Elements of Critical Thinking [WLOs: 2, 3, 4] [CLOs: 2, 3, 4]       

Prepare: In preparation for discussing the importance of critical thinking skills, please read the following articles: Critical Thinking and the Challenges of Internet (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and Common Misconceptions of Critical Thinking. You may also read other applicable sources found under the Week 4 Resources tab to gain a better understanding of what it takes to be a critical thinker.

Reflect: Reflect on the characteristics of a  critical thinker. Critical thinking gets you involved in a dialogue with  the ideas you read from others in this class. To be a critical thinker,  you need to be able to summarize, analyze, hypothesize, and evaluate  new information that you encounter.

Write: For this discussion, you will address the  following prompts. Keep in mind that the article or video you’ve chosen  should not be about critical thinking, but should be about  someone making a statement, claim, or argument related to your Final  Paper topic. One source should demonstrate good critical thinking skills  and the other source should demonstrate the lack or absence of critical  thinking skills. Personal examples should not be used.

• Explain at least five elements of critical thinking that you found in the reading material.
• Search the Internet, media, or the Ashford University Library, and  find an example in which good critical thinking skills are being  demonstrated by the author or speaker. Summarize the content, and  explain why you think it demonstrates good critical thinking skills.
• Search the Internet, media, or the Ashford University Library, and  find an example in which the author or speaker lacks good critical  thinking skills. Summarize the content, and explain why you think it  demonstrates the absence of good, critical thinking skills.

You are required to  provide in-text citations of applicable required reading materials  and/or any other outside sources you use to support your claims. Provide  full reference entries of all sources cited at the end of your  response.

 Typically, when speaking of validity, qualitative researchers are referring to research that is credible and trustworthy, i.e., the extent to which one can have confidence in the study’s findings (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). Generalizability, a marker of reliability, is typically not a main purpose of qualitative research because the researcher rarely selects a random sample with a goal to generalize to a population or to other settings and groups. Rather, a qualitative researcher’s goal is often to understand a unique event or a purposively selected group of individuals. Therefore, when speaking of reliability, qualitative researchers are typically referring to research that is consistent or dependable (Lincoln & Guba, 1985), i.e., the extent to which the findings of the study are consistent with the data that was collected. 

References

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

For this Discussion, you will explain criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research and consider the connection of such criteria to philosophical orientations. You will also consider the ethical implications of designing qualitative research.

Post an explanation of two criteria for evaluating the quality of qualitative research designs. Next, explain how these criteria are tied to epistemological and ontological assumptions underlying philosophical orientations and the standards of your discipline. Then, identify a potential ethical issue in qualitative research and explain how it might influence design decisions. Finally, explain what it means for a research topic to be amenable to scientific study using a qualitative approach.

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Develop a disaster recovery plan for an organization. There are many different templates available online for you to use as reference and guidance. Your plan should cover the following sections (these sections detail the elements in a DR plan in the sequence defined by industry compliance standards ISO 27031 and ISO 24762):

1. Important: This section should summarize key action steps (such as where to assemble employees if forced to evacuate the building) and list key contacts with contact information for ease of authorizing and launching the plan.
2. Introduction
3. Roles and Responsibilities
4. Incident Response
5. Plan Activation
6. Document History
7. Procedures

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

• Be approximately four to five pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page. (Remember, APA is double spaced)
• Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
• Support your answers with the https://paperwriters.xyz/uncategorized/develop-a-disaster-recovery-plan-for-an-organization/ readings from the course and at least four scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find resources.
• Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

Project

For each week’s Project, you will answer statistical questions and solve statistical problems using the STATDISK software. Remember that the primary focus of these exercises is to understand how to properly solve statistical computations using the STATDISK software. It is also important to focus on the approach you took to arrive at a solution. Grading weight will be placed not only on correctness, but also on the depth and clarity of your answers. In the Week 1 Project you will learn how to open a file, copy, paste, and sort data, input and transform data. Assume all data files that you work with are samples unless otherwise stated.

Note: You will NOT receive full credit for a problem submitted without an explanation. See the Course Information area for the grading evaluation criteria for Projects.

1. Read pages 3-7 in the Statdisk User Manual.
2. Perform Statdisk computations and answer questions in the Week 1 Project document

How to Format your Assignment

You will be using the original Week 1 Project as it appears in Attachments as a template for your answers.

1. Open the Week 1 Project found in Attachments below. The Project will open in Microsoft Word and allow for you to cut, paste, and insert text.
2. Insert your solution to each problem directly below the question. Color your answers red.
3. Be sure to cut and paste ALL tables, charts, and information generated by using the STATDISK statistical program and explain what each chart represents.

Before you submit your finished Project, make sure that each question includes the original problem, your solution to the problem, and your explanation of how you arrived at such a solution in red.

ProjecFor each week’s Project, you will answer statistical questions and solve statistical problems using the STATDISK software. Remember that the primary focus of these exercises is to understand how to properly solve statistical computations using the STATDISK software. It is also important to focus on the approach you took to arrive at a solution. Grading weight will be placed not only on correctness, but also on the depth and clarity of your answers. In the Week 1 Project you will learn how to open a file, copy, paste, and sort data, input and transform data. Assume all data files that you work with are samples unless otherwise stated.

Note: You will NOT receive full credit for a problem submitted without an explanation. See the Course Information area for the grading evaluation criteria for Projects.tt

***Project will be checked for authenticity 

Require some personal interpretation or perspective, often because of a stake in the topic

criminology

Description

Each student will choose a prominent theorist, activist, or reformer within criminology to research (historical or contemporary and from any society) and write a short paper (i.e., a minimum of 4 double-spaced pages) exploring and outlining the importance of their work. https://homeworkmasterss.com/participate-in-a-discussion-regarding-the-article-making-process-improvements-s/

Approach this assignment like a profile. Some definitions of a profile are quite narrow (e.g., a story of one person that explores their background and character). However, I invite you to consider the process of researching and writing a profile more dynamically. Yes, a profile should examine the subject’s personal and professional life, as well as give the reader a greater understanding of the subject through the lens of their personal interests, career, education, background, advocacy, and contributions to criminology. However, it is important to consider going beyond the obvious two-dimensional portrait of a person. For example, you could research a specific person (e.g., theories, activist, reformer) or profile of a reform movement; however, if you write a profile on an entire movement, you will probably find it still comes back to the people involved with the place/idea/campaign/movement, https://prohomeworkhelpers.com/2021/06/08/1-provide-an-analysis-of-the-weeks-required-lectures-2-do-some-outside-researc/ but you are still researching and writing about the movement/campaign/idea/event.

Profiles : 

• Require some personal interpretation or perspective, often because of a stake in the topic. 

• Typically provoke more thinking about ideas even beyond the “individual” at the centre of the profile. 

• Develop the breadth, depth, dimensionality, and contradictions inherent in the topic. 

• Might emphasize the exotic, peculiar or bizarre, but they always get beyond the surface — sometimes with emphasis on social, political, https://www.instaassignment.com/picot-question-in-the-pediatric-population-from-ages-0-18-will-parent-educati/ or moral implications implicit in the topic.