textbooks seemed to only ask the students comprehension questions that asked the students to answer questions about what happened. Anna looks at the Excel file and realized that the district test didn’t tell her anything except which student was low, which was high, or who was in-between. She wondered how she could get more information about how her students were trying to comprehend this material. What might be some of the underlying problems that have caused her results? What further data might help Anna and what might be missing in her approach and how could she get it? What else could Ann be doing to find out what she should be teaching her students? Part Four Anna decided she needed to get the students more directly involved. She wondered if she was using the teacher’s edition too much and thought about how she was responding when students made mistakes. She had posted the reading strategies on a wall she pointed to them when they made a mistake, and told them to focus on the skills. She told them a lot what they were doing right and what they were doing wrong. She thought about what else in the past month she could have done to see these patterns emerging. Lastly, before heading for the solace of a frozen yogurt, she wondered what her students would think, if anything, if she asked them about these results. What coaching questions come to mind if you were helping Anna? If Anna speaks with her students, what might she want to know from them? What kind of evidence might she gather before the next district benchmark? What would be the most important information she could get from her teammates at tomorrow’s meeting? Do you have any other thoughts on Anna’s assessments?  

Developmental Skills: PLEASE READ DESCRIPTION!!!!!

Student has ADHD, but is really smart he is in the 2nd grade. Teacher uses breathe and count method with student. Student also has an Aide. This is the student that will be “observed”!   Assignment must be turned into TURNITIN. Has had some hiccups in the past.    In 750-1,000 words, summarize the observation and analyze the child’s strengths and challenges. Include what methods the classroom teacher uses to address the developmental skills for the child observed. Include the following skills: Developmental-behavioral; Self-care, adaptive, independence; Social development; Speech, language, communication; and Pre-academic and cognitive learning. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines

I Need Help With Sports Questions

i need help answering these questions in 500 words.   here is the case and the discussion questions below:   Case Study Three: Refusal to stand for National Anthem before athletic event Colin Kaepernick is a quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers.   Watch 1:30 minute video and read short article to understand the case study: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000691077/article/colin-kaepernick-explains-why-he-sat-during-national-anthem   Video on Colin Kaepernick’s perspective: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laG1y6FpAhc   DISCUSSION QUESTIONS: Should athletic organizations punish players for acts of deviance and violence? Put “Yes” or “No” in the subject line of your post then reiterate your position in the post itself. Why or why not? Does it depend on the specific act? Explain. Who should determine which acts are in need of punishment (and how severe the punishment should be)?  

Research Theory, Design, And Methods (RSCH – 8110D – 8) Assignment N Discussion

Assignment need to be done on  Research Theory, Design, and Methods (RSCH – 8110D – 8)  due by tomorrow monday

Ethics And Law PowerPoint

Due 07/04/17 at 9:00AM CST     State Governance Structure PowerPoint Assignment   Assignment Guidelines:   STATE: NEW YORK This assignment will require students to conduct research utilizing the Internet in locating information from state-sponsored websites for public higher education on the governance structure of higher education. (Note: you do ‘not’ have to address ‘private’ colleges or universities in this assignment as the focus is on ‘public’ higher education within various states. Research the structure of Higher Education in your assigned state (NEW YORK) and create a powerpoint presentation detailing how the state structures higher education both among community colleges and 4-year colleges/universities. Be sure to evaluate the state structure in relation to the discussion in chapter 2. Please note whether the state uses a: 1) Governing Board, 2) Coordinating Boards, 3) Planning, Regulatory, and Service Agencies. The powerpoint presentation should be a maximum of 5 slides with a reference slide listing the internet. Each slide should contain a maximum of 7 lines of text. The font size should be 20 or higher to ensure easy readability of the presentation.  

5 Differentiated Lesson Plans

THIS IS MASTERS LEVEL WORK AND IS VERY IMPORTANT!! DO NOT TAKE THIS WORK IF YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW TO DO THE WORK !   FOLLOW ALL DIRECTIONS   1) Write 5 lesson plans that include instructional strategies for differentiating instruction. 2) Identify how they will differentiate instruction within the context of their unit. 3) Delineate how they will differentiate content, process and products based on the student characteristics of an inclusive general education classroom that includes students with disabilities, students who are English Language learners (ELL), students who come from impoverished families and students who are not literate in reading and mathematics. 4) Include one well-defined cooperative learning activity in one of your lesson plans.   Be sure to use the UbD framework when creating the lesson plans.    Use the provided lesson plan template to plan your unit lessons. Criteria Exceeding Expectations 4 Meeting Expectation Level 3 Developing 2 Emerging 1 Did Not Attempt 0 Instruction- Design & Implementation – Context  (CAEP 1.1.) (WVPTS: 1D2) (ACEI 3.2) DQP – Applied Learning 8% The candidate considers a broad variety of contexts in connecting concepts to learners’ prior experiences. The candidate considers an adequate variety of contexts in connecting concepts to learners’ prior experiences. The candidate considers a limited variety of contexts in connecting concepts to learners’ prior experiences.   The candidate considers a very limited variety of contexts in connecting concepts to learners’ prior experiences The candidate did not attempt. Instruction- Design & Implementation – Alignment  (CAEP 1.1.) (WVPTS: 1C1, 1C2, 3D1) (ACEI 3.1)   DQP – Applied Learning 10%   The candidate designs instruction that engages learners in meaningful instructional activities aligned to cross-curricular and multiple WV Next Generation Content Standards and Objectives and/or pertinent state standards. The candidate designs instruction that engages learners in meaningful instructional activities aligned to cross-curricular and/or multiple WV Next Generation Content Standards and Objectives and/or pertinent state standards The candidate designs instruction that engages learners in meaningful instructional activities aligned to the WV Next Generation Content Standards and Objectives and/or pertinent state standards.         The candidate designs instruction that engages learners in instructional activities that are aligned in very limited ways to WV Next Generation Content Standards and Objectives and/or pertinent state standards.         The candidate did not attempt. Instruction- Design & Implementation – Differentiation  (CAEP 1.1.) (WVPTS: 2A1, 1D1, 3A2, 4C1) (ACEI 3.2) (NCTM 4c) (ACTFL 3) DQP – Applied Learning 8%   The candidate effectively differentiates instruction based upon extensive knowledge of learners’ social, emotional, and academic needs; interests; learning styles; cultural heritage; and gender. The candidate adequately differentiates instruction based upon knowledge of learners’ social, emotional, and academic needs; interests; learning styles; cultural heritage; and gender. The candidate differentiates instruction in limited ways based upon knowledge of learners’ social, emotional, and academic needs; and/or interests; and/or learning styles; and/or cultural heritage; and/or gender.     The candidate differentiates instruction in very limited ways based upon knowledge of learners’ social, emotional, and academic needs; and/or interests; and/or learning styles; and/or cultural heritage; and/or gender.     The candidate did not attempt. Instruction- Design & Implementation – Learner Collaboration  (CAEP 1.1.) (WVPTS: 1D1) (ACEI 3.4. 3.5) DQP – Applied Learning 8% The candidate provides broad opportunities for learners to collaborate with peers.   The candidate provides adequate opportunities for learners to collaborate with peers. The candidate provides limited opportunities for learners to collaborate with peers.   The candidate provides very limited opportunities for learners to collaborate with peers.   The candidate did not attempt. Instruction- Design & Implementation  – Technology  (CAEP 1.1.) (ISTE: 2a, 2c) (WVPTS: 1D1, 3A2) (ACEI 3.5) (NCTM 4e) DQP – Applied Learning DQP – Digital Literacy 7% The candidate fully models and integrates technology. The candidate adequately models and integrates technology. The candidate partially models or integrates technology. The candidate minimally models or integrates technology. The candidate did not attempt. Instruction- Design & Implementation – Critical Thinking  (CAEP 1.1.) (WVPTS: 1D1, 3A2, 3D1) (ACEI 3.3) DQP – Applied Learning 8% The candidate designs multiple activities that effectively promote critical thinking.   The candidate designs at least one activity that effectively promotes critical thinking. The candidate designs at least one activity that adequately promotes critical thinking. The candidate designs activities that promote critical thinking in limited ways.   The candidate did not attempt. Assessment- Design & Implementation – Standards Alignment  (CAEP 1.1) (WVPTS: 1C2) (ACEI 4.0) DQP – Applied Learning 8% The candidate effectively aligns assessments to the lesson’s standards/ objectives and activities. The candidate aligns assessments to most of the lesson’s standards/ objectives and activities.   The candidate aligns assessments to the lesson’s standards/ objectives and/or activities in limited ways.     The candidate aligns assessments to the lesson’s standards/ objectives and/or activities in very limited ways.   The candidate did not attempt. Assessment- Design & Implementation – Modification  (CAEP 1.1) (WVPTS: 4C1, 1E2) (ACEI 3.2) (NCTM 4c) DQP – Applied Learning 8% The candidate effectively modifies assessments to meet the needs of all learners. The candidate adequately modifies assessments to meet the needs of most learners.   The candidate modifies assessments when the need is apparent.     The candidate ineffectively modifies assessments to meet the needs of learners.     The candidate did not attempt. Social Studies/ Field Content- Content in Lesson Planning (CAEP 1.1) (WVPTS: 1B1) (NCSS 1.1-1.10) (ACEI 2.1-2.7) (NCSS 1.1-1.10) (ACTFL 2, NCTE 2, NCTM 1a, NSTA 1a, or NASPE 3) DQP – Applied Learning 20% The candidate designs fully developed social studies lesson activities (or varied lessons in his/her field). The candidate designs adequately developed social studies lesson activities (or varied lessons in his/her field). The candidate designs partially developed social studies lesson activities (or varied lessons in his/her field). The candidate designs minimally developed social studies lesson activities (or varied lessons in his/her field). The candidate did not attempt. Instruction- Design & Implementation – Unit Planning  (CAEP 1.1.) (WVPTS: 1A1) (ACEI 3.1) DQP – Applied Learning 15%   The candidate designs a fully developed cohesive unit of instruction (5 connected lesson plans).  The candidate designs an adequately developed cohesive unit of instruction (5 connected lesson plans). The candidate designs a partially developed unit of instruction. The candidate designs a minimally developed unit of instruction.  The candidate did not attempt.

I Want 750-1000 Word Essay

750-1000 word essay required to be done on ‘CINEMATOGRAPHY’ Required URGENT