Discussion Thread: Information Systems Development Topic Selection

  

The student will post thread of at least 500 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least two scholarly citations in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include peer reviewed journal articles, content from relevant professional associations/platforms, course materials, the textbook, the Bible, etc.

Note: Diagrams do not count towards word counts.

Discussion Thread: Information Systems Development Topic Selection

For your thread, answer 2 of the following questions:

1. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the waterfall approach to system development.

2. What are the pros and cons in reference to an organization’s buy versus build decision? Explain why you would choose one method over the other.

3. In chapter 8, the authors state that security and controls are often an afterthought. Provide an empirical example of how poor security controls impact an organization or Information System.

4. Identify 2 systems development processes, and compare and contrast the differences. In your evaluation, identify which process you would choose to development a new software application for the marketing department that must be available within a 6-month time frame.

5. What are the 4 different kinds of feasibility that must be assessed? Why is the feasibility of a system reviewed during the investigation, analysis, and design phases?

6. You are responsible for developing a User Interface for a group of users within your organization. Describe the User Interface; choose and explain your preferred design method.

7. Identify and briefly describe 4 types of testing that are conducted during the integration and testing phase.

8. Provide an example of how a disaster recovery plan is implemented within the software development process life cycle.

Week 1-Discussion 1: Social Construction of Identities

Social Construction of Identities

Social identities are the categories we use to specify who we are, both to ourselves and to the world around us (Newman 2016). These identities include race, class, gender, sexual orientation, etc. For this discussion, you will explore how these identities are formed and maintained over time.

To help you complete this discussion, review the following resources:

There are also additional resources listed under Recommended Resources that you can review if you would like additional information.

Using the resources above as evidence to support your ideas, address the following:

  • Explain what sociologists mean when they say that identities are socially constructed. Select a particular racial or gender identity, and give an example of a characteristic of that identity that is socially constructed (rather than based on any biological truth).
  • Stratification refers to the hierarchical ranking of individuals within a given group (Newman 2016). Describe the stratification system of either race or gender (use the identity you selected above) and explain how this hierarchical ranking is a social construction rather than based on biology.
  • Chapter 1 in your text argues that what is at stake with these social identities is power and privilege. Using either race or gender, describe how one of the theories of inequality discussed in Chapter 1 (structural-functionalism or conflict theory) would explain why some groups within the identity experience inequalities.

Reference:
Newman, D.M. (2016). Identities and inequalities: Exploring the intersections of race, class, gender, & sexuality (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.vitalsource.com/

 Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7.

NU560-WEEK5-DISCUSSION1-REPLY1

 

In research from Chiwaula et al. (2021), researchers observed that most nursing care decisions and actions are not evidence-based but derived from work experiences, direction from experts, education, and clinical practices rather than scientific origins. This lack of evidence-based practices (EBP) compromises nurses’ ability to improve care to be effective, safe, and efficient. There is a lack of strategies to translate EBP into nursing practice, which inhibits nursing care quality from improving from ineffective or risky practices. In this particular study, the Iowa model was used because it is a problem-solving approach that focuses on organizing the processes that support the implementation of EBP. The five steps of the model include: identifying the problem(s), selecting, critiquing, and combining relevant research, designing, planning, and piloting change into practice, and integrating and sustaining change. 

In my opinion, a change agent is a person that takes on the responsibility of transforming the status quo to improve their practice regardless of others’ views. Throughout my nursing career, I’ve witnessed policies and procedures still used that were outdated and irrelevant in today’s modern medicine. As things in the medical field are ever-evolving, so should our practice as nurses. The best way to integrate evidence-based change is through models such as the Iowa Model, as described above. Models such as this ensure a smooth transition into new practices and a lasting effect on policies. For example, nurses in my PCICU unit changed PICC line dressings on an as-needed basis because that is how it had always been done. The process of changing the dressing was not focused on the outcome desired, which was decreasing central line-associated bloodstream infections. The change agent involved with altering this policy to reflect current EBP discovered that changing the dressings weekly lowered the patient’s infection risk. When nurses begin focusing on outcomes rather than just processes, we put the patient’s best interest in priority over customs. 

Drama Discussion

 

Drama Discussion

By the due date assigned, post your response of at least 150-200 words to the Discussion Area. By the end of the week, comment on at least two of your classmates’ submissions.

Before beginning this assignment, read Tennessee Williams’ The Glass Menagerie.

Prompt: You may choose to discuss a character or the setting of the play. Choose ONE of the following:

Option 1: In one or two well-developed paragraphs, analyze a character, explaining the person’s actions, conflicts, and motivations. Include examples and at least one quotation from the play as supporting evidence.

Option 2: In one or two well-developed paragraphs, discuss some aspect of the setting (space, place, and time) and how it forms the backdrop and defines the atmosphere for the play. Setting can include props, as well. If you would like to focus on the symbolism of some of these stage elements, you may do so. In your response, include examples and at least one quotation from the play as supporting evidence.

Resource: Refresher on Character
A reader or viewer of a play can learn about a character in a number of ways. Here are some questions to think about before drafting your response:

  • Dialogue/monologue – How do the words the character says reveal information about who he/she is? Does the character have a noticeable speech pattern? Does the character’s use of language reveal his/her emotional state? What is revealed through what others say about the character?
  • Action – What is shown through the character’s actions or lack of action?
  • Stage directions/movement/props – What is revealed through the character’s placement on the stage, movements, and use of props?
  • Relationships/interactions – What is understood about the character through relationships and interactions with other characters?
  • Development – Does the character grow and change during the play, or is the character static and unchanged? How developed or round is the character?
  • Role – Is this character the narrator? If so, is he/she reliable or unreliable?

Resource: Refresher on Setting

  • Settings can symbolically present character issues. For example, a locked door could represent an obstacle within a character’s life. At other times, the setting can limit or allow the characters’ actions.
  • Setting can be the physical space in which the story is placed (confined or open, small or large, limited to one place or not).
  • Setting can be the cultural and social landscape in which the story is situated, including the time in which the action takes place (time of day, year, era, or century).
  • Setting can include the stage directions, including lighting, music, and placement of props.

MKT680 Responses

K Rucker

Reviewing the course objectives, all course objectives are required to become successful in management. Being able to handle situations that can cause a potential legal and/or ethical problem is a huge deal. Not being able to have the skill set to handle this situation can blow up larger than what occurred. Being able to handle all situations in a professional and ethical manner is an important aspect and is not always easy. Being able to understand that objective and learn to apply the knowledge can help with that. Another really important objective is creating plans to improve business operations. With being a manager, you should always be thinking of ways that you can improve your day-to-day functions. Every area has room for improvement and the world is continuously improving. Being able to know that and know how to look for improvements can help with that objective. There are a lot of risks associated with not mastering these objectives, but the main issue for me would be a manager not trying to learn or improve their skills. Not every manager can master everything, but a manager that doesn’t try is not fit to be a manager. Not knowing how to handle ethical or legal situations can set the company back in many ways such as sales or even with employees. Employees are an important part of a business and not being able to have correct ethical standards with your employees can cause issues and that can always set the company back.

It is very important to have current data in a SWOT analysis. SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. If data is not current and the company is using data from 6 months ago, they can miss what new strengths the business has gained and they can focus on weaknesses that are no longer a problem. The company can seek out opportunities for growth that are no longer available. Using old data can cause any company to miss out on the new threats that they may have. Using old data and cause the company to lose a lot of time and money.

L Spight

            Accomplishing the course objectives listed for this course will support my success in management by exposing me to and preparing me for the varying levels of complexity, change, and oversight associated with being an effective leader in any organization and industry.  Mastering these objectives will aid in my ability to critically evaluate team and company preparedness, make sound and logical business decisions, and create effective change management plans.  These skills will ensure minimal, negative business impacts that can impact the company, my team, and the internal and external customers served.  The risks and challenges encountered by failure to master the course objectives are very similar to risks and challenges I have notated from other courses and course objectives if failed.  Those risks and challenges are company revenue and profit losses, potentially new and existing customer losses, industry and customer distrust, and legal issues (Spight, 2020).  For any business, large or small, these are things that could be the difference between success or failure and even remaining open or having to close (Spight, 2020).  

A SWOT analysis is a strategic management tool that allows a company to analyze internal and external environmental factors to assess where the company stands in the industry and market and develop strategic business plans based on these factors to guarantee growth and remove failures.  This type of analysis “provides the basis for companies’ strategic decision-making processes” (Büyüközkan & Ilıcak, 2019).  When making any decision, it is critical to have the most current and up-to-date information.  Otherwise, the decisions made will be false-positive or false-negative as the data and real-world circumstances are counterfeit.  “Knowing the current environment is necessary to understanding the future environment” (American InterContinental University, 2021).  As a result, current data “can help firms to put their aptitudes, their experiences and their available data in a correlative order, to synthesize methodically, cohesively and effectively their answers against the pressing challenges they are facing” (Büyüközkan & Ilıcak, 2019).  This ensures that the various organizational areas can utilize the internal capabilities to meet the company’s vision, mission, and objectives and thwart off threats and improve weaknesses. 

 

V Jaramillo

Coca-Cola is an American company with operations all over the world. Its products include non-alcoholic beverages and syrups. It is one of the companies that have unique products that are tailor-made to the market and the offerings are dependent on the target market. Certain products in the United States include Minute Maid, Schweppes, Fresca, Dasani Water, Coca-Cola, Sprite and Fanta. However, when looking closely at other markets, the products offered by these companies are different from the original American products. In Japan, most of the products are iced tea such as green tea, iced coffee, Coca-Cola, Fanta, and Sprite. In India, the products include spiced buttermilk, Coca-Cola, Minute Maid, and Dasani (Coca-Cola India. n.d.).

One of the main factors pointed out on the websites of these three countries is that most of the original products are available in these three countries. However, there are additional products that are country-specific based on the culture of the country and the drink preferences. Most of these products are not shared by other products, and in most cases, they bring the company the most sales. The websites of the company in these countries are similar in the aspects of color as they use the official Coca-Cola color red. However, the content of the three websites is different, America’s website has the company’s milestones on the home page, The Indian website has the people and management while the Japanese have the product offerings and current campaigns (Products / Campaigns. (n.d.).

Companies with global markets have unique offerings in different markets. The brand names of the products are different, and even the ingredients are different. This event is due to the differences in the culture, and the availability of the ingredients. It is also important to note that there may also be differences in terms of marketing and management strategies.

C Gwaltney

     Halliburton is a global leader in energy services in the United States and India. It began it’s venture into the energy sector around the world back in the 1910’s when it was known as HOWCO. It was a company that could separate water from oil back in the 1920’s in rural Oklahoma.  It became internationally known as Haliburton in the early 1960’s, and it began to expand in oil production and revenue, before going international.  Dick Chaney was the CEO of Haliburton before becoming Vice President under President George W. Bush.  During the time being a CEO, there were scandals that popped out to mind, like the Deep Water horizon, allegations of wrong doing in Nigeria, and environmental mistakes along the way.  Looking at the different websites in Houston,  Dubai and the Middle East, there are subtle differences in the way how the website is laid out, there is more information on jobs in India and the Middle East, as opposed to having the same products that is being produced in the U.S. It is second in the energy business, only behind Schlumberger.  It continues being very profitable, and it continues it’s hauling of sand in Texas and Louisiana.  Halliburton is known around the world, and it’s reputation follows the name. 

1300 word min 3 scholarly sources due 2/26

Essay 1 

This week, we learned about the origins of the Juvenile Court system, philosophies for the intervention of juvenile delinquency and wayward youth, and law enforcement’s response to juvenile offenders. For your Unit 3 Complete assignment, write a narrative essay (minimum 1300 words) in which you address and discuss the questions and statements listed below. Use at least three scholarly sources and remember to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the READ and ATTEND sections in your essay. Cite your sources in APA format.

• Explain how Juvenile Courts came to be, and how juvenile offenders are handled differently from adult offenders when prosecuted for a criminal act.

• Use your text and the internet to research the case of Fare v. Michael C., 444 U.S. 887 (1979). Provide an overview of the case, discussing the facts, issue, and ultimate court holding.

• Are police investigators held to a different standard when questioning juveniles in police custody? What are the standards for adults and what are the standards for juveniles? Would there be any changes for a juvenile who was 8 years of age as opposed to a 16 year old?

• Applying what you have researched for the above three essay prompts, explain what you believe should be in a standard police department policy on interviewing juvenile suspects.

Wk3 DQ – Advanced Statistical Concepts and Business Analytics

Question:

Please answer each of the following questions in detail and provide examples for better clarity wherever applicable. Provide in-text citations.

1. What makes a function of a discrete variable a candidate for a discrete random variable distribution? What about the counterpart of this candidacy in the case of a continuous variable?

2. Provide a detailed discussion on the distribution of:

     a. A discrete random variable, in general terms, and then provide a numerical example of this distribution. 

     b. What are the mean and the standard deviation in your example? 

     c. How does this differ in the case where the random variable is continuous? 

3. Explain the significance of the mean, variance, and standard deviation for a random variable.

4. How does the probability of a union of disjoint events exhibit itself when dealing with a (discrete or continuous) random variable? Provide an example

5. What is the expectation operation and what are its properties? How does the expectation operation yields relate between the mean, the standard deviation, and the second moment?

Note:

1. Need to have at least 1 peer-reviewed article as the reference and textbook as the reference

2. Need in-text citation

3. Please find the attachments as the power points of the course for reference.

4. Textbook Information:

Bowerman, B., Drougas, A. M., Duckworth, A. G., Hummel, R. M. Moniger, K. B., & Schur, P. J.  (2019). Business statistics and analytics in practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill

ISBN 9781260187496

5. Please find the Course Learning Outcome list of this course in the attachment

human behavior

  

illustrate how human behavior, the many areas of diversity, our legal system, marketing, and HR concepts are relevant to understanding and managing diversity in the workplace

Assignment Details: 

Write a 1,000-word paper. Consider all your readings this week, and throughout this entire course. Then answer the following questions:

1. Apple has a unique corporate culture and has enjoyed a lot of success. Apple obviously leverages diversity in many ways! Provide 3 benefits that Apple gains through their diversity practices. Explain. Or….

1(a) Google has taken a unique approach to the question of diversity by mandating a change in their employment statistics. Google is mandating diversity in its hiring practices, in its management ranks and in its technical ranks. Provide the reasons behind Google’s move in this direction and the consequences it has had for the organization. 

2. Should diversity be a top priority for business success? Why or Why not? Ensure you cite research to validate your answer.

3. Name two ways in which diversity strengthens a team or company. Also, name two ways in which a lack of diversity could weaken a company. Explain each.

Submission Requirements: 

· APA format is required, which includes:

o Title page

o 12pt. font in Times New Roman and double-spaced 

o Reference page, with in-text citations 

· Entire paper length should be 1,000 words or more; the answer to each question should be over 300 words each. 

· Include an introduction and conclusion (included in word count!)

bharg research paper

 

The final portfolio project is a three- part activity. You will respond to three separate prompts but prepare your paper as one research paper. Be sure to include at least one UC library source per prompt, in addition to your textbook (which means you’ll have at least 4 sources cited). 

Start your paper with an introductory paragraph.

Prompt 1 “Blockchain” (2-3 pages): Explain the major components of blockchain. Be sure to include how blockchain is affecting a global economy and how you see it growing in the future. 

Prompt 2 “Big Data” (1-2 pages): Describe your understanding of big data and give an example of how you’ve seen big data used either personally or professionally. In your view, what demands is big data placing on organizations and data management technology?  How does big data affect a global economy.

Prompt 3 “Government and Policies” (1-2 pages):  Discuss the role government plays in a global economy.  Also, look at what policies are currently in place and then discussion what policies should be put in place..

Conclude your paper with a detailed conclusion section. 

The paper needs to be approximately six to eight pages long, including both a title page and a references page (for a total of eight to ten pages). Be sure to use proper APA formatting and citations to avoid plagiarism.

Your paper should meet these requirements: 

  • Be approximately six to eight pages in length, not including the required cover page and reference page.
  • Follow APA 7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
  • Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The UC Library is a great place to find resources.
  • Be clearly and well-written, concise, and logical, using excellent grammar and style techniques. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.

The Servant Leader II

 

Refer to “Love Your People: The New Respect Revolution,” located in the study materials. Of the nine tips of truly human leadership, which do you think you would struggle with the most as a conscious servant leader? Why? Add supporting citations to strengthen your claims.

 

Love Your People: The New Respect Revolution

Barry-Wehmiller CEO Bob Chapman learned that the way to ensure a happy, productive workplace is to treat every employee like family. Now he’s challenging all CEOs to do likewise.

By Dale Buss -January 29, 2020

Bob Chapman is glad to see the folks at the Business Roundtable are woke. The group’s recent redefinition of the purpose of corporations—to include the needs of stakeholders such as employees as well as shareholders—got the work-culture guru opining that it’s about time America’s most august collection of CEOs caught up to him.

“Bravo!” Chapman wrote on a public post on LinkedIn, a few days after the Business Roundtable proclamation. “Now the real work must begin. Moving from intention to action to indoctrination will require significant resources and a great deal of courageous patience.”

Who is this guy inviting the captains of capitalism to follow a path he first trod? The 74-year-old Chapman is a mild-mannered former accountant, not a new-age digital-tech entrepreneur. His manufacturing company fabricates old-school metal things like pressure-sensitive labeling machines in Minneapolis and facial tissue-making equipment in Germany. Chapman wears a Western-style string tie and talks about employees being “someone’s precious child.”

His company, Barry-Wehmiller, is headquartered in St. Louis—geographically near the center of America but considered the boondocks by coastal cognoscenti when it comes to sophisticated, global-level thinking about leadership and management. Yet, Chapman attracts disciples from every corner of business and around the world. He built a privately held, $3 billion diversified manufacturing empire by acquiring low-hanging fruit in 110 separate transactions over 45 years. He’s also spearheaded the transformation of the culture of Barry-Wehmiller and its 12,000 employees, as well as that of each new company he brings into the fold.

His basic notion is that business leaders must recognize that work life is the single biggest determinant of how a person performs not just vocationally but also personally, and that the way to ensure a happy, productive workplace is to treat every employee like family. Not only does this approach transform what happens on the job, but it can have profound effects outside work and on an employee’s overall satisfaction with life.

Chapman distilled his approach into a broad formula he calls Truly Human Leadership and in that he encourages business leaders to enact in their own ways (see below). How to do so begins, in his view, with creating a robust enterprise. “You need to have a resilient business model, because if you don’t, you’ll hurt the very people you want to help,” Chapman says. “You can also have a profitable business model but really hurt people getting there.”

With that base, practitioners of Truly Human Leadership conduct what Chapman calls “business visioning,” which encourages stretch goals, and “cultural visioning,” in which leaders get hopeful about transform- ing the workplace with values and behaviors. He recommends creating a “leadership checklist” of the actions managers and executives should take every day.

Lean thinking and continuous improvement play roles, too—although aimed not at replacing jobs but at enhancing outcomes. Leaders should encourage their charges to exercise “responsible freedom” to make choices without fear of second-guessing. They must also continually look for opportunities to recognize and celebrate achievements, awarding “firefighting” and “firelighting.”

SPREADING THE WORD

Chapman began sharing his employee-centric management philosophy in a popular TED talk in 2012, codified it in a book in 2015 and now spreads the gospel in about a dozen speeches and appearances around the world each year.

Meanwhile, consulting wings of Barry-Wehmiller help enact culture-change at eager clients that range from American Airlines to Meijer to the San Francisco 49ers.

Chapman’s results “prove that it’s not the work that matters—it’s where and with whom and who our leaders are,” says Simon Sinek, the Start With Why organizational consultant and Columbia University professor who was an early booster of Chapman’s philosophy. “It’s a better way of doing business than the current bastardized system of capitalism, with short-term thinking that is good for Wall Street but bad for companies and the workers themselves.”

“Bob has found ways to get enormous things out of average people, and most of us are average,” adds John Stroup, CEO of Belden, a St. Louis-based, $2.6 billion manufacturer, and a member of Barry-Wehmiller’s board since 2008.

Putting people first, as in Chapman’s book, Everybody Matters: The Extraordinary Power of Caring for Your People Like Family, is hardly a new idea. But the fact that it’s gone largely underutilized is borne out by damning statistics on American employee disengagement even amid a strong U.S. economy and nearly full employment.

“I experienced three revelations that my ideas are built on,” says Chapman. “First, why can’t business be fun? Second, business is the most powerful force for good in the world. And, third, everyone who works for you is someone’s precious child.” This kind of philosophizing was far from Chapman’s mind in 1975 when, at the age of 30, he took over as CEO of Barry-Wehmiller after his father, the previous chief, died of a heart attack. The company had diversified from supplying bottle-washing equipment to breweries to making other packaging systems. But it was flirting with bankruptcy.

Chapman launched a company turnaround and began getting good ROI—but with a poor culture. “At one point he told me he thought our executive team got along pretty well,” remembers Rhonda Spencer, Barry-Wehmiller’s chief people officer. “I asked him, ‘Where are you working? We’re killing each other out here.’ It was like most other companies. It was never a bad place to work; it just wasn’t special. It was exciting because of all the growth, but there was nothing purposeful about the culture.”

Chapman continued on the first of what he calls his two journeys: value creation. Following the philosophy of the late Charles Knight, the iconic leader who was still CEO of Emerson Electric at the time, Chapman diversified his company away from its historic business, concentrating growth in no single market or technology. He focused on hard- luck potential acquisition targets, forswore banks for financing the deals and hoarded cash to get them done.

The result: year after year of double-digit growth in revenues and profits. “If he weren’t so good at what he did, there would be no way for him to create the environment he’s created,” Stroup says. “He has great business insight.” For example, “I can’t remember a time where he’s overpaid for a company. If he can’t buy a company on terms that he thinks are good for shareholders or employees, he just walks away.”

PARENT LEADERSHIP LESSONS

Chapman’s “human journey” is his other trek. As he built Barry-Wehmilller, he found himself relying on insights from raising six children with his wife, Cynthia Chapman, more than anything else. “Bob’s thinking grew as his family and the complexity of dealing with them grew,” says Raj Sisodia, Chapman’s co-author. “I was trying to fix this 100-year-old business with what I learned in business school and graduate school,” Chapman recalls, “but I came to define the word ‘management’ as ‘the manipulation of others for your success.’ What I learned about being a good parent was about leadership. And everything I learned in business school was wrong.”

Still, it wasn’t until 1997 that holding a March Madness bracket competition in the headquarters office opened his eyes to the transformative power of fun in the workplace. “We saw a significant improvement in performance and a dramatic change in joy from that one exercise,” he says.

From there, he and Spencer began collecting maxims that already littered Chapman’s office walls, and a 2002 summit of the company’s 20 top leaders produced a seminal manifesto. “We came up with a foundational document that guided us, and then we said we have to go out and preach this in the company,” Chapman says. “Where we were not living these values, employees would point it out.” A copy of Barry-Wehmiller’s Guiding Principles of Leadership still hangs in the headquarters’ lobby.

The journeys began converging in places such as at Paper Converting Machine Co. in Green Bay, Wisconsin. In the early 2000s, the family-owned, $200 million maker of giant machines for tissue-manufacturing companies was a dysfunctional mess with wild swings in business, market-share losses to foreign competition, counterproductive micromanagement on the factory floor, unpredictable layoffs, a top executive layer that was financially insulated from its own poor leadership and, not surprisingly, a toxic culture.

Barry-Wehmiller acquired the company in 2005, and Chapman went to Green Bay to promise a revival to the 1,000 employees. “I said, ‘We believe in you. We can turn this business around, and we can do it with the people who are here today.’” Barry-Wehmiller extended the operation’s customer base, embarked on a continuous-improvement process, boosted quality and applied Chapman’s people philosophy. Turnaround ensued within two years, and a few years later, Paper Converting Machinery Co. stood as a model of a transformational culture.

CARE IN MOTION

For Barry-Wehmiller as a whole, the rubber met the road during the Great Recession, when its business suddenly plunged by nearly 40 percent for a time. “Before we’d published our guiding principles, I would have done exactly what everyone else did: dehumanize, downsize, make layoffs, rightsize,” Chapman says. “So we said, ‘What would a caring family do?’ We’d all pitch in and take a little pain.”

The company furloughed everyone for a month and suspended 401(k) matching to spread the sacrifice. “People were more than willing to do it so their friends at work didn’t get hurt,” he says. “Senior leadership members volunteered to take weeks off for someone else. Caring for each other was amplified dramatically. Morale went up.

Another benefit of handling the pain with- out layoffs was that Barry-Wehmiller was fully coiled when the economy recovered, and the company enjoyed its fastest growth from 2011 through 2013. It has continued to report double-digit performance gains year after year.

Eight years ago, Chapman reached out to Sinek to see if he would be impressed. “I went to visit four factories and was blown away,” recalls Sinek. “But I told [Chapman] until they shared the means for providing this culture where people love coming to work, it’s pointless. That really shook Bob, and he committed shortly thereafter to being much more public and open and willing to share what they’d learned.”

The proactive thrust included spreading the Truly Human Leadership philosophy through its internal “university;” through business units such as BW Design Group, a technology-consulting arm that alone has 1,500 professionals serving clients worldwide; and by creating, in 2016, the BW Leadership Institute, recently renamed the Chapman & Co. Leadership Institute.

A committed Episcopalian, Chapman resists making his philosophy an instrument of proselytization, even though he says he’s “blessed by a higher calling to spread this message. I don’t want to exclude anyone from the tent. I use the word ‘care’. It’s universal.”

DEVELOPING DISCIPLES

One of the Leadership Institute’s first clients, Webasto Roof Systems, an auto-sunroof supplier in Rochester Hills, Michigan, began its Truly Human Leadership journey with a company-wide, weekend-long “summit” at a casino in Detroit, where employees spent hours in exercises such as openly celebrating small achievements by their fellow workers, face-to-face around banquet tables.

Other leaders took a DIY approach to embracing the philosophy. After looking up Chapman’s TED talk, Lippert Components CEO Jason Lippert decided to apply Chapman’s ideas to the 800 leaders in his RV component manufacturing company of 9,000 employees. He hired 10 leadership coaches and six “personal development” coaches for those leaders to help them live out a corporate philosophy Lippert called “Everyone Matters” and to drive it down through the ranks.

“We created five clear leadership values, and if [leaders] don’t live by those values, they can leave,” Lippert says. Among results: Attrition shrank to about 28 percent from 115 percent in five years, even amid fierce labor demand in the RV business.

Marc Braun, president of St. Louis-based Cambridge Engineering, flew with Chapman to a Barry-Wehmiller operation in Wisconsin, where he interviewed a handful of employees. “Real people shared real stuff,” says Braun, whose HVAC-equipment manufacturing company has succeeded in its own cultural transformation. “It’s what allowed me to know that the heart behind it is real.”

Not every company scores immediate or broad success after unwrapping Chapman’s precepts. American Airlines, for example, struggled with union-contract disputes last year, three years after welcoming in Leadership Institute consultants to reprogram top management, under CEO Doug Parker. The airline is “improving systems and operations as the culture moves along, but it’s a challenge when you’re trying to work with 130,000 people,” says Matthew Whiat, an Institute partner.

With the next economic slowdown, whenever it comes, companies that have em- braced Chapman’s approach—including his own—may face a huge test of their commitment to Truly Human Leadership.

Meanwhile, Chapman continues to expand his personal efforts to spread a philosophy he believes can improve both businesses and the work lives of their employees—one that originated with a relatively obscure manufacturer in St. Louis.

“We’re actually known more already now for our culture than our products,” Chapman says. “I’m incredibly proud.”

THE HOW OF HUMAN LEADERSHIP

Few CEOs argue with Bob Chapman about treating employees better, and many marvel at his recounting of the results of his philosophy at companies across America. But they wonder: How do I do it? We asked Chapman and CEOs who’ve tried Truly Human Leadership for tips:

Start simply: Chapman writes in Everybody Matters, “People often ask, ‘Bob, how can we do this? Where do we start?’ It starts with caring about the people you lead, which means listening deeply to them and inspiring them to share their gifts fully. We then celebrate their journey toward our shared goals, in ways that are thoughtful, timely, and proportional.”

Succeed in business: “It’s not as simple as just caring,” Belden’s John Stroup says. “That’s incredibly important, but without a successful business you can’t create what they’ve created at Barry-Wehmiller. What [Chapman] demands is a commitment to culture, then makes big investments in training to help people learn to be more effective.”

Joe Wilhelm, president of BW Design Group, says that adherents should “never compromise the fundamental sustainability of the business as you try to implement your vision. People are counting on you to have a safe place to work.”

Get serious: Sinek complains, “Every CEO says people are important; they just don’t make decisions that prioritize their people or make their culture stronger. You need to be a true student of leadership, actually out there talking and learning and asking for advice.”

Also, advises Chapman, apply discipline during good times. “If you never gain weight,” he says, “you never have to lose weight. The best time to transform a culture is when the business is healthy.”

Assume difficulty: Chapman gets many requests for what amounts to a detailed handbook for Truly Human Leadership. “It’s like, ‘What do you want from me?’” Sinek says. “Bob’s frustration is that there are no ‘five steps to achieving great culture.’ It’s practice; it’s lifestyle. It’s not a two-day off-site. So Bob isn’t going to give you a checklist, because it wouldn’t work.”

And there are no shortcuts. “It’s the layer of leaders at lower levels who need to be about discipline and process and market leadership and all the things that bring people along and engage them in the vision,” Spencer says. “You have to engage people in creating their own future but through continuous improvement, making things better and changing things that are frustrating to them.”

Use common sense: “How do you treat a loved one? With respect,” says Matthew Whiat, a Leadership Institute partner. “It doesn’t mean you don’t let people go, but if you do, you do it in a respectful manner.”

Adds Lippert Components CEO Jason Lippert: “Everyone who has common sense knows what empathy is. And we also hold people accountable.”

Apply first aid: To revive a struggling organization, Chapman advises communicating a strong message of hope, taking immediate and tangible actions to “get the patient healthy,” such as fixing the most compelling problems and removing obvious bottlenecks, starting to build teamwork and a sense of oneness, and catching people “doing things right” instead of wrong.

Vow to share sacrifice: Don’t over- promise. “You can’t say that you’ll never lay anyone off—that would be a bit of a fallacy,” Wilhelm says. “But the key is to do everything possible to protect [employees], because we’re in this for the long term.”

Tap into “visioning”: Chapman calls visioning “the most powerful tool in leadership, forcing an organization to articulate its assumptions and aspirations and helping paint a vivid picture” of what they want the company to become. “We constantly ask business leaders, ‘Where is the unit going? Why? When you get there, how will this have taken people to a better place?’” says Chapman.

Check your motives: Truly Human Leadership isn’t meant as a cudgel for achieving specific results. “If you start with the wrong reason, you end up with the wrong result,” Chapman says. “You don’t do this to make more money or improve retention. It’s—if you look at the people you have the privilege of leading, how can you not do this?”

Dale Buss