Discussion Board on Middle Adulthood

Interview a middle-aged adult, using the following questions:

  1. Tell me about a high point in your life.
  2. Tell me about a low point in your life.
  3. Tell me about a turning point in your life.
  4. What are some important events that occurred in your childhood, adolescence, and adulthood?

In one paragraph summarize the responses from the interview.

In the second paragraph compare the responses to research in the text and discuss the following questions:

  1. Were life experiences generally positive or negative?
  2. Was there evidence of a commitment story? If so, describe.
  3. When did the turning point occur?
  4. Is this consistent with the midlife transition?
  5. Based on the answers, would you describe this person as generative? Why or why not?

The answer to each DB must be at least 250 words – that is the minimum required to fully answer the questions. Each answer must demonstrate critical thinking and writing at a college level. Good grammar and spelling are important. The answer must completely address all issues raised in the activity description and information from another source must be cited in APA format.  

 Above and beyond what was specified in the assignments. Is extraordinarily thorough and well-written. Include specific references and is thoughtful. Writing is clear and precise and has few grammatical/spelling errors. Demonstrates understanding of course content knowledge and application of course content within course framework using prior knowledge and >3 examples from course content and other resources when applicable. Includes critical thinking and synthesis. Connects course concepts with other concepts in the subject matter area. APA format with no more than 1 error.

BF

This assignment seeks to assess your understanding and application of the knowledge and principles learned in this module.
You are required to undertake a comprehensive study to demonstrate the concepts learn in this module.

Select a country of your interest.

Discuss the roles of the banking and finance sector in economic development in the selected country.

Introduce the growth and development of any two financial markets (e.g. money market, stock market, bond market) in the selected country. Discuss the relative importance of these markets to the development of economic.

Discuss the general impact of pandemic on the banking and finance sector. Prepare a written report of 2500 words (+/-10%) to show your findings.

Your report should be structured as follow:

  •   Introduction
  •   Role of banking and finance sector
  •   Growth and development of 2 financial markets
  •   General impact of Pandemic on banking and finance sector
  •   Conclusion
  •   Reflective Statement

Additional guidance notes

  •   The report should be supported by relevant data, table or graphs collected from
    various sources to support the analysis.
  •   You must demonstrate reading and research far beyond the material discussed in the
    lectures.
  •   You should ensure careful citation of all paper and electronic sources of information.
  •   A list of references following Harvard Referencing system should be attached to the
    end of the report.

sociology discussion homework 2

 

READ: The Promise from the Sociological Imagination by CW Mills.pdf

Actions

Don’t forget to refer to the Discussion Board Check List.pdf 

Actionsfor this (and every) discussion this semester.

Finally, note that from this discussion on, you will be unable to read or comment on posts made by your peers until you have published your own response to this discussion prompt.

“The sociological imagination enables us to grasp history and biography and the relations between the two within society.  That is its task and its promise.”

That’s an ambitious agenda but, even as a beginner, you can begin to realize that promise by asking three sorts of questions: those referring to structure, history and biography. When asking these three basic questions, you need to differentiate between the two basic elements of society (biography and history).  Differentiate between the “personal troubles of the milieu” and the “public issues of structure.”

  • Troubles occur within the character of the individual and within the range of his immediate relations with others.
  • Issues have to do with matters that transcend the local environments of the individual and the range of his inner life.

Answer the following questions based on the contemporary world (large or small, local or global) that YOU live in.  You may focus on one aspect of a particular society (small-scale) or the entire society as whole.  Please be sure to indicate how you’re defining society and/or if you’re focusing on one narrow subsection of a type of society:

1. STRUCTURE: What is this structure of this particular society as a whole? What are the essential component parts? How do these parts relate to one another? How does this society differ from others?

2. HISTORY: Where does this society stand in human history?  What are the essential features of this historical period?  How did/does social change happen? What macro (large-scale, structural) trends cause social problems?

3. BIOGRAPHY: What varieties of men and women now prevail in this society and in this period? How is human behavior changing? In what ways are social characteristics shaped? Which characteristics are encouraged and which are repressed?  How is human “nature” shaped by society’s dominant institutions?

4. Write a ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY on the main point of the reading. In other words, what IS the “sociological Imagination” or sociological perspective he is outlining in the article?

Facebook Live Killings

 

Read the article Cleveland Shooting Highlight’s Facebook’s Responsibility in Policing Depraved Videos found at: http://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/cleveland-shooting-highlights-facebook-s-responsibility-policing-depraved-videos-n747306

Write a four to five (4-5) page paper in which you:

  1. Discuss whether or not you believe that Facebook has a legal or ethical duty to rescue a crime victim.
  2. Suggest and elaborate on three (3) ways that social media platforms can be more proactive and thorough with their review of the types of content that appear on their sites.
  3. Propose two (2) safeguards that Facebook and other social media platforms should put into place to help prevent acts of violence from being broadcasted.
  4. Conduct some research to determine whether or not Facebook has an Ethics Officer or Oversight Committee. If so, discuss the key functions of these positions. If not, debate on whether or not they should create these roles.
  5. Propose two (2) changes Facebook should adopt to encourage ethical use of their platform.
  6. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference and proprietary Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze and apply the concepts of ethical decision-making, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in law, ethics, and corporate governance.
  • Write clearly and concisely about law, ethics, and corporate governance using proper writing mechanics.

SOCW 6311 Week 3 Assignment: Creating a Single-System (Subject) Design Study

  

Assignment: Creating a Single-System (Subject) Design Study

The steps at the heart of single-system (subject) research are part of the everyday practice of social work. Each day social workers implement interventions to meet clients’ needs and monitor results. However, conducting proper single-system (subject) research entails far more than these simple day-to-day practices. Proper single-system research requires a high degree of knowledge and commitment. Social workers must fully understand the purpose of single-system (subject) research and the variations of single-system (subject) design. They must develop a hypothesis based upon research and select the right design for testing it. They must ensure the reliability and validity of the data to be collected and know how to properly analyze and evaluate that data. This assignment asks you to rise to the challenge of creating a proposal for a single-subject research study.

To prepare for this Assignment, imagine that you are the social worker assigned to work with Paula Cortez (see the case study, “Social Work Research: Single Subject” in this week’s resources). After an initial assessment of her social, medical, and psychiatric problems, you develop a plan for intervention. You also develop a plan to monitor progress in your work with her using measures that can be evaluated in a single-system research design. As a scholar practitioner, you rely on research to help plan your intervention and your evaluation plan.

Complete the Cortez Family interactive media in this week’s resources. Conduct a literature search related to the chronic issues related to HIV/AIDS and bipolar mental disorder. Search for additional research related to assessing outcomes and theoretical frameworks appropriate for this client. For example, your search could include terms such as motivational interviewing and outcomes and goal-oriented practice and outcomes. You might also look at the NREPP database identified in Week 1, to search for interventions related to mental health and physical health.

Provide a 5-page proposal/research plan for single-system (subject) evaluation for your work with Paula Cortez. 

· Identify the problems that you will target and the outcomes you will measure

· Select an appropriate intervention or interventions (including length of time)

· Identify an appropriate evaluation plan.

Also, Include a description of:

  • The problem(s) that are the focus of treatment
  • The intervention approach, including length of time, so      that it can be replicated
    • A summary of the literature       that you reviewed that led you to select this intervention approach
  • The purpose for conducting a single-system (subject)      research evaluation
  • The measures for evaluating the outcomes and observing      change including:
    • Evidence from your       literature search about the nature of the measures
    • The validity and       reliability of the measures
    • How baseline measures will       be obtained
    • How often follow-up       measures will be administered
  • The criteria that you would use to determine whether      the intervention is effective
  • How the periodic measurements could assist you in your      ongoing work with Paula

Must contain at least 5 references and citations from the following Required Readings:

Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
Chapter 9, “Is the Intervention Effective?” (pp. 226-244: Read from “Client Satisfaction & Effectiveness” to “Target Problem Scale”)

Document: Corcoran, K., & Hozack, N. (2010). Locating assessment instruments. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed., pp. 65–74). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (PDF)
Copyright 2010 by Sage Publications, Inc.
Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Document: Mattaini, M. A. (2010). Single-system studies. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed., pp. 241–273). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (PDF)
Copyright 2010 by Sage Publications, Inc.
Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications, Inc. via the Copyright Clearance Center.

Read the following section:
“Social Work Research: Single Subject” (pp. 70–72)

Tankersley, M., Cook, B. G., & Cook, L. (2008). A Preliminary Examination to Identify the Presence of Quality Indicators in Single-subject Research. Education & Treatment of Children, 31(4), 523-548

Wendy lewis

This week you will research and read American Football League v. National Football League, 205 F. Supp. 60 (D. Md. 1962). You will need to find the case using Nexis Uni in our Library. You may also need to do additional research. Then, answer the following questions:

1. What was the case about? Summarize the background of the case. (20pts)

2. What law did the Court base their analysis on and why was it important? (20pts)

3. What was the outcome of the case? (10pts)

4. Did you agree or disagree with the outcome and why? (10pts)

5. Shepardize the case in Nexis Uni. Was there a later appeal, and if so what happened? (10pts)

Formatting (10pts)

Writing (10pts)

Citations (10pts)

Your paper should be single spaced, approximately 2-3 pages in length, 12 point Times New Roman font, with 1″ margins. You should put your name, date and student number at the top of the paper. A title page is not needed. Attach your paper here in Word format. It should be saved using your last name first in the file title. Ex) SmithCaseBrief.doc Citations should be in APA or Bluebook format. If you are a major in the Legal Studies Department, you are required to utilize Bluebook footnotes using the ‘insert footnote’ feature in Word. However, no reference list is needed. If you are a major that is not in the Legal Studies Department, you may use APA citations; however, you must include a reference list at the end of your paper. Attach your paper in Word format below. 

This week you will research and read Jason White, et al. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association. You will need to find the case using Nexis Uni in our Library. You may also need to do additional research. Then, please answer the following questions:

  1. What was the case about? Who did what to whom? Please include all facts the court considered significant. Summarize in your own words. DO NOT cut and paste from the opinion.
  2. What law did the Court base their analysis on and why was it important?
  3. What was the outcome of the case? 
    1. Did the court affirm the lower court’s decision, reverse it, and/or remand it for additional proceedings?
    2. Why did the court decide the case the way it did?
    3. What legal standard did they use or establish?
    4. What prior cases did the Court rely upon and why?
  4. Did you agree or disagree with the outcome and why?
  5. Is there anything else that should be mentioned about this case? Is it a “landmark” case? Was the court “divided”? What were your personal thoughts on the case?

Your paper should be single spaced, approximately 2-3 pages in length, and 12-point Times New Roman font, with 1″ margins. You should put your name, date and student number at the top of the paper. A title page is not needed. It should be saved using your last name first in the file title (e.g. SmithCaseBrief.docx). Citations should be in APA or Bluebook format. If you are a major in the Legal Studies Department, you are required to utilize Bluebook footnotes using the ‘insert footnote’ feature in Word. However, no reference list is needed. If you are a major that is not in the Legal Studies Department, you may use APA citations; however, you must include a reference list at the end of your paper. Please attach your paper in Wordformat below. 

For more information on case brief format, please see the resources attached below. The brief should be in your own words, so please do NOT include long quotes from the opinion itself.

References

White v. NCAA, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101374, 2006 WL 8066803 (United States District Court for the Central District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 2006, Filed).

Retrieved from https://advance-lexis-com.ezproxy1.apus.edu/api/document?collection=cases&id=urn:contentItem:59W4-1G91-F04C-T566-00000-00& 

context=1516831.

G. Summative Assessment #4

You will produce a clear and coherent writing that is well organized and edited. After reading and watching S.E. Hinton’s “The Outsiders” and “Fences” by August Wilson.  

In 350 words or more analyze the impact of the social norms of the 1950’s on the development of theme and character in both Fences and The Outsiders. Use at least two pieces of evidence to support your thinking. Make sure to cite correctly using MLA format. 16 points 

Use this sentence format below (fill in the blank, but be clear on what you type):

The 1950’s were a turbulent time in American history. The nation was rapidly changing as were American values.[Three events that happened in the 1950’s that shaped American values]. Although this time is often thought of as a period of prosperity not every American benefited during that decade. In fact two texts written much later would utilize those tensions in a subtle way, to explore the ideas of ___Topic #1____ and ____Topic #2__. 

Both The Outsiders and Fences deal with the topics of ____ and ____ by showing the development of their characters and build their themes through their actions and interactions. Although both stories take place in different parts of America and deal with different ethnic groups they resoundingly share the same theme that in order for a family to stay together they must be willing to change and sacrifice. A moment in __Title of text_____ that demonstrates this is when [Context for your evidence]“[Textual evidence” this [Analysis of text] (Citation). Similarly in ___Title & author____ there is a moment that _[synonym for displays]___ this theme when [Context for textual evidence].“[Textual evidence to support your claim” ]which shows [Analysis of textual evidence] (Citation). In addition this reinforces the social norm of the time that [Social norm shown in textual evidence].

On the other hand there are subtle differences between the texts when it comes to the topic of ___Topic #3___. In _Tiltle of text__ __Topic #3___ [claim about topic #3]. It is made clear to the reader that[claim about the differences between the text].[Contextualize the differences with an example]. [Reasoning for the different view on the topic]. The fierce 50’s are more than a half a century behind us but the themes and culture that emerged during that time can still be seen today.
 

PSY 600 Assignment 2 Week 2

I’ve had the flu I can barely stay awake I’m needing help! Please help instructions listed below article list attached

Choosing an Article for the Article Review Final Paper

This week, you will select an article to review for your final assignment in the course, the Aritcle Review, which is due in Week Six. Each article represents a topic and area of psychology. See the attached PSY600 Article Review List to read the articles and make your choice.

In your paper, clearly identify your article selection. Analyze psychology as a science as it is presented in your chosen article and explain why you have decided to focus on this particular topic. Assess the professional roles presented in the chosen article and describe the interactions between psychology professionals and professionals in other fields, if any. Explain any psychological theoretical perspectives presented in the article and why they are of particular interest to you.

The paper:

  • Must be one to two double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must address the topic with critical thought.
  • Must use at least one peer-reviewed source chosen from the PSY600 Article Review List
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate reference page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

GUIDED VIEWING Worksheet 3

Visit the State Hermitage Museum, in St. Petersburg, on Google’s Arts & Culture platform. Explore the collection and look at the different works of art on display.

From the collection, select two sculptures and respond to the series of questions provided to explore them in depth.

1. Describe the two works by providing the following information for each.

a. Who is the artist?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

b. What is the title of the work?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

c. When was the work created?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

d. What medium was used (e.g., clay, bronze, marble)?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

e. How large is the work? Provide dimensions.

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

f. Is the work representational? Naturalistic? Abstract? Stylized? Nonrepresentational? Give details that demonstrate your answer.

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

g. Does the work depict a person? If so, what is the person doing?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

2. Compare and contrast the two works of art by analyzing each artist’s use of the principles of sculpture.
 

a. Which of the four basic methods for making sculpture is utilized here?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

b. How would the feeling of the work differ if it were created using one of the other three methods?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

c. Identify what is emphasized in each work. How is it emphasized? What, if anything, becomes subordinated?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

d. Describe the scale and proportion employed in each work.

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

e. What would be lost and what would be gained if this were a two-dimensional work?

Work 1:  

Work 2:  

3. Look at Torso at the Museum Kampa in Prague. This sculpture is vastly different and shows the evolution of sculpture over time.

a. What conclusions can you draw about the evolution of the medium in art?

b. How do you think each style is representative of its respective time period?

c. What hasn’t changed?

 

4. Recall your initial reasons for selecting the two works.

a. What were your first impressions?

b. Do you think their curation affected your impressions? If so, why?

c. How have your impressions changed after you looked at the two works closely?

Link of State Hermitage Museum, in St. Petersburg,- https://artsandculture.google.com/partner/the-state-hermitage-museum 

Criminal justice system assignment help

  

Criminal justice system assignment help

criminology

Description

THE THREE QUESTIONS SHOULD BE 400-500 WORD 

1. Nubbles and Rudge decide to rob the Tight Fist Bank. They make elaborate plans and purchase

some firearms to assist them in their venture. On the appointed day, they drive to a street corner just

one block away from the bank; they intend to observe the bank for a while and then undertake the

robbery at the most appropriate moment.  However, a police cruiser passes by and the two officers

notice that Nubble and Rudge look suspicious.  The officers arrest the would-be bandits when they

find two sawed-off shotguns and two masks on the back seat of the car.  Nubbles and Rudge are

subsequently charged with attempted robbery.  Are they guilty of this offense?

Discuss the potential criminal liability, if any, of each person mentioned.   Identify, define, and

describe relevant concepts and issues.

State any assumptions you may need to make to analyze the issues. In your response, consider

course materials, case law, legislation, any contributions to the optional discussion forums, and any

other resources you consider relevant.

2. Cruncher and Slammer are professional hockey players who are playing on opposing teams. As

Cruncher is carrying the puck, Slammer pushes him into the boards along the side of the hockey https://homeworkharbour.info/hello-i-need-to-write-a-discussion-post-about-a-book-called-educated-in-whiten

rink. An altercation develops between them, and some punches are thrown.  The referee whistles

play dead, and after a brief period, the linesmen separate Cruncher and Slammer and lead them

toward their respective penalty boxes.  However, Cruncher breaks free from his accompanying

linesman and skates up to Slammer and punches him in the eye – to the delight of the local fans.

Cruncher is 6 feet 5 inches tall and weighs 280 pounds. Slammer is 5 feet 8 inches tall and weighs

150 pounds. The blow inflicted by Cruncher opens a deep cut underneath Slammer’s eye and

numerous stitches are required to close the wound. Cruncher is charged with assault causing bodily

harm.  Does cruncher have any defense (s)?

In addition to the question posed above, please discuss the Instructor’s addition to the fact pattern

as follows:

Mandy was sitting in the audience at the hockey rink. She was so distressed and upset by seeing

Slammer injured, with all the blood on the ice, that she became dazed and disoriented. She grabbed https://homeworkbay.info/2021/06/12/how-does-your-own-company-build-the-dna-code-using-this-figure-7-1-for-innovati/

her umbrella and repeatedly hit a nearby woman on the head with it, injuring her. Several hockey

fans had to intervene to stop Mandy from hitting the woman, and they would later tell the police that

Mandy had a blank look and did not seem to be normal.

Discuss the potential criminal liability, if any, of each person mentioned.  Identify, define, and

describe relevant concepts and issues.

State any assumptions you may need to make to analyze the issues. In your response, consider

course materials, case law, legislation, any contributions to the optional discussion forums, and any

other resources you consider relevant.

3. A federal politician, Ronald Thump, has recently announced that the Canadian government will

amend the criminal law to reduce the number of defenses available to accused persons. In

particular, the government intends to completely eliminate the defense of necessity or duress.

“With one of these defenses eliminated, there will be cost savings in the criminal justice system. 

Canada has far too many defenses available to accused persons, resulting in court delays and

increased costs,” Mr. Thump stated. “One of these defenses has got to go.  The public is confused

about these two defenses, and too many criminals are getting off on these technicalities.”

Mr. Thump has asked you, his Special Advisor, to prepare an opinion for him on which defense to

eliminate:  necessity or duress. He wants a clear Recommendation from you, with reasons for your

choice.

In your opinion, you must describe both defenses in detail and provide examples.