What is technology

Instructions for this discussion topic

Review each of the following resources and respond to the questions posed below.

Overview of the historical impact of technology

Some technologies that have helped to change the world

Discussion questions:

1)      Based on the resources provided above, how would you define technology? Be sure to use your own words!

2)      What are some of the key points made by Kevin Kelly regarding the role of technology in the evolution of humanity? Do you agree with his main arguments? Why or why not?

3)      According to Diamond, what is the worst mistake in the history of the human race? What does this mistake have to do with technology and society?

4)      What do you think are the top 3 most important technologies of all time? Justify your choices.

5)      What is your own favorite technology? Explain your choice.

Gender and delinquency

Discuss at least two factors that  produce resiliency in girls in order to avoid a life of crime. If you  were to develop a program for girls, what elements might you include in  you program to prevent girl delinquency? What interventions do you think  might benefit at-risk girls the most?

Post/Reply Requirements

Please  answer the question(s) above fully with no less than 300 word response  (80%). You must also reply to at least one student with a minimum of 150  word response (20%). Make sure to use proper grammer and cite any  resources utilized. You will not be able to see your classmates posts  until your post your original response.

Remember  that your post must be at least 300 words and you are required to  respond to two classmates with at least a 150 word response.

Make sure to:

  • Write a short essay or paragraph of at least 300 words.
  • Use concrete examples/details and avoid generalities.
  • Address all questions.
  • Use proper grammar and punctuation.
  • All initial discussion post must be support by academic sources even if asked your opinion.
  • Do not plagiarize.
  • You will not be able to edit your assignment once you post, so please proofread and spell check before hitting post!
  • As part of the assignment, you must also reply to TWO of your classmates with at least 150 words. You will have to POST FIRST to  see your classmates’ postings. Make sure your replies are a thoughtful  and relevant to what your classmate has posted. Try to build the  discussion and keep it going.

management 2.0

A

  1. Read the article The-Fastest-Growing-Cause-for-Shareholders-is-Sustainability (attached).
  2. In your opinion, does it pay to be socially responsible?
  3. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages for a company that pursues a sustainability strategy?
  4. How could a manager’s attitude toward social responsibility affect the company’s strategy?
  5. What is your position on social responsibility, are you for it or against it, why?

You should submit:

  • A word document with your responses
  • Make reference to material covered  (article, textbook, websites, etc., cite at least two different sources)
  • Each response should be between 1 to 2 paragraphs.
  • Format using APA style, and include any sources you cite in a reference page.
  • Must have into and conclusion

——————————————————————————————————————————————–

Instructions:

  1. Develop an existing organizational chart for Nike, Inc. located in case 20. Follow the guidelines described in the chapter when developing the organizational chart.
  2. Evaluate the existing organizational chart of Nike. What do you especially like and dislike about the company’s organizational chart?
  3. Develop a new and improved organizational chart for Nike. You may want to change up the list given, adding and deleting positions as you deem necessary as well as changing certain titles to ensure adherence to the chapter guidelines and dos and don’ts in devising organizational charts.
  • NOT A PAPER so no need for intro and conclusion just make sure to answer the questions in a couple paragraphs

——————————————————————————————————————————————–

  1. According to your textbook, the strategy-evaluation process consists of three basic activities:
  • Examine the underlying bases of a firm’s strategy.
  • Compare expected results with actual results.
  • Take corrective actions to ensure that performance conforms to the plan.
  1. Which of the three strategy-evaluation activities do you think is most critical to be performed well? Why?
  • NOT A PAPER so no need for intro and conclusion just make sure to answer the questions in a couple paragraphs

——————————————————————————————————————————————–

benchmark- conflict

Conflict is multifaceted problem that takes understanding its parts and how each individual approaches it such that you can make a constructive solution. This assignment requires you to assess a destructive conflict, your own conflict style, and how to appropriately resolve it.

Write a paper (1,000-1,500 words) doing the following:

  1. Summarize a conflict you recently experienced for the factors that made it destructive in nature. Your discussion should utilize material from Chapters 1 & 2.
  2. Utilizing the conflict styles assessment on page 147, informally interview two persons close to you about their perceptions of your personal conflict style. Discuss the differences between your own and others’ perception of your style. Include both positives and negatives of your style.
  3. Reflecting on your destructive conflict, what other conflict style could you adopt to constructively resolve that conflict? This should include prescriptive behaviors that overcome the weaknesses or use the strengths to constructively resolve the situation.

This paper should include four additional academic sources that support your position. These are outside the textbook.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. 

All B.A. in Communication majors should save the final version of this assignment with edits that incorporate faculty feedback after grading. Students should also save the assignment directions. COM-490: Communication Capstone will require students to prepare a portfolio that showcases their work in the program. Please save this assignment in multiple locations. See the “Communication Professional Portfolio Guide” under course materials for further instructions.

PSY5101-Week3 Discussion: Discuss Ethics

In this assignment, you will develop a discussion post that addresses the following questions, and then post this in The Commons area. Then, you will read at least two other posts and you are encouraged to comment on them.

  1. How might you build a library of ethical resources for yourself? What resources might you include and why?
  2. Who would you go to for challenging ethical concerns (you do not need to provide actual names, just the role or where you might look (i.e., a member of your network, a mentor where you work, etc.). If you have not yet identified people who might be valuable as a resource for ethical issues, explain how you might build such a network of connections.
  3. In this week’s materials, you read about a number of historical studies that served as the impetus for developing and refining the ethical standards. How might knowing the past help you in your ethical efforts? Is your work done or can you strengthen your ethical guidelines (offer your thoughts on why or how) as we move forward?

Submit a copy of the post you made to The Commons and a brief explanation of your experience in reading other’s posts. Identify one new idea you gleaned from the experience.

Length: 650-750 words

Assign 2 ct

Due 12/12/202 9am 

To prepare for this assignment:

  • Review the article, “Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison.” Pay particular attention to the ethical standards followed in the Stanford Prison Experiment.
  • Review the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Think about which APA ethical standards might apply to the Stanford Prison Experiment and about what problems or conflicts might arise if these standards were applied.
  • Consider whether this study could be conducted today under current ethical standards and why or why not.
  • Keeping in mind the APA ethical standards you reviewed, notice if there are any ethical issues, problems, or flaws in the research study. If so, think about why they are issues, problems, or flaws.

The assignment (2–3 pages):

  • Briefly describe each ethical issue, problem, or flaw you found in the Stanford Prison Experiment.
  • Explain why you consider each to be an ethical issue, problem, or flaw.
  • Explain whether the same research, if conducted today, would be considered ethical or unethical and why or why not.
  • Justify your position citing specific APA ethical codes that apply.

Stangor, C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. Chapter 3, “Ethics in Research”

http://pdf.prisonexp.org/ijcp1973.pdf

https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index

https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/forensic-psychology

5.4 Reflection

 Submit a 500-750 word referenced reflection on what you feel were the key items covered during the week and how they might apply to your present or future education, life, or ministry. This is a very important part of the learning experience each week and should contain significant reflection on what you have learned.
Specifically, you should report on:

  1. What significant insights did I gain this week?
  2. How did what I learned affect my thinking about this week’s topic?
  3. What previous experiences relate to what I read and learned?
  4. How will I use (or have I used) this knowledge in my work, ministry, or life?
  5. What could I additionally learn or explore about this week’s topic?

The above five (5) weekly reflection questions are independent of each other, meaning that your response to each question may or may not be a continued discussion of the previous question. It is possible to have five (5) entirely different responses to five (5) different aspects of what you learned this week.To score well, the reflection must make reference to the assigned reading (including parenthetical references), will include suggested real-world manifestations of the course material, and will include a plan for implementing the material in a personal and/or professional setting. Adhere to the following for this assignment: 

Discussion board 4

For this week’s discussion, the focus will be on examining Porter’s Five Forces as a tool for looking at the pressure on profits. Specifically, how does Porter’s analysis examine the stress on profits from all directions and all dimensions of a firm’s environment?  You will be applying this tool by specifically looking at the market structure in which a firm completes.  You will need to be able to distinguish an oligopoly from a monopolistic competitive market structure.

Instructions:

There are two groups of firms below.  

  • Group 1: firms in the retail sector (e.g. Amazon;  Wal-Mart; Target; Kohl’s; Sears; Macy’s) 
  • Group 2: firms in the wireless services industry (e.g. Verizon; AT & T; Sprint/T-Mobile) (this about telecommunication services, not about the sale of phones) 

For each group determine and explain if the group is monopolistic competitive or an oligopoly. You need to specific for both in which market structure the firms operate.

Then choose one of the firms from one group.  Using a Porter’s analysis what are the threat to profitability?  This would be a great time to expand your research skills by checking out the firm’s investor relations page.  Use the Research Hub. Go to the ECO550 Library landing page and if you need help, Ask the Librarian to help you find the investor relations page.

socw 6301

 This week’s video introduces you to the Hernandez family. Juan and Elena Hernandez are mandated to attend parenting classes. As part of the parenting classes, they are required to participate in both a pretest (taken before classes begin) and a posttest (taken after classes end). Pretests and posttests can yield very useful information. They can measure the learning that has or has not taken place as a result of the education being provided. For this Discussion, imagine what kinds of questions would be on a pretest and posttest for this particular study sample (the parents who are taking parenting classes).

By Day 5

Post your explanation of what you think the social workers wanted to know when they designed the pre/posttest for evaluating the parenting classes. Be sure to address the concept of attrition and whether or not you believe they took that into account. Be sure to explain why. Then, analyze potential lessons learned from attrition. Finally, explain how you might design a study to gather data about the effectiveness of these parenting classes. Use the following questions to focus your thinking:

  • Would you recommend a pre-experimental, experimental, or quasi-experimental design?
  • Would the study involve measurement over time?
  • Would there be a control group?
  • In this group research design you imagine, what or who will be compared?
  • What limitations in terms of generalizability and internal validity can you anticipate based on the research plan you envision?
  • What can you tell the social worker about the issue of client drop out (also called attrition or experimental mortality)?
  • If there is no control group, what type of research design could answer the question: Is this parent training class effective in reducing abusive parenting practices?

project week 3 health policy and promotion

Instructions

This written assignment requires the student to investigate his/her local, state and federal legislators and explore their assigned committees and legislative commitments. The student is expected to investigate current and actual legislative initiatives that have either passed or pending approval by the house, senate or Governor’s office. The student will draft a letter to a specific legislator and offer support or constructive argument against pending policy or legislation.  The letter must be supported with a minimum of 3 evidence based primary citations. (See Rubric)

  1. The letter must include a discussion regarding your local, state and federal legislator and his/her assigned committees and legislative commitments.  
  2. The letter must discuss the specific policy or legislation (Bill or Act)
  3. The letter must offer support or constructive argument against pending policy or legislation. 
  4. The letter must be supported with a minimum of 3 evidence based primary citations.
  5. Follow the Grading Rubric Closely

Rubric

Legislation Type State or federal, scope of practice, reimbursement, loan repayment etc. Review of the Literature Use a min of 3-4 primary sources of evidence. Not older than 5 years

Current Policy What is the current policy or health policy issue and how might it impact nursing or healthcare? Proposed Policy or Pending Changes to Policy What are they? Be specific. You may have multiple changes in one piece of legislation

Stakeholders Who benefits from the changes? Who supports the changes/legislation? Outcomes How will this impact nursing practice and the healthcare system?

Uses correct spelling, grammar, and professional vocabulary. Provides credible resources using correct APA format.

The state I want the project focused on is Florida.

example of letter

Date

The Honorable________________

The State Senate (or House of Representatives)

State Capitol

Santa Fe, NM  87503

Dear Senator (or Representative)____________:

Letter Content

Cite appropriate References in the content of the Letter

Sincerely,

Your Name

References Page Must be included after the Letter

List References in APA format