Information Systems Analysis

Please answer all 3 questions separately with 250+ words each and references. 

Thank you

1. Suppose you are explaining the concept of prototyping to your manager to persuade her to approve the prototype approach to a proposed system that you are working on. Her response to your explanation is that “prototyping is a waste of time and money”. As a systems analyst, how could you respond to her?

2.  A systems analyst junior in my organization just took a course in the Agile development. He liked the new approach and he really wanted to know how to decide which approach to follow for Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). He was debating whether it is better to use Waterfall or Agile for big projects. His thinking was that Agile should be used for big projects with non-sequential product development and for projects that are often prone to change in requirements and cost. Is he right?

3. ABC Inc. wants to build a new web site to sell their “clearance” products and they are planning to publish a proposed website site designed to obtain feedback from “potential customers”. The question is whether ABC Inc. should use a prototype to obtain feedback from “potential customers” about the proposed website. There are four available prototypes: patched-up, nonoperational, first-of-a-series, and selected features. What type of prototype is appropriate for ABC Inc. in this case? Explain why each type would apply (or would not apply) to this problem

Please answer all 3 questions separately with 250+ words each and references.  Do not combined all 3 question into one report.  Thank you

Negotiation

  • Individual written Assignment
  •   Material:

1. Case titled “BARGAINING PRICE WITH THE CHINESE” (Rob March) page 2  Answer ALL the following questions:

  1. “He realized the value of thinking like one’s opponent – seeing things as they do.” Explain what this means and give some examples to illustrate this view.
  2. “The Chinese insisted that custom required the visitor—Glazer—to make the first presentation. This he did, even though he was accustomed to allowing his opponents to speak first” What are the advantages and drawbacks of making the first offer?
  3. “Glazer could hardly believe that he had lowered his price twenty per-cent that week”: What does this tell you about Glazer’s ZOPA?
  4. What can we ‘assume’ about the way Glazer did his due diligence? Evaluate the approach.
  5. Name three tactics the Chinese used in the second meeting. Evaluate briefly how Glazer dealt with them.
  6. “Glazer remembered the tight deadlines he had faced on previous trips to China; now positions had been reversed, with the Chinese facing the
    pressures and deadlines.”: What does this tell you about Glazer’s preparation strategy for the negotiation?
  7. ”For the first time, the Chinese made a counter offer. Auger-Aiso accepted, and agreement was reached” Why do you thing Auger Aiso agreed at
    this point?
  8. “He believed that Auger-Aiso had been awarded the contract because it had been the preferred supplier right from the start” How does this
    belief relate to understanding the difference between distributive and integrative bargaining?

digital 3

 https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Dirty%20Delete&fbclid=IwAR1Qur0JCWXDdQEk8t01NN0nIa11ZS8-qMo2t9mZpYUqqoDnFR6KHLaqcho

https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-crisis-management/

https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-crisis-plan/

What does the term “Dirty Delete” mean and how is it relevant to social media marketers when they are trying to manage their online communities? 

What are some best practices for managing a social media crisis?

  Using #DigitalPowerups 

you must (1) identify each #DigitalPowerup used in your responses by using the appropriate bolded #hashtag AND you must (2) actually apply the powerup correctly based on the instructions below.

  POWERUP 

  INSTRUCTIONS  you should aim to write about one paragraph per powerup. You will be graded based on the numbers of powerups correctly and meaningfully applied to the discussion. 

???? Remember

·   List or restate something from the content presented; then, add an opinion in your response. Use #remember

???? Understand

·   Ask a question regarding something you are unsure about related to the content presented (also explain why you are unsure about it or think it is worth understanding), and provide your best guess at an answer. Use #understand

????️ Apply

·   Organize the content presented into something new. This could take the form of a table, chart, timeline, diagram, model or other visualization. To get credit for this powerup, you must actually organize the content into something new, not just post something you found online. If adding a visualization, it must be embedded, not attached. Use #apply

???? Analyze

·   Examine a quote or an excerpt from the content presented, and then compare it to a different source. Explain why you think they’re related. To get credit for this powerup, you must actually compare it to a different source and include the source for reference. Use #analyze

⚖️ Evaluate

·   Critique something from the content presented in a respectful manner. Cite evidence to support your critique in your response. To get credit for this powerup, you must actually include cited evidence. Use #evaluate

???? Create

·   Create something new based on the content presented.  You can use text, images, photos, video, screencasts, audio recordings, digital media, or other supplies in your creation. To get credit for this powerup, you must actually create something new, not just post something you found online. If adding a visualization, it must be embedded, not attached. Use #create

???? Connect

·   Connect the content presented to an issue or experience outside of this course. Think either globally or from your own personal experience and share how you feel it makes a relevant connection. Use #connect

Review the Week 6 Discussion Instructions. Select two of your colleagues’ Final Project Presentations that interest you. View the two presentations and address the questions outlined in the instructions for the Discussion (see below).

 

Discussion: Evaluation/Peer Feedback for Final Project

As discussed throughout this course, success in changing behavior depends on your ability to apply health-behavior theories and models to the development of specific strategies and health messages that target populations with a health issue. To be effective, you must also be familiar with the population you are targeting and the health issue they are experiencing.

As you’ve explored this week, evaluation is important in improving programs and strategies to meet the needs of individuals and populations. Evaluation helps health professionals answer these and related questions: How do we know if a health strategy is effective in achieving its program objectives? How do we improve health programs to make them more effective? Which initiatives should be funded? What works best in which settings?

In this Discussion, you will help to evaluate your colleagues’ suggested strategies for behavior change by giving and receiving feedback on the Final Projects. Feedback, whether given or received, should focus on the strengths of a presentation and areas for possible improvement. It should be constructive. Use the feedback prompts below to to identify the strengths of your colleagues’ Final Projects and to provide objective, constructive suggestions for improvement.

To prepare:

  • Review the Week 6 Discussion Instructions.
  • Select two of your colleagues’ Final Project Presentations that interest you.
  • View the two presentations and address the questions outlined in the instructions for the Discussion (see below).
By Day 5

Post comments for at least two of your colleagues. Address at least two of the following in your comments:

  • Is the health issue, health behavior, target population, and setting clearly described? Explain.
  • Is the health theory or model and/or its constructs explained? Explain.
  • Is the theory or model applied appropriately to the strategies? Explain.
  • Is the information about the health issue, behavior, population, and setting based on credible sources? Are the citations and references adequate and accurately cited according to APA Style? Explain.
  • Are the strategies appropriate for the targeted population? Is culture and literacy level of the intended audience considered? Explain.

Finally, summarize what you learned from the presentation, and identify at least one way that the presentation could be improved.

Review your colleagues’ responses to your presentation in the Week 6 Discussion Forum.

Reflect on what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of their comments.

Submission and Grading Information

Soap Note 1 “ADULT”Acute Conditions

  

Guidelines for Focused SOAP Notes

Use APA format and must include mia minimum of 2 Scholarly Citations.

Soap notes will be uploaded to Moodle and put through TURN-It-In (anti-Plagiarism program)
Turn it in’ s Score must be less than 15% or will not be accepted for credit; it must be your own work and in your own words. You can resubmit, Final submission will be accepted if less than 15%. Copy-paste from websites or textbooks will not be accepted or tolerated and will receive a grade of 0 (zero) with no resubmissions allowed. 

· Label each section of the SOAP note (each body part and system).

· Do not use unnecessary words or complete sentences.

· Use Standard Abbreviations 

S: SUBJECTIVE DATA (information the patient/caregiver tells you).

Chief Complaint (CC): a statement describing the patient’s symptoms, problems, condition, diagnosis, physician-recommended return(s) for this patient visit. The patient’s own words should be in quotes. 

History of present illness (HPI): a chronological description of the development of the patient’s chief complaint from the first symptom or from the previous encounter to the present. Include the eight variables (Onset, Location, Duration, Characteristics, Aggravating Factors, Relieving Factors, Treatment, Severity-OLDCARTS), or an update on health status since the last patient encounter. 

Past Medical History (PMH): Update current medications, allergies, prior illnesses and injuries, operations and hospitalizations allergies, age-appropriate immunization status. 

Family History (FH): Update significant medical information about the patient’s family (parents, siblings, and children). Include specific diseases related to problems identified in CC, HPI or ROS. 

Social History(SH): An age-appropriate review of significant activities that may include information such as marital status, living arrangements, occupation, history of use of drugs, alcohol or tobacco, extent of education and sexual history. 

Review of Systems (ROS). There are 14 systems for review. List positive findings and pertinent negatives in systems directly related to the systems identified in the CC and symptoms which have occurred since last visit; (1) constitutional symptoms (e.g., fever, weight loss), (2) eyes, (3) ears, nose, mouth and throat, (4) cardiovascular, (5) respiratory, (6) gastrointestinal, (7) genitourinary, (8) musculoskeletal, (9-}.integument (skin and/or breast), (10) neurological, (11) psychiatric, (12) endocrine, (13) hematological/lymphatic, {14) allergic/immunologic. The ROS should mirror the PE findings section.

0: OBJECTIVE DATA (information you observe, assessment findings, lab results). 

Sufficient physical exam should be performed to evaluate areas suggested by the history and patient’s progress since last visit. Document specific abnormal and relevant negative findings. Abnormal or unexpected findings should be described. You should include only the information which was provided in the case study, do not include additional data. 

Record observations for the following systems if applicable to this patient encounter (there are 12 possible systems for examination): Constitutional (e.g. vita! signs, general appearance), Eyes, ENT/mouth, Cardiovascular, Respiratory, GI, GU, Musculoskeletal, Skin, Neurological, Psychiatric, Hematological/lymphatic/immunologic/lab testing. The focused PE should only include systems for which you have been given data. 

NOTE: Cardiovascular and Respiratory systems should be assessed on every patient regardless of the chief complaint.

Testing Results: Results of any diagnostic or lab testing ordered during that patient visit. 

A: ASSESSMENT: (this is your diagnosis (es) with the appropriate ICD 10 code)

 

List and number the possible diagnoses (problems) you have identified. These diagnoses are the conclusions you have drawn from the subjective and objective data. 

Remember: Your subjective and objective data should support your diagnoses and your therapeutic plan.

Do not write that a diagnosis is to be “ruled out” rather state the working definitions of each differential or primary diagnosis (es).

For each diagnoses provide a cited rationale for choosing this diagnosis. This rationale includes a one sentence cited definition of the diagnosis (es) the pathophysiology, the common signs and symptoms, the patients presenting signs and symptoms and the focused PE findings and tests results that support the dx. Include the interpretation of all lab data given in the case study and explain how those results support your chosen diagnosis. 

P: PLAN (this is your treatment plan specific to this patient). Each step of your plan must include an EBP citation. 

1. Medications write out the prescription including dispensing information and provide EBP to support ordering each medication. Be sure to include both prescription and OTC medications. 

2. Additional diagnostic tests include EBP citations to support ordering additional tests

3. Education this is part of the chart and should be brief, this is not a patient education sheet and needs to have a reference. 

4. Referrals include citations to support a referral 

5. Follow up. Patient follow-up should be specified with time or circumstances of return. You must provide a reference for your decision on when to follow up. 

Individual/Group Individual

 

Individual/Group Individual
Length 800 words (+/- 10%)
Learning Outcomes a) Explain the importance of self- awareness and emotional intelligence, and analyse its impact on professional competencies
b) Integrate strategies to effectively interact with others in a diverse professional context
c) Identify and reflect on own strengths and their application in the business context
d) Reflect on feedback to identify opportunities for self-improvement and professional development
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of module 4.2 (week 8)
For Intensive (6 week) class: by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT
Sunday of Module 4.2 (Week 4)
Weighting 25%
Total Marks 100 marks
Context
A key to self-directed learning is reflection. Reflection enables the ability to examine situations in order to better understand the surrounding context and identify potential improvements for the future. https://charteredessay.com/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations/This assessment task builds on assessment 1 and 2 to further develop your awareness and reflective learning ability while also assessing your understanding of the topics covered in module 4. As with assessment 1 and 2, you must write your journal entry in the first person and should try to be as open and honest with yourself as you can.
Please also visit the Academic Skills blackboard page for an overview of reflective writing in higher education: https://laureate-
au.blackboard.com/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_20163_1&co ntent_id=_2498857_1&mode=reset
Instructions
This Assessment is comprised of –
Part 1 – An Interview with a class colleague as outlined below
Part 2 – A Reflective Journal based on that interview using the Guiding Questions
After completing the Learning Material on Diversity & Inclusion as outlined in the module 4.1 and on VUCA in Module 4.2, either select a class colleague or your learning facilitator will allocate pairs. https://legitassignmenthelp.com/2021/04/24/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations/ Aim for your class colleague to be different to you in at least 3 of the below social identify indicators.
PART 1:
Create a 5-7 minute podcast interview with another student (you will need to include a link to this podcast in your Assessment 3 with each student having 5-7 minutes.)
Find three ways that a class colleague is different to you in terms of social identity. These could be based on:
• Age
• Gender
• Cultural background
• Religion
• Indigenous – Aboriginal & Torres Strait Island background
• Disability
• Sexual orientation
• Socio-economic background
• Marital status / Relationship status In your interview use these Guiding Questions:
1. Tell me about your social identity.
2. What are you most proud of having achieved in your life?
3. What obstacles have you had to face?
4. Professional identity – what industry do you work in / or hope to work in?
5. What should your future employer know about the skills you have and your story to help build a diversity and inclusive workplace / industry in a VUCA world?

https://studenthome.work/2021/04/24/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations-assessment-reflective-journal-3-diversity-inclusion/
Remember to mention your names, date and times of the interview at the beginning of the recording.
PART 2:
Using the interview information and the theoretical concepts on Diversity & Inclusion & VUCA as outlined in the module 4 learning resources, compose your reflective journal entry outlining what you have learned from the interview:
1. What have you learnt about yourself from the results of this interview?
2. What specific theoretical concepts from this module give you the greatest understanding of your own approach to Diversity & Inclusion?
3. What competencies, skills and qualities will be most critical for you to achieve your future career goals in a VUCA world?
4. Explain which of your top 5 Gallup Talents would be most valuable in developing this competency.
References & Appendix
1. You need to include four references
2. At least two references must be from the sources in Module 4.1 & 4.2 which present the theoretical concepts identified, to support your ideas https://4assignmenthelpers.com/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations/
3. Include at least one additional resource about diversity that you believe is valuable to develop other people’s learning in relation to inclusion
4. Include in the appendix of your Assessment 3 a link to your recording and ensure it can be accessed by your learning facilitator. Alternatively upload the audio file (mp3) into the Submissions portal
5. Video interview files (such as mp4 or from phone or zoom) are also acceptable
6. Follow the APA 6th edition style of referencing to cite your academic resources and provide your reference list.
Submission Instructions
Submit your Reflective Journal 3: Diversity & Inclusion via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in BIZ102 Understanding People and Organisations. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
The Learning Rubric below is your guide to how your assessment task will be marked. Please be sure to check this rubric very carefully before submission.
Learning Rubric: Assessment 3- Reflective journal: Diversity & Inclusion
Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% Pass
(Functional)
50-64% Credit
(Proficient) 65-74% Distinction
(Advanced)
75 -84% High Distinction
(Exceptional)
85-100%
Diversity & Inclusion reflection and linkage to theory
40% http://yourassignmentprofs.com/2021/04/24/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations/
Journal entry demonstrates a limited attempt to reflect on the results of Diversity & Inclusion, with no/limited attempt to apply theoretical concepts and to use professional/personal experience examples to support ideas.
Journal entry demonstrates a basic attempt to reflect on the results of Diversity & Inclusion, with a basic attempt to apply theoretical concepts and to use
professional/personal experience examples to support ideas.
Journal entry
demonstrates an adequate reflection on the results of Diversity & Inclusion, with a critical application of theoretical concepts and
use of
professional/personal experience examples to support ideas. Journal entry
demonstrates a thorough reflection on the results of Diversity & Inclusion, with a critical and indepth application of theoretical concepts and
use of
professional/personal experience examples to support ideas. Journal entry demonstrates an expert reflection on the results of Diversity & Inclusion, with an in-depth, critical and meticulous application of theoretical concepts and use of professional/personal experience examples to support ideas.
Professional practice reflection
30%
Journal entry shows no or limited evidence of reflective thinking in regards to how gained insights from selfassessment could be used to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Journal entry shows some evidence of reflective thinking and generically articulates how gained insights from self-assessment could be used to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world. https://myhomeworksolution.info/2021/04/24/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations/
Journal entry shows evidence of adequate reflective thinking and generically articulates how gained insights from selfassessment could be leveraged to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Journal entry shows evidence of thorough reflective thinking and clearly articulates how gained insights from selfassessment could be used to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Journal entry shows evidence of thorough and critical reflective thinking and clearly articulates how gained insights from selfassessment could be used to improve student’s future professional practice in a globalised, VUCA world.
Structure and flow of ideas https://essaycove.com/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations/
20% Journal entry does not present sufficient information, ideas or evidence.
Journal entry lacks logical/clear structure and flow of ideas, making it difficult to understand.
Line of reasoning is unclear and difficult to follow. Journal entry presents information, ideas and evidence sufficiently, however these require further logic and clarity.
Journal entry has a sufficient structure, however flow of ideas are a challenge and can be difficult to understand.
Line of reasoning is passable, however, can sometimes be difficult to follow and requires clarity. Journal entry presents information, ideas and evidence clearly and logically.

https://austessay.com/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations/
Journal entry has a good structure, with a good flow of ideas.
Line of reasoning is of a good standard and easy to follow.
Journal entry presents information and arguments in a logical and clear way, which is well supported by evidence.
Journal entry has a very good structure, with a strong flow of ideas; opinions and ideas are expressed in a clear and concise manner with obvious connection to topic.
Line of reasoning is clear, logical and easy to follow. Journal entry is expertly presented; descriptive, concise and informative, exceptionally developed and well supported by evidence.
Journal entry has an excellent structure, with a strong, clear flow of ideas; engages and sustains the audience’s interest in the topic and
the reader can immediately grasp the relevancy.
Line of reasoning is excellent; demonstrating a clear, logical flow of ideas and arguments that are easy to follow.
Correct citation of key resources
10%
Does not use sufficient sources. https://yourassignmenthelpers.com/biz102-understanding-people-and-organisations/
Does not include correct references or intext citations; does not use APA 6th style.
Uses sufficient sources, however can be greatly improved.
Attempts to include references or in-text citations, however these are sometimes insufficient for research purposes, or incorrect; Shows good evidence of attempts to source information.
Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, however may contain minor citation or referencing errors. Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence.
Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, containing minimal and or no errors. Shows evidence of extensive scope for
sourcing evidence

Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, containing no errors.
uses APA 6th style, however may contain some citation or referencing errors.

week 2_mangerial economics

  Need for 2 students 

  1. Describe an investment decision you or your company has made. Compute the opportunity costs and benefits of the decision. Did your company make the right decision? If not, what would you do differently? Compute the NPV of the investment.

[Your post must be substantive and demonstrate insight gained from the course material. Postings must be in the student’s own words – do not provide quotes!] [Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word version of the paper for APA review] 

Activity #2

1. Describe two activities inside your organization, or one inside and one outside your organization, that exhibit economies (or diseconomies) of scope. Describe the source of the scope economies. How could your organization exploit the scope economy or diseconomy? Compute the profit consequences of the advice.2. Describe a pricing decision your company has made. Was it optimal? If not, why not? How would you adjust price? Compute the profit consequences of the change. 

Bullet points should not to be used. The paper should be at least 1.5 – 2 pages in length, Times New Roman 12-pt font, double-spaced, 1 inch margins and utilizing at least one outside scholarly or professional source related to organizational behavior. This does not mean blogs or websites. This source should be a published article in a scholarly journal. This source should provide substance and not just be mentioned briefly to fulfill this criteria. The textbook should also be utilized. Do not use quotes. Do not insert excess line 

SOCW wk 8 Assignment 2: Application: Process Recordings

  

SOCW wk 8 Assignment 2: Application: Process Recordings

A process recording is a written tool field education experience students, field instructors, and faculty use to examine the dynamics of social work interactions in time. Process recordings can help in developing and refining interviewing and intervention skills. By conceptualizing and organizing ongoing activities with social work clients, you are able to clarify the purpose of interviews and interventions, identify personal and professional strengths and weaknesses, and improve self-awareness. The process recording is also a useful tool in exploring the interpersonal dynamics and values operating between you and the client system through an analysis of filtering the process used in recording a session.

For this Assignment, you will submit a process recording of your field education experiences specific to this week.

I have provided the process recording templet and the intro to Mrs. K I also provided the list of skills This must also include social work theory MUST INCLUDE THEORIES My field experience is at sound options https://www.soundoptions.com/ This is a masters of social work class

Provide a transcript of what happened during your field education experience, including a dialogue of interaction with a client.

Explain your interpretation of what occurred in the dialogue, including social work practice or theories, and explain how it might relate to evaluation covered this week.

Describe your reactions and/or any issues related to your interaction with a client during your field education experience.

Explain how you applied social work practice skills when performing the activities during your process recording.

Milestone One Managerial Accounting

Overview

Successful entrepreneurs understand all aspects of business, especially costs and costing systems. In the course project, you will assume the role of the owner of a small business and apply managerial accounting principles to evaluate and manage costs related to your services within a costing system. In the first milestone of the project, you will determine and classify the costs necessary for opening your business.

Scenario

You plan to open a business manufacturing collars, leashes, and harnesses for pets. To begin, you will manufacture these in a standard style and size with plans to expand your range over the year. In a few weeks, you will present your company’s financial strategy to some key investors. To begin creating your strategy, you need to consider and record all the costs associated with operating your business. You have decided to use the job order costing system.

Prompt

Use the given operational costs in the Milestone One Operational Costs Data Appendix document to complete the first two tabs, “Cost Classification” and “Variable and Fixed Costs,” in the Project Workbook.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

  • Cost Classification. Accurately classify all your costs in the “Cost Classification” tab of your workbook.
    • Identify direct material, direct labor, overhead, and period costs. (Note: Fixed and variable costs have been classified for you.)
  • Variable and Fixed Costs. Complete the “Variable and Fixed Costs” tab of your workbook. (Note: Some costs are provided for you. Fill in only the missing costs.)
    • Determine your total variable cost per unit and the total fixed costs for each product. Show your work using calculations to the side of the table or using appropriate formulas in the table.

Guidelines for Submission

Submit the Project Workbook with the “Cost Classification” and “Fixed and Variable Costs” tabs completed. This file should be completed and submitted using Microsoft Excel.

I need help with a Business Law Final Research Paper

Please Please make sure this paper is ORIGINAL WITH AT LEAST 500 WORDS AND IS DUE BY 12.02.20 (4PM)

 

  • Paper Steps

    Step 1 – Locate case United States Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990).

    The full text of this case, along with numerous case briefs, commentaries, summaries, etc., may be found by simply entering the full name of the case into any major online search engine of your choosing.

    Step 2 – Read case. Review the following questions:
    • What was the ultimate numerical vote of the court?
    • When and how can life support be withdrawn?
    • How does death by refusal of treatment differ from suicide?
    • How does a living will work and when does it become of legal effect?
    • What is a health care directive and how does it work?

    Step 3 – After completing your research, summarize your answers, and, along with any other sources, if any, address and support your particular position/view on the following specific issues, and, specifically, how you would apply the Saint Leo University Core Values of Community, Respect, and Integrity into your actions. Be sure to use proper APA format for citations.
    1. What are the potential foreseeable financial, psychological, and medical, yet unintended, harmful consequences to one’s family and friends in failing to provide a properly executed will and living will prior to one’s final illness and death?
    2. What are the fundamental distinctions between recuperative medical care and palliative care? Who should be included in the decision to modify care from recuperative to palliative? When, if ever, is the right to refuse any and all medical care appropriate when such virtually ensures the death of the patient?
    3. What professionals, medical or otherwise, should be involved in advising decisions concerning end-of life wishes? How does euthanasia differ from a simple cessation of treatment? Who should make end of life decisions for those who are without a family member to take on such a role?
    4. What measures can be taken to ensure the quality of ongoing family and social relationships, individually and as a group, to end-of-life patients? What pitfalls are to be avoided in ensuring maintenance of these relationships? What actions may be taken to ensure the spiritual and existential dimensions of the process are respected and integrated?
     

  • Final Paper
  • Completing the assigned readings, along with any other sources, if any, of your  choosing, address and support your particular position/view on the specific issues provided, and, specifically, how you would apply the Saint Leo University core values of community, respect, and integrity into your actions. Be sure to use proper APA format for citations.
    You must submit this assignment as a Word document to the appropriate course Assignment box.  (This Assignment box basket is linked to Turnitin.)
  • Term Paper: Review all materials in Chapter 52 and conduct research on the United States Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990). The full text of this case, along with numerous case briefs, commentaries, summaries, etc., may be found by simply entering the full name of the case into any major online search engine of your choosing. Alternatively, you may use Westlaw, Lexis or any other professional legal research databank in your research, however, use of such is not required. Following your research, review the following questions: • What was the ultimate numerical vote of the court? • When and how can life support be withdrawn? • How does death by refusal of treatment differ from suicide? • How does a living will work and when does it become of legal effect? • What is a health care directive and how does it work? After completing your research, summarize your answers, and, along with any other sources, if any, address and support your particular position/view on the following specific issues, and, specifically, how you would apply the Saint Leo University Core Values of Community, Respect, and Integrity into your actions. Be sure to use proper APA format for citations