Please read carefully. These are 3 assignments that are related. I need this by Saturday. Please pay great attention to details.

  

Assignment 1

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two qualitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part 1” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Assignment 2

Write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of two quantitative research studies. Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples, and reference content from the study in your responses.

Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1,000–1,250 word essay, summarize two quantitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Assignment 3

Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Question 

Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.

The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

music assignment 6

For this reflection essay, choose any one of the following ideas and write your one-page essay about it:

  • Describe the relationship between sound and silence in Japanese gagaku. How does the interplay of silence and sound affect the timbral (textural) and impact of the music? Are the sounds of the instruments surprising to you based on what they look like? If so, describe what you expected based on appearance and what sound quality you hear instead.
  • Consider the sound vs. silence question in relation to the instruments of the sankyoku ensemble (shakuhachi, the shamisen, and/or the koto).  What is it that gives each instrument its unique timbre? (think instrument materials, things used to play the instrument, etc.) 
  • What are the requirements for becoming a gagaku musician in the Imperial Household Agency?  (Is there a family connection? How long must one study? What does an aspiring gagaku musician need to know?
  • Describe one membranophone, one aerophone, and one chordophone used in gagaku, including how each is played, and the instrument’s subtype (according to the Hornbostel-Sachs system).
  • Describe how ethnomusicologist William Malm’s observation (extracting maximum effect from a minimum of musical materials) applies to a gagaku performance, or to any solo performance style of one of the three sankyoku instruments.
  • We discussed three different musical (or at least sound-making) groups or roles that are part of kabuki theater performances.  Name all three, including the instruments or sounds they use, and where they are physically located in relation to the main action and actors on stage.  What are some other important elements of kabuki staging? (These may or may not have to do with music.)
  • Describe the relationship between the shakuhachi, breath, and meditation, and the instrument’s movement from that purpose to music.  
  • Discuss the role of the komuso and what it had to do with the shakuhachi, meditation, and the internecine struggles between the warring states of Japan in the Tokugawa (or Edo) period.
  • What are the instruments used in sankyoku? Describe distinctive features of each — structure, material, etc., and how each is classified in the Hornbostel-Sachs system. And what is their role of these instruments in relation to the main melody?
  • How does an Okinawan sanshin differ from a Japanese shamisen, in terms of both instrument structure (and materials) and playing technique, and use within different traditions, in different ensembles (or alone), and for different occasions?
  • What group of instruments is typical in Okinawan minyo music? What about the role of the voice?
  • How is Okinawa (and really the Ryukyu Island chain) both part of Japan, and yet separate in history and identity? 

English outline,Discussion

Write an outline for Paper 4.  To do so, you should organize the information that will be in your essay.  The purposes of an outline are many, and it is a vital skill to be able to make an effective structure for your thoughts.  Outlines should save you time and effort, while also making your work far more effective.  That said, few students use them at all, or use them effectively.  That is why we are going to practice them here.

An effective outline should have a few basic elements.  To demonstrate these, I will do so in outline form.  You can watch this video for some helpful tips too.

  1. Aspects of an effective outline
    1. Hierarchy of ideas (structure)
      1. Defines the function of each idea
        1. Topic sentence: defines a paragraph
        2. Major detail: supports the topic sentence and is usually a concept of some kind
        3. Minor detail: supports a major detail and is often a specific, concrete example, quote, statistic, or explanation
    2. Content: evaluating your ideas
      1. Order: there should be a logical way to connect the ideas
        1. Chronological: develops along a time line
        2. Spatial: develops in a physical space
          1. Example: from US regions—West, Mountains, Plains, Midwest, East Coast, South
        3. Importance
          1. From most to least important
          2. From least to most important
      2. Quantity: there should be enough evidence to clearly make your point
        1. Are there any concepts that need additional explanation or evidence to support?
        2. Are there any terms that the reader might not know that need definition?
      3. Quality: the points should be specific and easily understood
    3. Organization
      1. Unity
        1. Every point that is made pertains to the thesis
      2. Coherence
        1. All the points transition well
          1. Transitions are relationships, so there needs to be an obvious relationship between ideas

You should view the Outline Rubric before you begin this assignment.  You are also required to write two peer responses, which is a space that should be used to review each other’s work and make suggestions for improvement.

Please remember that the rubric is a qualitative evaluation of the discussion forum. Students will be expected to complete an original post and two responses.  

To complete this assignment:

  • Write your outline

Please choose a prompt from the following sources.  Take careful note of what the prompt is asking, and be sure that your paper directly addresses the question at hand.

For “Fish Cheeks” answer the following:

In this article, what does Amy Tan identify as “being American”?  Do you agree with her?

Discussion 7- Exe Proj

Assigned Readings:

Chapter 7. Risk Management 

Initial Postings: Read and reflect on the assigned readings for the week. Then post what you thought was the most important concept(s), method(s), term(s), and/or any other thing that you felt was worthy of your understanding in each assigned textbook chapter.Your initial post should be based upon the assigned reading for the week, so the textbook should be a source listed in your reference section and cited within the body of the text. Other sources are not required but feel free to use them if they aid in your discussion.

Also, provide a graduate-level response to each of the following questions:

  1. Give some examples of projects using each of the risk mitigation strategies (accept, minimize, share, or transfer).  How successful were these strategies?  In hindsight, would another approach have been better?

[Your post must be substantive and demonstrate insight gained from the course material. Postings must be in the student’s own words – do not provide quotes!] 

 [Your initial post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced). Post the actual body of your paper in the discussion thread then attach a Word-version of the paper for APA review]

Text-

Title: Project Management ISBN: 9780134730332 Authors: Pinto Publisher: Pearson Edition: 5TH 19 

Essay /Project #3

Just talk about how pandemic  affect people’s life (especially student)

For our 3rd big assignment, the general topic areas that we are exploring is: Politics (this can be local or national) /Community engagement / Climate and Environment …. Of course you don’t need to have your idea hit ALL these areas…. one area is enough.  What you are doing for this Essay/Project #3 is creating a project proposal.  You should think of this as a document that you are creating that LOOKS like a proposal. 

Here are the questions for you to address. You will want to do Rule of 3 for as many of these questions as possible :

  1. Please describe in detail, what exactly is your project proposal about?
  2. What need is being filled, or what problem is being addressed by your project? (What is the issue that you are addressing and why does it matter?)
  3. Who is the audience for your project? (It usually doesn’t work to say “everybody”–that usually means you have not focused deeply enough on your project details.)
  4. How will people interact with your project?
  5. What makes your project innovative?
  6. What materials will you need to  create your project? Be specific about types of materials and quantity of each.
  7. What existing assets in the community can you  leverage to complete your project? Describe in detail how you will use the asset to execute your project. (This can be people you know, or community members, or organizations, or  other resources.)

Please provide data, case studies, past experiments/experiences, success stories from other situations, etc. to support why you believe your project will be successful.  This is the research part of this assignment. 

You will want to include:
Cover page, with title of your project, pics, your name, make it look pro, make it colorful

Table of contents— with the names of your sections

Throughout the writing you will want to make it look professional, and add pics, charts, graphs, etc, where needed. You should think about using graphic software like Canva to make the final product look great.

asap in 1 hour

 

ANALYZINGMETHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO APPLY IN 

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Overview

Important:Use the feedback youhave received throughout this course to revise 

the content you write for this assignment.

In this fourth and final assignment, you will write a paper that compares two 

different methodological approaches that could be applied for the same research 

topic. 

The essential aspectsof qualitative research you will write about in this paper are

usually included in qualitative research proposals. This final paper will 

expandupon and strengthen the essential aspects of qualitative research that 

you wrote about in thefirst three assignments. You will revise and refine the 

content from those papers based upon feedback you have receivedand what 

you have learned during this course, and use your revised content as the 

foundation for this assignment.For this final course paper, you will complete the 

following for each of yourtwo selected methodological approaches:

 State the research question.

 State a rationale that is supported with research theory.

 Develop a plan for gathering data related to the research topic.

 Explain how the data would be analyzed.

 Address ethical issues that may be present with the data 

collection and analysis.

 Support your ideas for the data collection plans and data analysis

strategies with the appropriate academic sources.

  

  • Present the research topic      you identified in the Week 4 assignment.
  • Identify the first selected      methodological approach you identified in the Week 8 assignment, as well      as the research question that aligns with that approach.
    • Present a 2–3-paragraph       rationale that describes the purpose of the research.
    • Describe in 2– 3 paragraphs how data would be collected and analyzed using this       approach.
    • Include potential ethical issues       as well.
  • Identify the second      methodological approach you identified in the Week 8 assignment, as well      as the research question that aligns with that approach.
    • Present a 2–3 paragraph       rationale that describes the purpose of the research.
    • Describe in 2– 3 paragraphs how data would be collected and analyzed using this       approach.
    • Include potential ethical       issues as well.
  • Support your assignment      with appropriate academic sources and include both citations and      references in current APA format. Use 5–7 scholarly resources      published with the past three years by recognized academic sources.

Requirements

Your assignment should also meet the following requirements:

  • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that      detract from the overall message.
  • Length of paper: Meets the structure provided in the      assignment instructions.
  • Resources: 5–7 scholarly resources. Include a reference page at the end      of the paper.

APA guidelines: Double-spaced paragraph formatting in the body of the paper. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings. Resources and citations are formatted according to current  

Develop a Matlab GUI that allows the users to label a connected component in the binary image by clicking on one of its pixels.

Submission Guidelines

Prepare a folder with your Matlab (m) and GUI (fig) files into zip folder

Description of Assignment

Develop a Matlab GUI that allows the users to label a connected component in the binary

image by clicking on one of its pixels.

Following are specific requirements:

– Your GUI must provide a button that allows the user to browse and select a binary image, and then show the selected binary image on axes.

– When the user clicks on a foreground pixel on GUI, you must use the position of mouse click as the starting point to implement the algorithm discussed in class to extract connected components.

– When the user clicks on a background pixel on GUI, there should be no change.

– You can use function ginput to read x and y coordinates of mouse click.

– You can use function imdilate to implement the morphological dilation operation.

– You must show the connected component output of the selected foreground object on a separate image next to the original image.

NOTE: 

Read the connected component morphological algorithm in the word file attached (Dilation-Connected component algorithm.docx)

Assignment should be done using “morphological algorithm” and on the images(Input Set) provided

Trends in healthcare policy week 2 project

In a Microsoft Word document of 2-3 pages formatted in APA style, you will answer three questions related to your opportunity as a nurse and an advocate. The first two questions relate to influencing a bill that is traveling through the legislative process. The third question refers you to the social determinants of health and asks you to think specifically on your role as a nurse in influencing social determinants of health.

Answer the following questions:

  • What parts of the lawmaking process does a nurse have an opportunity to influence the final bill passage?
  • List at least two ways that this influence can take place. In your opinion, would one way be preferable over the other?
  • Reviewing the social determinants of health, select one to respond to this question:
    • What role can nurses play in promoting health status through policy changes directly affecting this social determinant?

Write each question as a new topic area and then follow with a paragraph or two to answer the question. You may find it necessary to search for answers to the questions outside of the assigned reading.

On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA format. Helpful APA guides and resources are available in the South University Online Library. Below are guides that are located in the library and can be accessed and downloaded via the South University Online Citation Resources: APA Style page. The American Psychological Association website also provides detailed guidance on formatting, citations, and references at APA Style

Eating disorders of men and how they are under diagnosed and misdiagnosed.

 1. Is there an abstract with a list of keywords preceding the research paper?  

  • Cover page?
  • Page numbers?
  • Indented paragraphs?
  • 1” margins?
  • A total of 5 pages, not including the cover page, abstract and references page?

 2. Introduction: Is the thesis clear?  What is it?  

 Does it appear soon enough in the paper?

  • What questions does the thesis promise to answer? There are usually three, sometimes two, sometimes four or more.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  1. Introduction: Is there some background given in the introduction that gives you some idea of why this topic is important or timely or relevant?  What is it?
  2. Introduction: Is there an engaging first sentence?  
    • Is it an interesting fact, 
    • alarming statistic, 
    • question, 
    • quote, 
    • story
  3. Introduction: Is there any terminology you need defined sooner to better understand the discussion that follows?
  4. Body: In which paragraphs has each of the thesis questions been answered?
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  1. Body: Evidence: Has evidence been given to back up the claims made the research paper?  Since the research paper is required to have four sources, you should find at least four different sources cited in APA style as in-text citations (also called parenthetical citations).

 i.   

 ii.   

 iii.   

 iv.   

Body: Evidence: What type of evidence is each of the above – data, studies, expert opinion?          

  1. Body: Evidence: Is there enough evidence given to be convincing?  Could it be improved? 

 i.  How? 

updated statistics, any statistics, an explanation for conflicting statistics

a quote from an expert, 

a more credible source, a primary source, 

a case history or example

  1. Body: Evidence: Are the in-text citations done properly in APA style? 
    • Were you able to easily match up the in-text citation with the first word(s) in the References page?
  2. Body: Evidence: In each paragraph, does the writer explain how each piece of evidence is pertinent to the thesis?   If not, where? 
    • Remember paragraph structure:

 i.   Topic sentence

 ii.  Support sentences

 iii.  Closing sentence to help integrate the information in the support sentences with the topic sentence and with the paper’s thesis.

  1. Body: Evidence: Are there any in-text (parenthetical) citations missing for quotations, expert opinion or data?  Where?  

 i.  Were there any citations given for paraphrasing? Where?

                           ii.   Are there any claims made that don’t have evidence for them? That are based solely on the writer’s opinion? 

  1. Body: Evidence: Are the cited sources credible and convincing?  
    • Do any of the quotations or opinions or data need a signal phrase 

 i.  to explain who the author is and why the author is credible 

 ii.  or where the data comes from?  

  1. Body: Is there a logical progression of ideas? 
    • Did each idea help support the thesis, or is something missing that would help you better understand the writer’s points?
    • Are there transitions missing that would help you understand how an idea, paragraph or sentence is connected to the one before it? Where?
  2. Body: Are there any sentences that are too long and convoluted to be easily understood? Where could they be broken down into more than one sentence?
  3. Are there any personal pronouns (“I, me, mine, you/your”)? Where?
    • If “you/your/yours“ is used, is it being used strategically to directly address the reader? 
    • Is it always clear who” they” are or what “it is? If not, where? 
  4. Conclusion: Is there a conclusion? 
    • What does the conclusion do? What type of conclusion is it? 
      • Does it ask something of the reader? Of some other group or institutions? 
      • Does it make a recommendation or give advice? 
      • Does it inform the reader of proposed or possible solutions to a problem? 
      • Is it a call to action? Tor awareness, education? 
      • Does it speculate about the future? 
      • Or does it make an observation based on what has been learned in the course of reading the research paper?  
  5. Conclusion: Are you left with any questions about the subject/argument?
  6. No more than 20% of the paper is quotes (80/20 rule).
  7. References: Is there a References page in proper APA style?
    • Is the heading bold and centered?
    • Is the list alphabetized?
    • Are hanging indents used?
    • Are there at least four sources?
    • Are about half of them primary? 
    • Are the names of the publications included in primary source citations?
    • Is each electronically accessed source followed by a doi: or URL?

you may work off the essay provided. add to it. this needs to be done within 4 hours!

2 pages report on paper [Doyle91] B. Doyle, B. Fishbein, and K. Mistry, “NBTI-enhanced hot carrier damage in p-channel MOSFETs,” Proc. Intl. Electron Devices Meeting, 1991, pp. 529-532A.

  

your selected paper title and the next line should be the authors of the paper you are reviewing, and finally the next line should contain where and when it was published.

Your abstract (between 35 and 60 words, not the abstract of the paper, but an abstract of your report).

An introduction section, which describes the general overview or background for the paper, which is not to exceed one paragraph. 

The largest section describes the key technical contents of the paper. This is just a paragraph or two for both the MS students and undergraduates. Remember, the whole report is limited to one page. MS students should include an additional PowerPoint presentation that is a title slide, 2 or 3 slides with bulleted topics(not full sentences, short one line notes) from your report and a couple of key figures from the paper and a description of those figures. Be sure to provide any key significantly relevant equations. Not all of the equations in the paper are key to the main topic of the paper. 

The evaluation section should identify any potentially interesting references within the paper, if there are any. The evaluation section must answer these questions: Is the paper clearly written? Was the paper interesting? Was the work original? Are all of the key concepts clearly present? Is it technically sound? Is the math correct? Are the claims supported by evidence? Are the tables and figures clear and relevant to the paper? Are the limitations of the method presented? Are there sufficient references to prior work? Is the idea in this paper compared or contrasted with other work? Is the English satisfactory? What would you change? Is it too long or too short?

 Your report should include a summary section.