Qualitative Research Project

Research Activity- Qualitative Research

Decide which of tools below are best suited for your study.

  • Interviews
  • Focus Groups
  • Survey
  • Observations
  • Case Study

Evaluate your chosen tool(s) and explain clearly your rationale for choosing that particular tool(s).

E.g. if you choose to do interviews, who will you interview, how (face-to-face, video, telephone), how long will the interview be, will you record it and if so, what happens with the recording? You also have to think carefully about the research question and what data you want to get and then design the research protocol. That means thinking about the questions themselves and writing them out.

Additional Requirements:

  • 12-point Times New Roman; double spaced; and page numbering.
  • Please be sure to complete the entire assignmetn to receive maximum credit for this assignment.
  • Use and include information from the weekly course content and outside sources to support the conclusions contained in your submission.
  • Be cognizant of spelling, punctuation, and grammar.
  • All sources should be cited in proper APA format (in-text citations and a reference list).
  • Submit your work in Word format, NOT as a pdf file.
  • Your attachment should be labeled with your name, the name of this class, and the assignment e.g. Jones – EBM502 – Lesson 3.

Personality

Please describe each of the “Big 5” personality traits. For each trait, provide an example of how it might contribute positively to an individual’s performance.

Develop a response that includes examples and evidence to support your ideas, and which clearly communicates the required message to your audience. Organize your response in a clear and logical manner as appropriate for the genre of writing. Use well-structured sentences, audience-appropriate language, and correct conventions of standard American English.

Agreeableness refers to a person’s ability to get along with others. Agreeableness causes some people to be gentle, cooperative, forgiving, understanding, and good-natured in their dealings with others. But it results in others’ being irritable, short-tempered, uncooperative, and generally antagonistic toward other people. Although research has not yet fully investigated the effects of agreeableness, it would seem likely that highly agreeable people will be better able to develop good working relationships with coworkers, subordinates, and higher-level managers, whereas less agreeable people will not have particularly good working relationships. This same pattern might also extend to relationships with customers, suppliers, and other key organizational constituents.

Conscientiousness refers to the number of things a person can effectively work on at one time. People who focus on relatively fewer tasks and projects are likely to be organized, systematic, careful, thorough, responsible, and self-disciplined as they work to complete those tasks and projects. Others, however, tend to take on too many tasks and projects and/or to procrastinate and, as a result, are more disorganized, careless, and irresponsible, as well as less thorough and self-disciplined. Research has found that more conscientious people tend to be higher performers than less conscientious people across a variety of different jobs. This pattern seems logical, of course, because more conscientious people will take their jobs seriously and will approach the performance of their jobs in highly responsible fashions.

The third of the Big Five personality dimensions is negative emotionality. People with less negative emotionality will be relatively poised, calm, resilient, and secure. But people with more negative emotionality will be more excitable, insecure, reactive, and subject to extreme mood swings. People with less negative emotionality might be expected to better handle job stress, pressure, and tension. Their stability might also lead them to be seen as more reliable than their less stable counterparts.

Extraversion refers to a person’s comfort level with relationships. People who are called “extraverts” are sociable, talkative, assertive, and open to establishing new relationships. Introverts are much less sociable, talkative, and assertive, and less open to establishing new relationships. Research suggests that extraverts tend to be higher overall job performers than introverts and that they are also more likely to be attracted to jobs based on personal relationships, such as sales and marketing positions.

Finally, openness refers to a person’s rigidity of beliefs and range of interests. People with high levels of openness are willing to listen to new ideas and to change their own ideas, beliefs, and attitudes as a result of new information. They also tend to have broad interests and to be curious, imaginative, and creative. On the other hand, people with low levels of openness tend to be less receptive to new ideas and less willing to change their minds. Further, they tend to have fewer and narrower interests and to be less curious and creative. People with more openness might be expected to be better performers, owing to their flexibility and the likelihood that they will be better accepted by others in the organization. Openness may also encompass an individual’s willingness to accept change. For example, people with high levels of openness may be more receptive to change, whereas people with low levels of openness may be more likely to resist change.

organizational/ industrial assignment

 

total 20 page this

All four projects for this course will be completed from the vantage

point of a specific industry and an organization assigned to you by me

as your instructor. Here are the organizations/industries I have to

assign:

1. A research extensive public university in the higher education

sector.

2. A private hospital in the healthcare sector.

3. A public K-12 public school district in the education sector.

4. A private retail bank in the finance sector.

5. A local state municipality in the government sector.

6. A federal defense contractor in the public-private sector.

7. A national commercial retail superstore chain in the private

consumer goods sector.

Project 1: Security Models

Start Here

Security Models

[Music]

You have just taken a position as the chief information security officer

at your organization. John Williams, the chief technology officer and

your new boss, stops at your office door.

“I know you’re busy, but I’d like you to come by my office when you get

a chance.”

Excited about the prospect of something new, you grab a pen and

paper and walk to John’s office.

John says, “Thanks for coming over so quickly. I’ll get right to the point.

As the CISO, I’m sure that you’re aware of the recent Office of

Personnel Management breach, and the impact that this has had on

our industry."

John continues, “I’m sure that you also realize the heavy burden on our

department to protect our organization’s assets and information. I

would like to make sure that a similar situation doesn’t happen here.

My first step toward preventive measures is to develop new policies

and procedures that better protect our data.”

John sits at his desk and begins typing while he says, “That brings me

to why I asked you here. While I begin my review of current policies

and procedures, I would like you to help me by drafting a custom

security plan that best fits our organization.”

John continues, “You should start by analyzing our security

weaknesses, or vulnerabilities, then continue with reviewing existing

security models and analyzing which attributes are best suited for our

organization. You will look at the pros and cons of each model, which

attributes are best suited for us, and the reasoning behind your

conclusions. You will need to submit your completed report to me with

a drafted security plan in two weeks.”

As a new employee, you realize that this is a great opportunity to show

your new boss how you can make a positive contribution to your

organization. You know you have enough time to complete your

analysis if you start right away.

[Music]

Most companies and agencies implement security models to protect

the confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information and

data. As security vulnerabilities and threats continue to evolve, security

systems need to adapt to effectively protect data and systems.

This is the first of four sequential projects for this course. In this

project, you will evaluate existing security models and their attributes

and ultimately recommend a custom security plan to your assigned

organization.

You will also evaluate the pros and cons of implementing particular

model attributes based on the type of organization and employees in

relation to CIA.

To complete the project, you will write a report on the importance of

security models in organizations like yours and identify the

vulnerabilities of the organization.

There are 14 steps in this project. Begin by reviewing the project

scenario and then proceed to Step 1.

Competencies

Your work will be evaluated using the competencies listed below.

 5.1: Define and appropriately use basic cybersecurity concepts

and terminology.

 6.2: Create an information security program and strategy, and

maintain alignment of the two.

 7.3: Evaluate enterprise cybersecurity policy.

 9.2: Vulnerability Assessment: Rank the vulnerabilities of a

system from a disaster-management perspective.

Step 1: Review the Assigned Organization

All four projects for this course will be completed from the vantage

point of a specific industry and an organization assigned to you by the

instructor. If you do not know your assigned organization, contact your

instructor immediately. If you want to use another organization than the

one assigned you or one not listed, contact your instructor as well.

Familiarize yourself with the organization and breach your instructor

has assigned by reviewing the details

at https://www.databreaches.net/. The descriptions include an overview

and key information about the organization on the internet, as well as

information about a breach or attempted breach. For the purposes of

this course, you will assume this organization is your employer.

You may wish to briefly research your assigned organization to gather

additional information about the organization and its security posture.

Career Connections

The breach you have been assigned is a matter of historical fact. Your

scholarly research into this matter can and should inform your

approach to cybersecurity management. Your ability to fluently

converse on past cyber breaches is one way of demonstrating to

potential employers that you have the necessary knowledge, skills, and

abilities to be a valuable addition to their team. Take notes as you read

about this breach—feel free to search for other major breaches—and

pay attention to the mistakes that were made that and what actions

were taken afterward. As a part of the interview process, you might be

asked to apply this knowledge to a new situation.

You will use this information throughout the project as you work to

develop a security plan for your organization.

In the next step, you will compile a cybersecurity overview.

Step 2: Write a Cybersecurity Background Summary

In Step 1, you familiarized yourself with your assigned organization.

Now, it is time to write a cybersecurity overview. Write a three-page

background summary that includes a general overview of cybersecurity

and a section on enterprise cybersecurity.

Include the following items in the general overview of cybersecurity:

 Compare and contrast cybersecurity and computer security.

 Discuss data flows across networks. As part of this discussion, it

may help to review the following topics: binary digits,  nontextual

data , ASCII, hexadecimal, computer networks, network devices

and cables, and network protocols.

 Discuss basic cybersecurity concepts and vulnerabilities,

including flaws that can exist in software. As part of this

discussion, it may help to review the following topics: systems,

utilities, and application software, software, interaction of

software, and creating a program.

 Discuss common cybersecurity attacks. Helpful topics

include protocols, web sessions, and security issues, servers and

firewalls, a closer look at the World Wide Web and web markup

language, cyberattacks, and attack vectors.

 Discuss penetration testing.

 Discuss how to employ network forensic analysis tools (NFAT) to

identify software communications vulnerabilities.

Include the following items in the enterprise cybersecurity section:

 List and discuss the major concepts of enterprise cybersecurity,

including confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA)

 Discuss the principles that underlie the development of an

enterprise cybersecurity policy framework and implementation

plan.

 List the major types of cybersecurity threats that a modern

enterprise might face.

You will attach this cybersecurity background summary to the security

assessment in a later project step.

Submit the cybersecurity background summary for feedback.

Step 3: Analyze Security Weaknesses

After writing the cybersecurity background summary, you are ready to

analyze the security weaknesses of your assigned organization. When

analyzing cybersecurity weaknesses, there are several areas to

consider.

Analyze the organization’s security from the following perspectives:

1. a technology perspective

2. a people perspective

3. a policy perspective

You will include this information in the security assessment. In the next

step, you will consider risk factors. 

Step 4: Compile a Risk Summary

Now that you have looked at security weaknesses, it’s time to identify

areas that should be improved or strengthened, including potential

risks associated with maintaining the current security posture. Discuss

how you would employ network analysis tools to identify software

communications vulnerabilities. Make sure to include the following

information:

1. Classify risks according to relevant criteria.

2. Explain system and application security threats and

vulnerabilities.

3. Prioritize risks from internal and external sources.

4. Assess the cybersecurity threats faced by your entity.

You will include this information in the security assessment, which you

will compile in the next step.

Step 5: Submit a Security Weakness Assessment

From the information that you gathered in the previous steps, develop

a two-page summary of your organization’s security weaknesses.

Identify threats, risks, and vulnerabilities to achieve a holistic view of

risk across the entity.

Consider areas that should be improved from a technology

perspective, a people perspective, and a policy perspective. Also note

potential risks associated with maintaining the current security posture.

You will reference this security assessment later when you make your

business case and final recommendation.

Submit the security assessment for feedback.

Step 6: Begin a Security Models Summary

Confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA triad), as well as

authentication and nonrepudiation, are fundamental security concepts

that must be considered when assessing and developing security

options. Cybersecurity models have been developed to address some

or all of these security concepts.

While these models were generally created to address a specific

business case, each of the models has attributes that could be used to

assemble a custom security plan. In order to draft a custom security

plan for your organization, you will need to understand basic security

models. You will identify key features, weaknesses, and targeted

sectors and/or infrastructures.

In this step and the following step, you will develop a short summary

for each of the security models listed. These reports will serve as an

Appendix A to the final memo and will document the security models

and their attributes in advance of the memo that you will deliver with

your recommended approach.

Each summary should include a descriptive and evaluative paragraph

on the following attributes:

Include the origins of the model (who developed it, when was it

developed, and the context under which it was developed), main

characteristics of the model (details on the business, sector, industry

for whom the model was developed), and key features of the model.

Write summaries for the following common models:

 Bell-LaPadula

 Biba’s Strict Integrity Policy

 Clark-Wilson

 Chinese Wall

When you have completed these summaries, continue to the next step,

where you'll write a summary for the next four security models.

Step 7: Continue the Security Models Summary

Continue summarizing the various cybersecurity models, as in the

previous step. Again, identify key features, weaknesses, and targeted

sectors/infrastructures and develop a short summary for each of the

security models listed below. These reports will be added to Appendix

A for the final memo and will document the security models and their

attributes in advance of the memo that you will deliver with your

recommended approach.

Each summary should include a descriptive and evaluative paragraph

on the following attributes:

Include the origins of the model (who developed it, when was it

developed, and the context under which it was developed), main

characteristics of the model (details on the business, sector, industry

for whom the model was developed), and key features of the model.

Write summaries for the following models:

 Clinical Information Systems Security

 Noninterference Security

 Deducibility Security

 Graham-Denning

When you have finished both steps and the Security Models Summary,

submit Appendix A for feedback.

Step 8: Analyze the Security Models

Now that you are familiar with existing common security models,

analyze each of the security models that you reviewed in the last two

steps and their attributes against the needs of your organization as

identified in the earlier steps. The information that you gather here will

contribute to your security plan.

In the next step, you will look at features that will work for the

organization.

Step 9: Identify Relevant Model Features

Next, identify features from the models that apply to your assigned

organization’s security needs. Also include any security attributes that

you believe are important for your organization but are not included in

any of the models. The information that you gather here, along with the

information gathered in the previous step, will contribute to the security

plan.

When you are finished, in the next step you will put together a security

plan for the organization.

Step 10: Design a Custom Security Plan

Having completed an assessment of your organization’s security

posture and the analysis of security models, you will now design a

custom security plan for the organization. The custom security plan

should meet the following criteria:

 The security plan should coincide with the organization's IT

vision, mission, and goals.

 Include an information security program that aligns with business

strategy.

 Incorporate all internal and external business functions within the

organization's security programs.

 Classify risks according to relevant criteria.

 Prioritize threats from both internal and external sources.

 Rank the most relevant security attributes for the organization

and list them in priority order. This list will serve as Appendix B to

your final assignment.

Submit Appendix B for feedback.

Step 11: Develop a Business Case for Your Organization

With the new security plan written, you will need to develop a business

case for it to include in the memo to the CTO. Using your knowledge of

the organization’s security posture from Step 1 and your understanding

of applicable security model features, make the case for changes to

the organization. Include the rationale for change and any impacts to

the business.

Also include an implementation plan. Describe the present situation in

the organization and the associated risks assumed given the security

weaknesses.

The work you do in this step will become the first of three sections of

the three-page memo in the last step of the project.

In the next step, you will work on another section of the memo, security

models.

Step 12: Identify Security Model Attributes

Next, detail the security model attributes that best apply to the

organization. Identify the model, if any, from which the attributes are

derived and why the attribute applies to the organization.

The work you do in this step will become the second section of the

memo in Step 14.

Assess Security Improvement Potential

Finally, give your best judgment on the potential to improve the security

posture of the organization when your recommendations are

implemented. You will need to evaluate the pros and cons of

implementation in relation to CIA. Discuss the risks and impacts to

include a high-level assessment of financials. Consider how business

continuity and continued alignment will be maintained.

The work you do in this step will become the third section of the memo

in the final step.

Step 14: Develop and Submit a Security Plan

Recommendation Memorandum

Compile the analyses completed in the last three steps into a

memorandum from you to your supervisor. This memo should be three

pages, excluding Appendices A and B, and should clearly articulate the

business case for adopting features from the reviewed security models.

It should include the following:

 a description of the security model attributes

 an assessment of the weaknesses in the organization that the

security features will address

 your rationale for selecting the specific security attributes and

your prognosis of success, noting risks and impacts to include a

high-level assessment of financials

 the policies and procedures that will need to be in place for the

security plan to work

 the infrastructure that will need to be in place for the security

program to operate and to align with each entity within the

organization

 a plan for evaluating the security plan's effectiveness

Update the appendices according to the feedback received. Submit the

memorandum along with Appendices A and B.

Check Your Evaluation Criteria

Before you submit your assignment, review the competencies below,

which your instructor will use to evaluate your work. A good practice

would be to use each competency as a self-check to confirm you have

incorporated all of them. To view the complete grading rubric, click My

Tools, select Assignments from the drop-down menu, and then click

the project title.

 5.1: Define and appropriately use basic cybersecurity concepts

and terminology.

 6.2: Create an information security program and strategy, and

maintain alignment of the two.

 7.3: Evaluate enterprise cybersecurity policy.

 9.2: Vulnerability Assessment: Rank the vulnerabilities of a

system from a disaster-management perspective.

Discussion: Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?

  

March 21, 2010, was not EBP’s date of birth, but it may be the date the approach “grew up” and left home to take on the world.

When the Affordable Care Act was passed, it came with a requirement of empirical evidence. Research on EBP increased significantly. Application of EBP spread to allied health professions, education, healthcare technology, and more. Health organizations began to adopt and promote EBP.

In this Discussion, you will consider this adoption. You will examine healthcare organization websites and analyze to what extent these organizations use EBP.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and reflect on the definition and goal of EBP.
  • Choose a professional healthcare organization’s website (e.g., a reimbursing body, an accredited      body, or a national initiative).
  • Explore the website to determine where and to what extent EBP is evident.

Post a description of the healthcare organization website you reviewed. Describe where, if at all, EBP appears (e.g., the mission, vision, philosophy, and/or goals of the healthcare organization, or in other locations on the website). Then, explain whether this healthcare organization’s work is grounded in EBP and why or why not. Finally, explain whether the information you discovered on the healthcare organization’s website has changed your perception of the healthcare organization. Be specific and provide examples.

Comparison of two sturdy response.

Whether researchers choose to conduct a quantitative or qualitative study, they often articulate objectives, questions and hypotheses in order to clarify the research direction. Objectives are used in order to indicate the specific focus of a study, questions are often more granular and explore relationships between a study’s variable or concepts, and hypotheses make a prediction about the stated relationships (Gray & Grove, 2021).

To compare how these concepts are used, we can look at both a quantitative and a qualitative study. Westling et al.’s study (2019), stated two objectives: “the primary objective was to evaluate the effects of a standardized version of BA [brief admission] by self-referral on inpatient and compulsory care among individuals who self-harm and are at risk of suicide. The secondary objective was to examine whether BA by self-referral increases individuals’ daily functioning and reduces their frequency of self-harm.” (Westling et al., 2019, para 4). The first objective indicates that it is mostly exploratory and more open-ended; it is simply evaluating effects. The second is more focused and states specifically the variables being studied. In an experimental study, such as this one, the objective tells the reader, in concrete terms, what is being studied and can ensure focus on a specific aspect of a broader and more amorphous concept.

Using a qualitative structure, Edmonson, Brennan, and House (2018, para 6) stated their objective as, “to explore the acceptability of using an approach (photo-elicitation) that does not rely on solely verbal or written techniques, and to make a preliminary assessment of whether people can usefully employ images to support a discussion about the reasons why they self-harm.” Qualitative research is usually more abstract and inquisitory. This study’s objective reflects that, in that it does not specify a relationship between variables that can be manipulated. It focuses more on the lived experience of the study participants and their views on a phenomenon.

According to Gray and Grove, the questions used in quantitative studies can indicate the type of study conducted (2021). Westling and colleagues (2019) indicate they are using an experimental design when asking, “Is self-referred brief admission more effective than treatment as usual in reducing the use of inpatient services for individuals who self-harm and are at risk of suicide?” The researchers plainly indicate they intend to use an intervention group and control group in order to study the effectiveness of the intervention.

“Most qualitative nursing studies are guided by the research purpose; very few include stated research questions” (Gray & Grove, 2021, p. 134). This is illustrated quite well in the self-harm study mentioned. The authors indicate several reasons why traditional interviewing is inadequate to understand the reasons behind self-harm. They also hint that a lack of understanding of root causes may be why self-harm recurs with such a high degree of frequency for patients. They then suggest another method to get at understanding and the following question is implied – Can photo elicitation help providers understand reasons for self-harm (Edmonson et al., 2018)?

Lastly, hypotheses are often explicitly stated in quantitative studies, and they indicate an expected relationship between variables. Westling and colleagues (2019, para. 4) indicate their hypothesis within one of the aims of the research. They aim to determine if “self-referral increases individuals’ daily functioning and reduces their frequency of self-harm.” Self referral, daily functioning and frequency of self-harm are variables and there are two causal, directional relationships being studied. Qualitative studies may not have a stated hypothesis, given the nature of the research. There was no prediction made regarding photo elicitation, for example, as the researchers simply wanted to explore its use in interviewing people who self-harm (Edmonson et al., 2019).

References

Edmondson, A. J., Brennan, C., & House, A. O. (2018). Using photo-elicitation to understand reasons for repeated self-harm: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1681-3

Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2021). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. Elsevier.

Westling, S., Daukantaite, D., Liljedahl, S. I., Oh, Y., Westrin, Å., Flyckt, L., & Helleman, M. (2019). Effect of brief admission to hospital by self-referral for individuals who self-harm and are at risk of suicide. JAMA Network Open, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5463

less

Dashboard Analysis and Nursing Plan

As Dr. Rempher and Ms. Manna discussed this week, data from the NDNQI is used to improve nursing practices and support the strategic outcomes of an organization. This data is also used to create the Dashboard. The Dashboard, then, is used to create an action plan. Correctly interpreting information presented on the Dashboard provides nurses with a better understanding of the goals of the action plan.

To prepare

For this Assignment, use the Dashboard located in this week’s Resources, to interpret the data and frame a nursing plan based on best practices.

  • Review the Week 5 Assignment Rubric, provided in the Course Information area.
  • Review the Week 4 Resources that pertain to the NDNQI and use of dashboards
  • Choose a Nurse-Sensitive Quality Indicator that needs improvement based on the data presented in the Dashboard. Reflect on how you would develop a nursing plan with suggestions on how to improve performance in the chosen area.
  • Develop a nursing plan that outlines suggestions on how to improve performance in the chosen area.
  • Provide at least three best practices from evidenced-based literature to support your nursing plan.

Assignment

  • Draft a 3- to 4 page paper analyzing areas where there is good performance and areas of opportunity from the sample Dashboard.
  • Analyze the data provided in the Dashboard and select an area of performance that needs improvement. Include information on why this area was chosen.
  • Develop a nursing plan that includes suggestions on how to improve performance on the selected indicator. Be sure to provide at least three best practices from the evidenced-based literature to support your suggested nursing plan.

This Assignment is due on Week 5 Day 7. It will be assessed using the Week 5 Assignment Rubric. Writing Resources and Program Success Tools

  • AWE Checklist (Level 4000)
    This checklist will help you self-assess your writing to see if it meets academic writing standards for this course.

Provided a brief paragraph that included an overview of the assignment and its purpose.

18 (7.2%) – 20 (8%)
Provided a fully developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
16 (6.4%) – 17 (6.8%)
Provided a developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
14 (5.6%) – 15 (6%)
Provided a minimally-developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
(0%) – 13 (5.2%)
Provided a under-developed overview of the assignment and its purpose with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

Presented an analysis of the data from the Sample Dashboard. Provided a thorough description of the area of performance selected that needs improvement and discussed the statistical findings and why the area was selected.

36 (14.4%) – 40 (16%)
Provided a fully developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
32 (12.8%) – 35 (14%)
Provided a developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
28 (11.2%) – 31 (12.4%)
Provided a minimally-developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
(0%) – 27 (10.8%)
Provided a under-developed analysis of the dashboard data focused on needs for improvement and statistical findings with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

Presented a nursing plan on three or more best practices that could be implemented to improve performance on the selected indicator. Included how each best practice could address the selected performance. Each best practice was supported by the professional literature.

108 (43.2%) – 120 (48%)
Provided a fully developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues
96 (38.4%) – 107 (42.8%)
Provided a developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
84 (33.6%) – 95 (38%)
Provided a minimally-developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performance with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
(0%) – 83 (33.2%)
Provided a under-developed nursing plan on three or more best practices to improve performancewith little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

Provided a summary of the main points in the paper.

18 (7.2%) – 20 (8%)
Provided a fully developed summary of the main points with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.
16 (6.4%) – 17 (6.8%)
Provided a developed summary of the main points with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.
14 (5.6%) – 15 (6%)
Provided a minimally-developed summary of the main points with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.
(0%) – 13 (5.2%)
Provided a under-developed summary of the main points with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

Academic Writing Expectations (AWE 3) 4000 Level

23 (9.2%) – 25 (10%)
Demonstrates fully developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through fully developed use of evidence from multiple sources to support content. Meets the 4000 AWE level with no writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement.
20 (8%) – 22 (8.8%)
Demonstrates developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Displays academic expression through developed use of evidence from most sources to support content. Meets the 4000 AWE level with minimal writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference requirement.
18 (7.2%) – 19 (7.6%)
Demonstrates minimally developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Beginning to display academic expression through minimally developed use of evidence from some sources to support content. Minimally meets the 4000 AWE level with several writing issues and meets the minimum reference requirement.
(0%) – 17 (6.8%)
Demonstrates limited sentence, paragraph, and essay level skills. Does not display academic expression, has limited use of evidence with few or no sources to support the content. Does not meet the 4000 AWE level of writing and does not meet the mimium reference requirement.

APA Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page, level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1″” margins, and page numbers. APA References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly. Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.
Reference list is in alphabetical order, hanging indent, double spaced in format. Each specific entry contains all information required by APA format including author, year of publication, title of publication, pages, DOI, website, as appropriate.

23 (9.2%) – 25 (10%)
Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with no formatting errors.
20 (8%) – 22 (8.8%)
Demonstrates developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with minimal formatting errors.
18 (7.2%) – 19 (7.6%)
Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting and referencing requirements with several formatting errors.
(0%) – 17 (6.8%)
Demonstrates limited APA formatting and referencing requirements with multiple formatting errors.
Total Points: 250

PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING PRACTICUM

I need the following questions answered in 200 words each. Please add references with each question and no plagiarized work  

MODULE 11

DQ1

You are a program manager at a local public health department tasked with increasing physical activity of adults in your community. How would you begin the planning process? Outline five initial steps you would take in planning a strategy to address this issue.

DQ2

What interventions are being used in your practicum setting and how do they support the organizational goals? Describe how these impact the population to improve public health. Provide three suggestions for additional long-term and short-term evidence-based practice interventions that can be used to improve public health outcomes. Support your response with one or two appropriate references.

STUDY MATERIALS

Read Standard 4. Planning and Review Standard 9. Evidence-Based Practice and Research in Public Health Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice.

Read Toolkit 7, “Developing an Intervention,” located on the Community Toolbox website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/developing-intervention

Read “Public Health Interventions Applications for Public Health Nursing Practice (Wheel Manual),” from Minnesota Department of Health. URL: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/practice/research/phncouncil/wheel.html

Explore “Chapter 23. Modifying Access, Barriers, and Opportunities” in Implementing Promising Community Interventions, located on the Community Tool Box website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/implement/access-barriers-opportunities

Explore “Chapter 24. Improving Services,” in Implementing Promising Community Interventions, located on the Community Tool Box website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/implement/improving-services

MODULE 12

DQ1

What is the purpose of evaluation in public health nursing? List two or three best practices for evaluating results of a health intervention in your practicum setting.

DQ2

Give a specific example of an evaluation framework or tools used in your practicum setting and explain the purpose of this evaluation. List and discuss three evaluation tools for public health programs, including the PDSA model.

STUDY MATERIALS

Read Standard 6. Evaluation in Public Health Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice.

Review “Using Bloom’s Taxonomy for Effective Learning,” located on the ThoughtCo website. URL: https://www.thoughtco.com/blooms-taxonomy-the-incredible-teaching-tool-2081869

Explore “Chapter 36. Introduction to Evaluation” in Evaluating Community Programs and Initiatives, located on the Community Tool Box website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluation

Explore “Chapter 37. Operations in Evaluating Community Interventions” in Evaluating Community Programs and Initiatives, located on the Community Tool Box website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluate-community-interventions

Explore “Chapter 38. Some Methods for Evaluating Comprehensive Community Initiatives” in Evaluating Community Programs and Initiatives, located on the Community Tool Box website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluate-community-initiatives

Explore “Chapter 39. Using Evaluation to Understand and Improve the Initiative” in Evaluating Community Programs and Initiatives, located on the Community Tool Box website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/evaluate/evaluation-to-understand-and-improve

Read ” PDSA: Plan-Do-Study-Act,” by the Minnesota Department of Health, located on the department’s website. URL: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/practice/resources/phqitoolbox/pdsa.html

MODULE 13

DQ1

What are windshield and walking assessments? Using the Community Tool Box reading, “Section 21. Windshield and Walking Surveys,” located in the topic materials, summarize the guidelines for windshield and walking assessments. List two unique factors that impact population health positively and negatively in the neighborhood in which you are completing your practicum.

DQ2

What resources that enable health are available in the community environment? Provide one or two specific examples of how they promote health.

STUDY MATERIALS

Read Standard 16. Environmental Health in Public Health Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice.

Read “Section 21. Windshield and Walking Surveys” of Chapter 3 in Community Assessment, located on the Community Tool Box website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/windshield-walking-surveys/main

MODULE 14

DQ1

According to the organization where you are completing your practicum, what is the role of a public health nurse in emergency preparedness and disaster planning?

DQ2

Choose a recent event (within 2 years) for which an emergency response was activated within your state. The event selected can be, man-made, mass causality, natural disaster, or infection outbreak. Considering the four phases of emergency management, what are the priorities for each phase for the event you selected?

STUDY MATERIALS

Review Standard 16. Environmental Health in Public Health Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice.

Read the American Nurses Association (ANA) 2017 Issue Brief, “Who Will Be There? Ethics, the Law, and a Nurse’s Duty to Respond in a Disaster,” located on the ANA website. URL: https://www.nursingworld.org/~4ad845/globalassets/docs/ana/who-will-be-there_disaster-preparedness_2017.pdf

Read “Steps of Emergency Management,” located on the St. Louis County Law and Public Safety website. URL: https://www.stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/public-safety/emergency-management/about/Steps-of-Emergency-Management.cfm

Read “Survey and Certification: Emergency Preparedness for Every Emergency,” from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2007). URL: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertEmergPrep/Downloads/SandC_EPChecklist_Persons_LTCFacilities_Ombudsmen.pdf

Read “Emergency Preparedness,” located on the U.S. Department of Human and Health Services website. URL: https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/special-topics/emergency-preparedness/index.html

Review “Using Bloom’s Taxonomy for Effective Learning,” located on the ThoughtCo website. URL: https://www.thoughtco.com/blooms-taxonomy-the-incredible-teaching-tool-2081869

MODULE 15

DQ1

List the health regulatory and accrediting bodies for your practicum site. How do these agencies protect the public and regulate public health?

DQ2

In what ways does the organization in your practicum setting regulate, monitor, and comply with regulatory and accrediting bodies? Describe a regulation or policy that affects your practicum work or your practicum site’s work.

STUDY MATERIALS

Read Standard 5e. Regulatory Activities in Public Health Nursing: Scope and Standards of Practice.

MODULE 16

DQ1

Summarize your practicum experience and describe the most important things you have learned. No research citations are required for this discussion question.

DQ2

What role do you envision yourself having in public health nursing? What are three steps you will take to build your public health nursing career? No research citations are required for this discussion question.

STUDY MATERIALS

Review “Using Bloom’s Taxonomy for Effective Learning,” located on the ThoughtCo website. URL: https://www.thoughtco.com/blooms-taxonomy-the-incredible-teaching-tool-2081869

Explore “Chapter 30. Principles of Advocacy” in Organizing for Effective Advocacy, located on the Community Toolbox website. URL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/advocacy/advocacy-principles

Explore “Chapter 32. Providing Encouragement and Education” in Organizing for Effective Advocacy, located on the Community Tool Box website. mURL: https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/advocacy/encouragement-education

Unit III Case study (please read carefully)

Using reliable Internet sources and/or the CSU Online Library, search for and locate a recent court case or lawsuit related to sexual harassment in the workplace. Then, conduct a case study in which you analyze the case, presenting an argument and applicable evidence about your selected court case or lawsuit. Consider the concepts learned in this course as you analyze the case and present your analysis. Include the following in your paper:

  • a brief description of the conduct that precipitated the selected court case or lawsuit and how Title VII protects against this conduct; 
  • an analysis of the use of the complaint procedure and the employer’s response to any complaints; 
  • a discussion of preventive steps that could have been used to prevent the harassment from occurring; and 
  • a summary of the costs to the employer, financial and otherwise, stemming from the lawsuit and the underlying conduct. 

Your paper should be a minimum of two pages, not including the title and reference pages. You are required to use a minimum of three sources, one of which may be your textbook as reference material for your case study. Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are used. Please note that no abstract is needed. This Case Study Example provided by the CSU Writing Center shows this type of formatting.

PSYC 301

 Instructions

The class project for this course is a written report, that addresses the biological study of a specific behavioral or mental phenomenon (normal or pathological) covered in the readings and videos. Please select a behavioral or mental phenomenon such as language or schizophrenia and then select a biological strategy for investigating it, such as hormonal or genetic mechanisms, neurotransmitters, drug treatments, or localization of brain processes by imaging. The project will be worth a maximum of 100 points.

Written paper. As an example, the theme of your report might be imaging approaches to the study of schizophrenia. Your paper should summarize fundamental issues, questions, and controversies and provide a general overview of the topic using the biological line of investigation you chose. It should also elaborate on your understanding of the brain processes that are revealed through imaging research in schizophrenia. To accomplish this, you will have to use recent research articles (published within the last five years) to illustrate relevant points. You may use any of a number of electronic databases to find research articles that deal with your topic, including the library and the Internet. The one requirement for the research articles that you select is that two of them must have appeared in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You may wish to consult with the library staff or your faculty member to confirm whether a particular journal is peer-reviewed. 

Newspaper or magazine articles should not be used as your major reference, but they are sometimes useful when they lead you to the appropriate research article. You should avoid simply repeating the articles in summary form, but rather use them within the text of your paper to illustrate important points. You are welcome to discuss your choice of topic with your faculty member to make sure you are on the right track. 

Your paper should be 1,600 words, or about 6 to 8 pages, in length (use the word count as a guide to length and stay within 200 words of the target to avoid penalties).  It must be typed, double-spaced, with one-inch margins, and fully referenced in APA format.  Please check the course schedule in this syllabus for the due date. The penalty for a late project is ten percent of the score on the project.

You may wish to submit a draft of your complete or near complete paper to the Effective Writing Center (EWC) for review and comment, prior to the due date of the paper. This should be submitted well in advance of the due date, in order for the EWC to respond and for you to make the necessary corrections. Once you receive feedback from the EWC, you can copy and paste it into a Word Document, then post it in your assignment folder with your project paper by the due date, for your instructor to view as necessary. The EWC can help address questions regarding format, structure, writing style, and appropriateness of references.

Final- Proj Risk

1. Provide an example of the upside of risk and explain the concept.

2. Explain how Enterprise Risk Management varies from traditional risk management?

3. What are fiev examples of internal and external drivers of an organization’s risk culture?

4. Provide an example company, give a description of the organization and its work area. Define what a SWOT is.  Perform a SWOT for your example company and rationalize each of the company characteristics you choose.

5. Explain what a KPI is.  How might we use KPI’s is doing a risk analysis for an organization.  Choose five KPI’s for the Amazon organization and explain why you have made your choices. 

6. Explain the Delphi Techniques.  How might it be used in comimg to consensus on risk identification related to an IT driven project?

7.  A popular hotel has continued to lose business in its room service food sales over the last five years.  Using the Six Sigma DMAIC process explain what you would do in each step of the process to improve the sales – provide relevant, practical details. What statistics would you apply and why?

8.  Explain the Plan, Do, Check, Act concept – provide a practical example.  How might it be applied in improving project quality?

9. Explain the concept of Continuous Improvement – provide an example. How might it be combined with a Lean approach

10. Explain the primary inputs and outputs in the Project Management Institute Quality Knowledge Area.

Provide a 10 page APA.